Federer highlights from his five-year dominance at the US Open

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Not sure if this has already been posted before but about a month ago the US Open posted this neat little video with nice points from pretty much every match Fed played during his five-year reign over the US Open. Clocks in at a whopping 35 minutes and there are plenty of fun points to watch, so check it out if you want while GPPD burns in flames.


A few observations about this video:

- The Agassi QF in 2004 seems to be highlighted the most out of any of the matches in this compilation, and rightly so. It's a great match, marred a bit by the terrible wind for parts of it. Probably about 3 minutes in total for the match starting from 3:38.

- Missing the Fed-Lopez 2007 match??? A shame because there are some pretty nice points from there. There are a few other matches missing as well, but they're all early rounds thankfully.

- Sadly, a few matches with great Fed points are glossed over, but that's the price you pay for trying to condense something like this into 35 minutes.

- Pretty backhand fans, click on 17:40

- As for Fed's level of play, his forehand is just godly here. It was best in the 2004-2005 editions (as you can probably tell in the video) but 2006-2008 was phenomenal as well. The backhand, on the other hand, looked better in the 2006-2008 points (2006 looks like the best of the lot in this video which reflects how good it was in that tournament as a whole). Here, I step into controversy for a bit, but the 2004 USO forehand is probably the best forehand of all time imo.

Observations about Fed at the US Open irrespective of what the video shows:

- I think his best USO was 2004 and the worst of these five would be 2007, but only the good points are shown here so you wouldn't be able to tell. In order, I have them 2004 > 2006 > 2005 > 2008 > 2007. Not to say that 2007 Fed wasn't still incredible, but just not as good as the other four.

- I'd forgotten about the Andreev match in 2008 going five. Can anyone explain what exactly happened there? I'm not sure if I remember what it was that made Fed struggle so much here (and they also had a somewhat close match in AO 2010 IIRC).

- The matches I'd probably recommend to you all for the quality of play would be the 2004 QF, the 2005 SF-F, the 2006 QF and F, the 2007 QF, and the 2008 SF.

That was pretty long, but peak Fed at the US Open is my favorite player to watch honestly. It's why you've seen a little bit of fanboying here and also why I decided to make the thread in the first place. I know this thread will be susceptible to trolling, but if you can, keep it low for this one. 'ts all.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Your thread is not new, but hey, no thread is new at this point on TTW (y)

The youtube comments, of course, are salty AF.

And yeah, Fed at the USO was a joy to watch. Sometimes I wish he wins one more USO more than 1 more Wimb.

And the surface used to be so fast in 2004-2008, compared to what we've had in the last 10 years. Nowadays, people marvel at the AO being fast when back in the 2000's the USO courts were fast all the time.
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Dammit, I should have known somebody had already posted the video here. It was over my two-month break. Can I get a link to the original thread?

Anyway, there goes all that time and energy on a repost.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
For all it's worth, these could be records of Fed's that might stand the test of time:

- 40 consecutive match wins at the USO
- 5 consecutive USO titles
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
more likely overachieved since he never played a true force where (i.e. nadal and djoko):-D

LMAO. Fed beat djoko 3 times at the USO losing 1 set including prime level performance in USO 08.
7th best fed at the USO 11 had 2 MPs vs the peakest of peak Djoko at USO 11. LULZ.

The lesser said about Nadal's joke draws at the USO, the better.
LMAO. 4 cakewalk draws to the final. spraying for 2 sets djokovic in USo 13, coming off a fairly below par year in USO 10 djoko, LMAOnderson in USO 17 and med playing good, but not great tennis in USO 19 (whom Nadal could've beaten in straight sets)
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
more likely overachieved since he never played a true driving force there (i.e. nadal and djoko):-D
LMAO. He beat djoko 3 times at the USO losing 1 set including prime level performance in USO 08.
7th best fed at the USO 11 had 2 MPs vs the peakest of peak Djoko at USO 11. LULZ.
Now, now, gentlemen. This is a space of love and appreciation. Don't start with this weak era discussion pls
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
yea i know all you wanna do is to defend your idol here, nothing new, thanks for response:-D

So no response to the actual argument. Typical of fed-disliker/hater/propagandist.
I could tell more about non-Fed matches when half-asleep than you could fully awake. Have watched many full matches from 1970s onwards (only a few before). So :-D
 

alexio

G.O.A.T.
So no response to the actual argument. Typical of fed-disliker/hater/propagandist.
I could tell more about non-Fed matches when half-asleep than you could fully awake. Have watched many full matches from 1970s onwards (only a few before). So :-D
of course you can dear, i have no doubts about that, but would be better to save the fuse for another battle;):D
 
D

Deleted member 779124

Guest
Not sure if this has already been posted before but about a month ago the US Open posted this neat little video with nice points from pretty much every match Fed played during his five-year reign over the US Open. Clocks in at a whopping 35 minutes and there are plenty of fun points to watch, so check it out if you want while GPPD burns in flames.


A few observations about this video:

- The Agassi QF in 2004 seems to be highlighted the most out of any of the matches in this compilation, and rightly so. It's a great match, marred a bit by the terrible wind for parts of it. Probably about 3 minutes in total for the match starting from 3:38.

- Missing the Fed-Lopez 2007 match??? A shame because there are some pretty nice points from there. There are a few other matches missing as well, but they're all early rounds thankfully.

- Sadly, a few matches with great Fed points are glossed over, but that's the price you pay for trying to condense something like this into 35 minutes.

- Pretty backhand fans, click on 17:40

- As for Fed's level of play, his forehand is just godly here. It was best in the 2004-2005 editions (as you can probably tell in the video) but 2006-2008 was phenomenal as well. The backhand, on the other hand, looked better in the 2006-2008 points (2006 looks like the best of the lot in this video which reflects how good it was in that tournament as a whole). Here, I step into controversy for a bit, but the 2004 USO forehand is probably the best forehand of all time imo.

Observations about Fed at the US Open irrespective of what the video shows:

- I think his best USO was 2004 and the worst of these five would be 2007, but only the good points are shown here so you wouldn't be able to tell. In order, I have them 2004 > 2006 > 2005 > 2008 > 2007. Not to say that 2007 Fed wasn't still incredible, but just not as good as the other four.

- I'd forgotten about the Andreev match in 2008 going five. Can anyone explain what exactly happened there? I'm not sure if I remember what it was that made Fed struggle so much here (and they also had a somewhat close match in AO 2010 IIRC).

- The matches I'd probably recommend to you all for the quality of play would be the 2004 QF, the 2005 SF-F, the 2006 QF and F, the 2007 QF, and the 2008 SF.

That was pretty long, but peak Fed at the US Open is my favorite player to watch honestly. It's why you've seen a little bit of fanboying here and also why I decided to make the thread in the first place. I know this thread will be susceptible to trolling, but if you can, keep it low for this one. 'ts all.
I would want to do one of these threads on 2003-2009 Federer at Wimbledon but judging how this thread has gone better not lol.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Not sure if this has already been posted before but about a month ago the US Open posted this neat little video with nice points from pretty much every match Fed played during his five-year reign over the US Open. Clocks in at a whopping 35 minutes and there are plenty of fun points to watch, so check it out if you want while GPPD burns in flames.


A few observations about this video:

- The Agassi QF in 2004 seems to be highlighted the most out of any of the matches in this compilation, and rightly so. It's a great match, marred a bit by the terrible wind for parts of it. Probably about 3 minutes in total for the match starting from 3:38.

- Missing the Fed-Lopez 2007 match??? A shame because there are some pretty nice points from there. There are a few other matches missing as well, but they're all early rounds thankfully.

- Sadly, a few matches with great Fed points are glossed over, but that's the price you pay for trying to condense something like this into 35 minutes.

- Pretty backhand fans, click on 17:40

- As for Fed's level of play, his forehand is just godly here. It was best in the 2004-2005 editions (as you can probably tell in the video) but 2006-2008 was phenomenal as well. The backhand, on the other hand, looked better in the 2006-2008 points (2006 looks like the best of the lot in this video which reflects how good it was in that tournament as a whole). Here, I step into controversy for a bit, but the 2004 USO forehand is probably the best forehand of all time imo.

Observations about Fed at the US Open irrespective of what the video shows:

- I think his best USO was 2004 and the worst of these five would be 2007, but only the good points are shown here so you wouldn't be able to tell. In order, I have them 2004 > 2006 > 2005 > 2008 > 2007. Not to say that 2007 Fed wasn't still incredible, but just not as good as the other four.

- I'd forgotten about the Andreev match in 2008 going five. Can anyone explain what exactly happened there? I'm not sure if I remember what it was that made Fed struggle so much here (and they also had a somewhat close match in AO 2010 IIRC).

- The matches I'd probably recommend to you all for the quality of play would be the 2004 QF, the 2005 SF-F, the 2006 QF and F, the 2007 QF, and the 2008 SF.

That was pretty long, but peak Fed at the US Open is my favorite player to watch honestly. It's why you've seen a little bit of fanboying here and also why I decided to make the thread in the first place. I know this thread will be susceptible to trolling, but if you can, keep it low for this one. 'ts all.

1. I'd go 2006 > 2004 > 2005 > 2007 > 2008 though USO 04 final was fed's best match at the USO.
2007 > 2008 because of the Andreev match.

2. Fed struggled with Andreev's heavy FH in that match. earlier round match, wasn't fully tuned in. Andreev outplayed him baseline to baseline. fed's serve and net play were instrumental in him winning the match.

3. top 5 fed performances at the USO would be: 2004 USO SF/F, 2005 USO QF and 2006 USO SF/F IMO.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Federer played great tennis in 3 other USOs post 2008. Not fair to just take peak when Federer stopped winning.
 

ForehandRF

Legend
Federer played great tennis in 3 other USOs post 2008. Not fair to just take peak when Federer stopped winning.
Not that much in the 2010 SF.If not for Djokovic's nerves after losing 3 times to Fed at the USO, that match would have ended in 4 I think.
 

AnOctorokForDinner

Talk Tennis Guru
Federer played great tennis in 3 other USOs post 2008. Not fair to just take peak when Federer stopped winning.

way more erratic, cmon. 2011 closest to prime but getting obliterated for two sets still drags it lower. Yeah Djo was good but no way prime Fedr could actually be so helpless for that long, he'd whip a couple winners at will to break the mold as he always did.
 

alexio

G.O.A.T.
Spoken by someone not even alive when Fed was winning 5 straight at the USO. :-D
actually i'm younger than you by around ten years (plus minus).. so wrong:-D and a little hint: that post was created under influence of that criminal thread, i.e. not so serious, in other words, for obvious reasons (and also, don't say again please that joseph koba killed 40-50, that's not necessary here for sure, on a tennis board
 

RS

Bionic Poster
way more erratic, cmon. 2011 closest to prime but getting obliterated for two sets still drags it lower. Yeah Djo was good but no way prime Fedr could actually be so helpless for that long, he'd whip a couple winners at will to break the mold as he always did.
In a very broad sense, you could say that Fed’s general USO prime was 2004-2011 with 2010 being an outlier. But these five USO runs are definitely his best of the lot.
Speaking from a Djokovic fan POV not my own.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Can Nadal of 2010 enter a 5th set or win vs any 2004-08 Fed in the finals Federer fans?
 

NoleIsBoat

Hall of Fame
LMAO. Fed beat djoko 3 times at the USO losing 1 set including prime level performance in USO 08.
7th best fed at the USO 11 had 2 MPs vs the peakest of peak Djoko at USO 11. LULZ.

The lesser said about Nadal's joke draws at the USO, the better.
LMAO. 4 cakewalk draws to the final. spraying for 2 sets djokovic in USo 13, coming off a fairly below par year in USO 10 djoko, LMAOnderson in USO 17 and med playing good, but not great tennis in USO 19 (whom Nadal could've beaten in straight sets)
Agree with much of this. Nadal had the worst competition at the USO out of the three, it’s a scandal he has more titles than Djokovic.

Djokovic competition was unbelievable. Peak/prime Fed x6. Peak Nadal x3. Peak Murray x1. Peak Wawrinka x2.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Agree with much of this. Nadal had the worst competition at the USO out of the three, it’s a scandal he has more titles than Djokovic.

Djokovic competition was unbelievable. Peak/prime Fed x6. Peak Nadal x3. Peak Murray x1. Peak Wawrinka x2.
Credit to Djokovic for beating USO 11 Federer. Probably the best player any of the big 3 beat at the USO.
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Can Nadal of 2010 enter a 5th set or win vs any 2004-08 Fed in the finals Federer fans?
Look man, I know you’re in a baiting mood today, but I kinda don’t want this thread to turn into a s**t-flinging contest. Already had a few close calls.

That being said, my serious answer is that Nadal has a great shot against 2007 and 2008 Fed, a decent shot against 2005 Fed, and would be the underdog against 2004 or 2006 Fed imo.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Look man, I know you’re in a baiting mood today, but I kinda don’t want this thread to turn into a s**t-flinging contest. Already had a few close calls.

That being said, my serious answer is that Nadal has a great shot against 2007 and 2008 Fed, a decent shot against 2005 Fed, and would be the underdog against 2004 or 2006 Fed imo.
Was actually asking but thanks.

Think he loses in 4/5 to 04/06 - 50/50 with 2005 and favourite over 07/08 Fed.
This seems fine. IMO they might all go 5.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
2004 Agassi > peak Nadal?

2006 Roddick ~ peak Nadal

Nadal is such a vulture ROFLMAO

talking about SF/F fed in USO 04 obviously - clearly better than in the USO 04 QF. nadal wasn't flash in the 2010 USO QF anyways. He just happened to face Verdasco who faded after a good start in 1st set.
2010 USO nadal was clearly better than 2006 USO Roddick. Obviously nadal wouldn't lose 2 sets 2 and 1 like Roddick did. Doesn't mean fed of USO 06 final would lose 2 sets vs him.
 

AnOctorokForDinner

Talk Tennis Guru
talking about SF/F fed in USO 04 obviously - clearly better than in the USO 04 QF. nadal wasn't flash in the 2010 USO QF anyways. He just happened to face Verdasco who faded after a good start in 1st set.
2010 USO nadal was clearly better than 2006 USO Roddick. Obviously nadal wouldn't lose 2 sets 2 and 1 like Roddick did. Doesn't mean fed of USO 06 final would lose 2 sets vs him.

If Federer plays like in the first of 06 Dubai final, how can Nadal stop him?

btw, always convenient when a player does *not* play his best against the strongest opponent he ends up facing in the particular tournament and still wins. whatever the player and the tournament. A nice platform to claim said player would have won so much easier if only he were at his bestest.
 
Top