Federer, Nadal or Djokovic will win the 2019 US Open

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Im afraid I am schooling you and you are getting upset. I am sorry this is hurting but I am posting facts. 2008 Nadal was shattered after winning the OG, which was the priority at the time.

Last year injury struck, and 2005 Nadal was 18.

So if you are relying on Nadal being injured, then that proves me right. Yes injury might strike, as ive always said GOATDAL biggest opponent is himself...and you have just accepted it.
Can you refute my facts just once? I mean a real refutation, not this silly nonsense you always give us.

Is that so hard to do?

Oh right... it is next to impossible.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Ive just told you..Tennis World. I haven't saved the link as I tend not to be a library, but you so obsessed by this then you can scroll through their posts, I believe it was 2018 sometime after Roland Garros it was posted if memory serves me right.

Sorry but I cannot find it. I am not obsessed by it, I am curious to know about this statement that Nadal was injured at USO 2015, which before you, no one else ever mentioned here. I mean if it was injury that prevented him from the beatdown that was coming his way in that quarter final, then it does change the narrative. Now, since you asked me for Federer's medical reports in the other thread, and then said you will go with facts which is what he said, I will do the same, if you cannot show me his medical reports, I will go with what Nadal himself said about 2015, that he was low on confidence not that he was injured.

Happy to end this discussion here.
 

Pantera

Banned
Sorry but I cannot find it. I am not obsessed by it, I am curious to know about this statement that Nadal was injured at USO 2015, which before you, no one else ever mentioned here. I mean if it was injury that prevented him from the beatdown that was coming his way in that quarter final, then it does change the narrative. Now, since you asked me for Federer's medical reports in the other thread, and then said you will go with facts which is what he said, I will do the same, if you cannot show me his medical reports, I will go with what Nadal himself said about 2015, that he was low on confidence not that he was injured.

Happy to end this discussion here.
I wasn't referring to Nadal's quote..i said Uncle Toni
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
I wasn't referring to Nadal's quote..i said Uncle Toni

Uncle Toni isn't Rafa. Rafa himself said he wasn't injured at any time in 2015, he was low on confidence. Sorry, but I will take the word of the man himself, unless you are calling Rafa a liar here.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Queens was a 250 event back then....whats the relevance of a 250 event? Do you actually follow tennis? I mean that in all seriousness as it seems you cannot differentiate between a 250 event and 1000 event?
.Queens used to be the ONLY real test before Wimby. Still is a major test.

Even after Halle appeared Queens remained a pivotal event that drew in a field as strong as some weakly fielded M1000s.

Check the draws at Queens. Check out the Queens draw in 1994 for example.

It's because Queens is taken very seriously because aside from Halle there is no better test.

Capiche?

I repeat: players take whatever is the best test available for an upcoming slam, and since Queens isn't a Masters, they are happy to play it as a 500. It makes no difference. It's a tune-up.

Next you'll be telling me Queens/Wimbledon don't count because they aren't in Canada...
 

Pantera

Banned
Uncle Toni isn't Rafa. Rafa himself said he wasn't injured at any time in 2015, he was low on confidence. Sorry, but I will take the word of the man himself, unless you are calling Rafa a liar here.
I am only posting what Uncle Toni said and he often is correct. You can believe what you want. Fact is Nadal is Canadian Open champion which guarantees him a good USO run, always does. And I only see Djokovic as even remotely capable of beating him and even that seems unlikely on the current form I am seeing.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Uncle Toni isn't Rafa. Rafa himself said he wasn't injured at any time in 2015, he was low on confidence. Sorry, but I will take the word of the man himself, unless you are calling Rafa a liar here.
There is only one liar on this thread... He uses LOLs and makes up non-facts. He is a comedian.
 

Pantera

Banned
.Queens used to be the ONLY real test before Wimby. Still is a major test.

Even after Halle appeared Queens remained a pivotal event that drew in a field as strong as some weakly fielded M1000s.

Check the draws at Queens.

It's because Queens is taken very seriously because aside from Halle there is no better test.

Capiche?

I repeat: players take whatever is the best test available for an upcoming slam, and since Queens isn't a Masters, they are happy to play it as a 500. It makes no difference. It's a tune-up.

Next you'll be telling me Queens/Wimbledon don't count because they aren't in Canada...
stopped reading after you said Queens was the real test...a 250 event. cannot stop laughing sorry.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
I am only posting what Uncle Toni said and he often is correct. You can believe what you want. Fact is Nadal is Canadian Open champion which guarantees him a good USO run, always does. And I only see Djokovic as even remotely capable of beating him and even that seems unlikely on the current form I am seeing.

So you are basically calling Rafa a liar here. And of course I will believe what I want, I will believe what has come out Nadal's mouth himself, that 2015 his confidence was down, not that he was injured. Sorry if that goes against the narrative of Nadal is better than Djokovic at USO if he is not injured. Not buying it if Rafa himself is not selling it.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
stopped reading after you said Queens was the real test...a 250 event. cannot stop laughing sorry.
I am glad you finally realized that laughing at yourself is a much better way out than trying to play with irrelevant non-facts.

The men in white are coming though...
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Here we go..lose the argument then resort to personal insults. If a nadal fan did that they would be banned. Oh the irony.
Who insulted you?

If you feel insulted then how come you can laugh at the same time? Makes no sense. Insulted people generally aren't in the mood to laugh.

But yeah, love the fact you boycotted my last post about Queens, that you stopped reading it. Facts scare many people...
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
If you did, you wouldn't always tell other people to google when they are asking you to back up what YOU said.
Is that what he does?

Now that is so bizarre. And weak.

I don't have any helpers, don't need them. I assumed other posters were self-reliant too. Seems not...
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
So you are basically calling Rafa a liar here. And of course I will believe what I want, I will believe what has come out Nadal's mouth himself, that 2015 his confidence was down, not that he was injured. Sorry if that goes against the narrative of Nadal is better than Djokovic at USO if he is not injured. Not buying it if Rafa himself is not selling it.
Rafa's 2015 being a result of a confidence slump and not injuries is pretty much common knowledge. I can't believe we are even discussing it.
 

Pheasant

Legend
Here are the odds against winning the USO in Vegas.

Djokovic 5/4
Nadal 4/1
Federer 5/1
Zverev 20/1
Delpo 20/1
MuryGOAT 25/1
Cilic 25/1
Thiem 25/1
Tsitsipas 25/1
Nishikori 28/1
Kyrgios 28/1
Medvedev 33/1

Note: I never bet on low pay outs and never have. That's why I've never bet on Rafa to win the FO, or won't bet on Djokovic to win here. The pay out is not exciting in the least to me.

I bet on long shots, like 8/1 or better. Note: I don't even know if I'd bet on Federer at 8/1. I think 5/1 is terrible odds for him. He's more of a 15/1 to me.

I don't like any of the above. But if I had to choose, I'd go Thiem at 25/1.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Rafa's 2015 being a result of a confidence slump and not injuries is pretty much common knowledge. I can't believe we are even discussing it.

Yeah, me neither. Which is why I was interested in him giving us some facts which show that we have been mislead all this time, and mislead by Nadal himself of all people, who played a full season in 2015.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
First Nadal being 18 when winning Canada in 05 is not a fact, it is a mistake. Then to think that Roger doesn't stand a chance is bullsheet. He just beat Nadal a month ago.......
Djoko not favorite against Rafa because of 1-2 h2h? Funny. First fact : Rafa is much slower and mentally weaker than he was back then. Djokovic is mentally stronger than he was. Fact 2 : djoko humiliated Rafa in AO and never lost against him on hard court since USO13
Everything you said is 100% true.

I am waiting in rapt anticipation how your post will be "refuted"...

Will anyone dare try to refute it?

This should be interesting.
 

Enceladus

Legend
I only post facts.
OldfashionedUnequaledDogfish-size_restricted.gif

:laughing:(n)
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Here are the odds against winning the USO in Vegas.

Djokovic 5/4
Nadal 4/1
Federer 5/1
Zverev 20/1
Delpo 20/1
MuryGOAT 25/1
Cilic 25/1
Thiem 25/1
Tsitsipas 25/1
Nishikori 28/1
Kyrgios 28/1
Medvedev 33/1

I don't like any of the above. But if I had to choose, I'd go Thiem at 25/1.
So Las Vegas odds-makers are completely incompetent nitwits? I don't get it.

Giving an awful Murray the same odds as Thiem and others is literally like me betting on cycling or Martian NBA.

The fact they rate Rafa higher than Roger is also pretty troubling. Maybe it's that desert air, it's full of dust particles that invade the brain through the ears...
 

Dilexson

Hall of Fame
These guys are making a joke of the tour at their age, lol.
Can Mury-Goat turn the clock back and end another 11 in a row Big3 slam streak?:unsure:
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
I am only posting what Uncle Toni said and he often is correct. You can believe what you want. Fact is Nadal is Canadian Open champion which guarantees him a good USO run, always does. And I only see Djokovic as even remotely capable of beating him and even that seems unlikely on the current form I am seeing.
Winning Canada doesn't guarantee anything lol. He struggled to win almost every match last year at UO before retiring in the SF.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
So Las Vegas odds-makers are completely incompetent nitwits? I don't get it.

Giving an awful Murray the same odds as Thiem and others is literally like me betting on cycling or Martian NBA.

The fact they rate Rafa higher than Roger is also pretty troubling. Maybe it's that desert air, it's full of dust particles that invade the brain through the ears...
Murray is the guy you decide to point out when Zverev is 4th? That's the biggest joke on the list. Also, how is Delpo going to win if he has already withdrawn?
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Murray is the guy you decide to point out when Zverev is 4th? That's the biggest joke on the list. Also, how is Delpo going to win if he has already withdrawn?
I figured I'd leave the absurdly high Zverev odds for someone else to comment. He has so many haters, I don't need to add myself to that lynch mob.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
I don't actually hate the guy, but very disappointed with him. I once disliked him a long time ago.
I don't mean you, and I don't mean literal hate.

Literal hate on TTW exists only amongst Big3 fans toward the rival players. That's real hate, in some cases.

But yeah, Zverev is disappointing now, but many early upstarts have a bad year after the early successes. He will be back, be sure of it.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Good luck finding any betting company that puts Federer before Rafa to win.
I don't understand that. Do these knuckleheads just go by rankings? Are they that thick?

Don't they realize RF won two HC slams recently, and Rafa won just one since 2014? Don't they know Rafa beat no Big4 players to win his USO17? Don't they know Rafa can't beat either Novak or RF on non-clay events since 2014?

As if a no3 player is totally inferior to a no2. Laughable.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
I don't mean you, and I don't mean literal hate.

Literal hate on TTW exists only amongst Big3 fans toward the rival players. That's real hate, in some cases.

But yeah, Zverev is disappointing now, but many early upstarts have a bad year after the early successes. He will be back, be sure of it.
I don't hate any of them. I have a strong dislike for Djokovic. Nadal is an OK guy in my book, but I disagree with a lot of things he does on court and some of the injury stuff. Hopefully, you're right about Zverev. Tennis needs someone to step up.
 

TheGhostOfAgassi

Talk Tennis Guru
Understandable since Fed hasn't won it in over a decade. I'd still favor Fed in a h2h clash though.
I don't understand that. Do these knuckleheads just go by rankings? Are they that thick?

Don't they realize RF won two HC slams recently, and Rafa won just one since 2014? Don't they know Rafa beat no Big4 players to win his USO17? Don't they know Rafa can't beat either Novak or RF on non-clay events since 2014?

As if a no3 player is totally inferior to a no2. Laughable.
Maybe you guys should place a huge bet then if Fed gets in Rafas half and they play the semis :)
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Nadal is an OK guy in my book, but I disagree with a lot of things he does on court.
I find him absolutely hilarious. His quirks and OCD, he is just like me, except even more insane. To me, his weirdness and peculiar "warrior gestures" are what help make him unique in tennis. I much more prefer the weird than the mundane, like all those pros who seem like robots, they bore me.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Maybe you guys should place a huge bet then if Fed gets in Rafas half and they play the semis :)
It wouldn't even be a contest. RF in three sets. Because:

1. Rafa fears RF.
2. Rafa is usually plagued with injury by the time he gets to USO QF/SF.
3. Hasn't beaten RF on non-clay since half a decade.
4. RF will be in top form.
5. RF figured out how to beat Rafa hence no longer fears him.

And they should play in the same half. 2 seed should always get 3 seed in semis. I hate that random crap, 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 4. That's rubbish.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
I find him absolutely hilarious. His quirks and OCD, he is just like me, except even more insane. To me, his weirdness and peculiar "warrior gestures" are what help make him unique in tennis. I much more prefer the weird than the mundane, like all those pros who seem like robots, they bore me.
Rafa has given me and many others laughs over the years. He is a walking meme for sure.
 

TheGhostOfAgassi

Talk Tennis Guru
It wouldn't even be a contest. RF in three sets. Because:

1. Rafa fears RF.
2. Rafa is usually plagued with injury by the time he gets to USO QF/SF.
3. Hasn't beaten RF on non-clay since half a decade.
4. RF will be in top form.
5. RF figured out how to beat Rafa hence no longer fears him.
I’m willing to do a bet with you. Are you in?
If I win you have to join the prediction league for 6 months and prove yourself and your skills.
If you win, what do you want me to do?

I also think it’s a 50% chance Federer will not even reach the semis. When I see the draw I might do a double bet on that too.
 
Top