Roger will win Wimbledon, and will lose no more then 2 sets total, and 1 set most in any match in doing so.
Gasquet could not beat Roger in Halle when Roger was dead tired from the French. Gasquet stupidly has overplayed by entering a second straight event. Roger will go through him in straights, Halle is not Wimbledon.
Henman doesnt have a prayer in hell of even taking a set off Roger. He is far from beating a top player right now in his current form. He took a set off Hewitt in Queens, big deal so did 3 others. Hewitt wasnt playing at all at Queens until the final.
Berdych is an easy matchup for Fed. Their match at the French was a joke, and Roger himself said he should have won their final in Halle 6-0, 6-3 or something. Despite Berdych sneaking out a lucky set he was Fed`s easiest match in his weary Halle performance.
Ancic I doubt will even make the quarters, if he does he will be lucky to get a set. Ancic has not beaten a single top player in any grand slam except Henman at 04 Wimbledon.
Nalbandian wont make the semis. He is not good enough to be in the semis of 3 straight slams, so is due for a loss. Even if he makes it Roger has won 6 of their last 7, Nalbandian`s best chance to beat Roger is a fast hard court, it wont happen here.
Any of Hewitt, Roddick, or Ljubicic in the final will be a huge underdog vs Roger.