Federer vs. Nalbandian

Federer -750 vs. Nalbandian +680

  • Fed 2-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fed 2-1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nalby 2-1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nalby 2-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

Tchocky

Hall of Fame
Roger has a chance to go up 7-6 in head to head matches against his old rival. Federer is a heavy favorite but I think Nalbandian can win a set. I still like Roger to win this match and win his 1st title in Madrid.
 

Watcher

Semi-Pro
We'll see. I think Nalbandian knows that he could have (and probably would have) beaten Fed at Roland Garros this year if he hadn't had to retire. He's going to be thinking about that moment between now and when he steps on to the court.
 

Breaker

Legend
I'm pulling for the upset VAMOS NALBY!!

Hopefully Nalbandian can come out in good form and make some more magic to get the win, though the odds are clearly in Federer's favor.
 

edberg505

Legend
This is a really tough call. It could go either way. I'm not totally convinced that Nalbandian is back to his old self just yet. With all the early losses ever since his semi showing at the French, I just don't want to pencil him in to the finals yet. But in that semi-final against Fed, he was blasting Fed off the court. I'm going with Fed in straights. We'll see.
 

Raistlin

Rookie
Watcher said:
We'll see. I think Nalbandian knows that he could have (and probably would have) beaten Fed at Roland Garros this year if he hadn't had to retire. He's going to be thinking about that moment between now and when he steps on to the court.

And that would be his downfall.
 

grimpi

Rookie
I want to nalby wins, but it´s very very dificult. He beat Safin, but he isn´t play his best tennis this days, and to beat Federer, you must play excelent.
 

Andres

G.O.A.T.
I want Nalbandian to win, but I don't see it happening.
Federer in 3, probably 6-2 the 3rd set...
 

gts072

Semi-Pro
Andres Guazzelli said:
I want Nalbandian to win, but I don't see it happening.
Federer in 3, probably 6-2 the 3rd set...

Wow. For once you're not totally behind your countryman? I admire your objectivity...;)
 

Shabazza

Legend
close call - but I'm hoping for Fed to win in straights against Nalby 2.0 - I don't like this "new" version!
 

Fedexeon

Hall of Fame
Depends. If Federer finds back his return game, he may win easily. If he still struggles with it, a tough game will be ahead of him. =D
I hope for a great match between them.
 

pound cat

G.O.A.T.
This is going to be a joke unless Nalbandian ups his level 200% over the way he played yesterday..which was pretty lame, against a tired and line-call abused opponent. .
 

Rob_C

Hall of Fame
I think the results here, and the rest of the year prove Fed is the man, and that Nadal is one-dimensional, and that the players will continue to figure him out, sorta like they figured out the Williams sisters. Wouldnt be surprised to see Nadal start to get beaten on clay next year. It's happened to all of the previous dominant clay courters, Courier, Bruguera, Moya, Ferrero, Coria.

I'm predicting Fed wins the French next year. You heard it here first.
 

Shabazza

Legend
6:4 6:0 Nalby was out of fuel and will in the 2nd and I'm very glad Federer put a beating on him, this time!
 

pham4313

Professional
oh great...hang on folks...Berdych and Nadal second set is on...let's see the poor rude monkey gets pound on
 

Docalex007

Hall of Fame
Ouch. Federer eats Nalby alive!

....



....Ouch. 6-4 6-0

Somebody please go ahead and give the Fed the Madrid trophy....please. :)
 

Grimjack

Banned
Rob_C said:
I think the results here, and the rest of the year prove Fed is the man, and that Nadal is one-dimensional, and that the players will continue to figure him out, sorta like they figured out the Williams sisters. Wouldnt be surprised to see Nadal start to get beaten on clay next year. It's happened to all of the previous dominant clay courters, Courier, Bruguera, Moya, Ferrero, Coria.

I'm predicting Fed wins the French next year. You heard it here first.

Not only didn't I hear it here first, this isn't even the first YEAR I heard it.

Why do we go through this same crap every year? Are most of you just too simple to remember results more than a month at a time?

This is the fast court season. Nadal is a non-factor here. Even though, around the beginning of June, when the slow court season has just ended and we have to hear how Nadal has "really changed and elevated his game, and is now a threat everywhere, and will soon challenge for GOAT!!!!!," we nonetheless don't have to pay heed to such idiocy.

Likewise, when Federer has just dominated the next three-quarters of the tennis calendar, that doesn't mean Nadal will have suddenly forgotten how to win on his only really great surface.

Every year -- same crap.

Nadal won't be "for real -- an all-surface threat!!!" four months from now when he's winning clay tournaments and looking good on the snail-slow hardcourts at places like Miami and Dubai.

And he's not "disappointing" now. He's just the same player he's always been. One-dimensional and deadly at any venue that rewards a willingness to park five feet behind the baseline and run balls down all day.

"Figured him out?" Players don't HAVE to figure him out. He's obvious. FANS have to figure him out. He's nigh-unstoppable on slow, and highly vulnerable everywhere else. Why must we make this into rocket science?
 

War Safin!

Professional
oscar_2424 said:
Wow Federer totally destroy Nalbandian
And you're surprised???? LOL. :mrgreen:
I told you, it should've been Safin in this match - it'd been a close-3-setter without question....
 

Fedexeon

Hall of Fame
Grimjack said:
Not only didn't I hear it here first, this isn't even the first YEAR I heard it.

Why do we go through this same crap every year? Are most of you just too simple to remember results more than a month at a time?

This is the fast court season. Nadal is a non-factor here. Even though, around the beginning of June, when the slow court season has just ended and we have to hear how Nadal has "really changed and elevated his game, and is now a threat everywhere, and will soon challenge for GOAT!!!!!," we nonetheless don't have to pay heed to such idiocy.

Likewise, when Federer has just dominated the next three-quarters of the tennis calendar, that doesn't mean Nadal will have suddenly forgotten how to win on his only really great surface.

Every year -- same crap.

Nadal won't be "for real -- an all-surface threat!!!" four months from now when he's winning clay tournaments and looking good on the snail-slow hardcourts at places like Miami and Dubai.

And he's not "disappointing" now. He's just the same player he's always been. One-dimensional and deadly at any venue that rewards a willingness to park five feet behind the baseline and run balls down all day.

"Figured him out?" Players don't HAVE to figure him out. He's obvious. FANS have to figure him out. He's nigh-unstoppable on slow, and highly vulnerable everywhere else. Why must we make this into rocket science?

But remember that last year he was the defending champion in Madrid. So people would expect more from him. I would call it a disappointment for his results after Wimbledon.
 

Swissv2

Hall of Fame
Time for a yummy bagel
150px-Bagel.png
 

The tennis guy

Hall of Fame
Grimjack said:
And he's not "disappointing" now. He's just the same player he's always been. One-dimensional and deadly at any venue that rewards a willingness to park five feet behind the baseline and run balls down all day.

"Figured him out?" Players don't HAVE to figure him out. He's obvious. FANS have to figure him out. He's nigh-unstoppable on slow, and highly vulnerable everywhere else. Why must we make this into rocket science?

Exactly. People who are REALLY surprised of Nadal's result on faster court really don't understand tennis that well. Commentators are excluded because their job were to talk up about the big rivalry between Federer vs Nadal. It's a dud since it only happens a few months a year.
 

The tennis guy

Hall of Fame
Fedexeon said:
But remember that last year he was the defending champion in Madrid. So people would expect more from him. I would call it a disappointment for his results after Wimbledon.

Since you have too high hope for him on faster court. Yes, he played great at Wimbledon, but his draw was really soft - I know people don't want to hear it. His draw was soft last year at Madrid also except final against Ljubicic.

He is doing what I expected of him on faster court. His result on faster court depends on his draw a lot because many players can beat him, and do beat him.
 

psamp14

Hall of Fame
i voted after the match was over, yes, but i did mention federer just crushing nalbandian in another thread...

did bandy end up not blogging? lol...
 

SteveI

Legend
The tennis guy said:
Exactly. People who are REALLY surprised of Nadal's result on faster court really don't understand tennis that well. Commentators are excluded because their job were to talk up about the big rivalry between Federer vs Nadal. It's a dud since it only happens a few months a year.

Hi,

The ATP Tour is hard way to make a living. The players have found the hole in his game on the medium to fast courts. Play the ball hard to his FH.. Blake did it.. Berdych does it all the time. I think Fed has seen the tapes... Once he moves back to get more time to hit his big whippy FH.. they get on top of the point.. and it is over. On the clay and slower courts... forget it he is still the King..

Regards,
Steve
 
The tennis guy said:
Exactly. People who are REALLY surprised of Nadal's result on faster court really don't understand tennis that well. Commentators are excluded because their job were to talk up about the big rivalry between Federer vs Nadal. It's a dud since it only happens a few months a year.

Actually even during those few months when they play on surfaces Nadal is comfortable on it is still a dud since Federer does not challenge him enough during that part of the year either. Federer is 0-4 vs Nadal on clay, and 1-5 on slower higher bouncing hard courts/clay combined.
 

superman1

Legend
And there it is. Outside of clay, Nalbandian doesn't stand a chance against Fed. He was down 2 sets to 0 in the Master's final and I've never seen Federer look as tired as he did in the 5th set, so that's a fluke win. Nadal and Safin are still Fed's biggest threats. Nalbandian shouldn't have even been in this match. Safin was clearly the better player in the 3rd set of their match, and he lost entirely because of a bad call.
 
Well looking at their last 8 meetings, it would suggest clay is the only place Nalbandian has a shot against a healthy Fed. The ironic thing is clay is Nalbandian's worst surface, which shows how far it is Federer's worst surface.
 
Top