Watcher said:We'll see. I think Nalbandian knows that he could have (and probably would have) beaten Fed at Roland Garros this year if he hadn't had to retire. He's going to be thinking about that moment between now and when he steps on to the court.
Andres Guazzelli said:I want Nalbandian to win, but I don't see it happening.
Federer in 3, probably 6-2 the 3rd set...
lol you mean 25% of 2nd serves won otherwise he would've made a new record for DF's in a match for sure!dscw said:nalby had only 25% 2nd serve percentage.....
Rob_C said:I think the results here, and the rest of the year prove Fed is the man, and that Nadal is one-dimensional, and that the players will continue to figure him out, sorta like they figured out the Williams sisters. Wouldnt be surprised to see Nadal start to get beaten on clay next year. It's happened to all of the previous dominant clay courters, Courier, Bruguera, Moya, Ferrero, Coria.
I'm predicting Fed wins the French next year. You heard it here first.
And you're surprised???? LOL. :mrgreen:oscar_2424 said:Wow Federer totally destroy Nalbandian
Grimjack said:Not only didn't I hear it here first, this isn't even the first YEAR I heard it.
Why do we go through this same crap every year? Are most of you just too simple to remember results more than a month at a time?
This is the fast court season. Nadal is a non-factor here. Even though, around the beginning of June, when the slow court season has just ended and we have to hear how Nadal has "really changed and elevated his game, and is now a threat everywhere, and will soon challenge for GOAT!!!!!," we nonetheless don't have to pay heed to such idiocy.
Likewise, when Federer has just dominated the next three-quarters of the tennis calendar, that doesn't mean Nadal will have suddenly forgotten how to win on his only really great surface.
Every year -- same crap.
Nadal won't be "for real -- an all-surface threat!!!" four months from now when he's winning clay tournaments and looking good on the snail-slow hardcourts at places like Miami and Dubai.
And he's not "disappointing" now. He's just the same player he's always been. One-dimensional and deadly at any venue that rewards a willingness to park five feet behind the baseline and run balls down all day.
"Figured him out?" Players don't HAVE to figure him out. He's obvious. FANS have to figure him out. He's nigh-unstoppable on slow, and highly vulnerable everywhere else. Why must we make this into rocket science?
Grimjack said:And he's not "disappointing" now. He's just the same player he's always been. One-dimensional and deadly at any venue that rewards a willingness to park five feet behind the baseline and run balls down all day.
"Figured him out?" Players don't HAVE to figure him out. He's obvious. FANS have to figure him out. He's nigh-unstoppable on slow, and highly vulnerable everywhere else. Why must we make this into rocket science?
Fedexeon said:But remember that last year he was the defending champion in Madrid. So people would expect more from him. I would call it a disappointment for his results after Wimbledon.
The tennis guy said:Exactly. People who are REALLY surprised of Nadal's result on faster court really don't understand tennis that well. Commentators are excluded because their job were to talk up about the big rivalry between Federer vs Nadal. It's a dud since it only happens a few months a year.
The tennis guy said:Exactly. People who are REALLY surprised of Nadal's result on faster court really don't understand tennis that well. Commentators are excluded because their job were to talk up about the big rivalry between Federer vs Nadal. It's a dud since it only happens a few months a year.