Head Graphene Prestige Pro vs Babolat Pure Strike 16x19?

henweezy

Rookie
Can anyone compare the two in terms of playability? What did you like and not like about these racquets?
Talking about the non-XT Graphene Prestige Pro and the older (2014) black and red Babolat Pure Strike 16x19.
 

projectone7

Rookie
I played for a while with the Graphene Prestige Pro. The common agreement on TT was that it was an abomination and a deviation from the classic buttery Prestige feel, but I thought it was a solid stick. The feel was lacking a bit, but I solved that with some lead at 3 and 9, and a leather grip. Overall, in stock form, the Prestige was a solid all-court racket. Good amount of spin, but low powered, as usual. The Pure Strike 16x19 was a joy to hit with. I added tungsten putty inside the trapdoor, which added more whip to my forehand. The PS gave a plenty amount of spin and power, but was kinda iffy as net. Unlike the Prestige, which was solid all around, the Pure Strike felt a bit unstable at net. Overall, I preferred the Prestige, but it required quite a bit of modification. Stock, I would go with the PS 16x19.
 

TR3NT

Rookie
A guy I hit with went from the Graphene Prestige Pro to the red Strike 16 x 19 to the new white Pure Strike 16 x 19 and has decided out of those 3 he prefered the Graphene Prestige Pro the best. I personally think he played the best with the red strike 16 x 19 but he said he prefers the stiffer feel and the weight distribution of the Prestige.
 

Matthew Lee

Professional
I played for a while with the Graphene Prestige Pro. The common agreement on TT was that it was an abomination and a deviation from the classic buttery Prestige feel, but I thought it was a solid stick. The feel was lacking a bit, but I solved that with some lead at 3 and 9, and a leather grip. Overall, in stock form, the Prestige was a solid all-court racket. Good amount of spin, but low powered, as usual. The Pure Strike 16x19 was a joy to hit with. I added tungsten putty inside the trapdoor, which added more whip to my forehand. The PS gave a plenty amount of spin and power, but was kinda iffy as net. Unlike the Prestige, which was solid all around, the Pure Strike felt a bit unstable at net. Overall, I preferred the Prestige, but it required quite a bit of modification. Stock, I would go with the PS 16x19.
The Graphene Prestige Pro comes with a leather grip...did you add another one?
 

henweezy

Rookie
Yea. The one I received was used, because I was cheap. The guy who had it before took the leather off because it was "blistering his hands" (JUST PUT ON AN OVERGRIP)

I still get blisters on my hands even with a tourna grip over the leather grip. Haha After it's been used for a bit, of course. I typically change overgrips only when they start slipping out of my hand.
 

Matthew Lee

Professional
I still get blisters on my hands even with a tourna grip over the leather grip. Haha After it's been used for a bit, of course. I typically change overgrips only when they start slipping out of my hand.
I get blisters with Tourna every once in a while, especially if it's colder outside. I tend to use Wilson Pro or Yonex Super Grap unless it's really hot, and my hands are sweating quite a lot.
 

henweezy

Rookie
I've played with the graphene prestige MP extensively up until about a month and a half ago when I switched to the pure strikes 16x19. While the GPMP was great at everything, after a while I was not able to swing them anymore due to not being able to play as often as I'd like. Hence me looking for a lighter, more forgiving and open racquet.

The strike does everything great but it feels a little unstable on volleys. I want to add lead at 3 and 9, but they already come in at around 325 SW and 11.6 strung. Feels decently head-heavy with 16g poly strings as well. The LISTED specs on TW sounded like it was within my range, but of course I forget about Babolat's poor QC. I think I may try to pick up a graphene prestige pro and try them out side by side for 1-2 months and maybe report back here!
 
Top