cuddles26 said:Although I like Roger, he really has no chance of actually beating Roddick in the final with the way Andy is playing. The question is how tough a win would it be for Roddick?
If only I knew for sure . . .justineheninhoogenbandfan said:Are you more of an alien or a hamster?
alienhamster said:If only I knew for sure . . .
My guess is hamster, but I need to consult my parents on that one to be sure. I do know they're part Welsh.
3 easy sets.. hmmm, doubt it.... Home crowd, conors would have him pumped, he's using his serve 2 greater effect he's used 2 havin the ball come back from his serve at this stage, increased confidence, better tactics... I believe fed will win but easy i think not...flymeng said:How about 3 easy sets for Roger? He will neutralize Andy's one dimensional serve. :mrgreen:
superman1 said:Roddick certainly has the tools to beat Federer, if Fed isn't playing his best stuff and Roddick is hitting screaming serves and forehands. Anything can happen in this sport. Blake had 3 set points to take the first set against Fed. He choked it all away (as many players seem to do) and suddenly he is disillusioned and gets bagelled in the next set. These guys all have the game to beat Federer, they just need to put it all together.
FEDEXP said:I get the feeling over here sometimes that this is a personal Ouja Board for some-they feel that if they put the energy out here it will make it so.
cuddles26 said:Although I like Roger, he really has no chance of actually beating Roddick in the final with the way Andy is playing. The question is how tough a win would it be for Roddick?