I must say the guy that looks like federer is photoshopped pretty good as well
Watching Federer play Giraldo now at US Open. Same 90 sq. in. racquet.
yup- also i noticed he's wearing his white socks higher than the black socks
yup- also i noticed he's wearing his white socks higher than the black socks
I hate unsymmetrical rackets, it makes me very fussy about what way I hold the racket.
True. But I'm sure some on these boards were eyeballing it and saying 'that looks awfully big'.Watching Federer play Giraldo now at US Open. Same 90 sq. in. racquet.
True. But I'm sure some on these boards were eyeballing it and saying 'that looks awfully big'.
I think it's hilarious that so many people make such a big deal on how the racket looks, yet are probably the same lot of you who complain about pros using paintjobs. Me thinks the pros know something most of y'all don't. It's not about how the racket looks, it's about how it performs. Just my opinion. LOL
True. But I'm sure some on these boards were eyeballing it and saying 'that looks awfully big'.
It looks as though the Williams Sisters were brought in for their style "expertise" on the paint scheme?
So what you're saying is if the racquet were pink you would play with it? Of course, pj matters its a $200 racquet you want it to look good of course performance is a given. I didn't mind the other paint jobs from the past 3 versions with the nCode being the best one I think but this pj version is not up to par.
Very interesting video, thanks for sharing.
Bigger head size indeed....
It's the same head size...
You're dashing their Conspiracy Theories! LOL!ARE THE SAME RACQUET
At the handle?
Heck, that looks more like an 85 than a 90 to me. Maybe Federer has indeed switched racquets? He's gone SMALLER!!! :lol:
Heck, that looks more like an 85 than a 90 to me. Maybe Federer has indeed switched racquets? He's gone SMALLER!!! :lol:
that looks like a 85 to me too
No, his 90 is really 90 sq. in.Isn't his 90' actually about an 88' or something like that? Or am I confusing this with a different racquet?
This racquet with the BLX90 paintjob in his hand from the 2011 US Open sure looks to be about the same size as his old PS 6.0 85. :shock:
C'mon guys, it's just a camera angle (you can see racquet face turned slightly towards the camera)
Other photos where racquet looks huge - it's because of camera lens, there is definitely an optical distortion.
Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear.
I hope Wilson brings back the 17mm beam width or smaller instead of the 17.5mm for better agility. Even though it's a small difference I noticed from extensive testing it takes slightly more time to prepare for the shot with the BLX (17.5mm) compared to the Ncode (17mm). Your swing slows down a tad with the BLX because of the beam width and I don't like that at all.
With the weight being what it is a thinner beam makes the racquet more nimble and this is why I stayed with the Ncode 6.1.
Anyone else with comments, as I haven't seen any discussions regarding the beam width.
Cheers.
Look 2:03.. same old racket as ever..
Imo Federer doesn't need a bigger racket, what would he gain.. extra power and less control? Why would Federer need extra power and less control?
Going "all the way" would be going to the Big Bubba. Now, THAT'S "going all the way"!! :shock:wow lots of discussion going. i hope he goes to 95. since hes doing it he might as well skip 93 and go all the way baby!
Um...because he hits the ball differently, uses different grips, uses a two-handed backhand, plays exclusively from the baseline, etc...........need I go on?I dunno? Why does Djokovic need a 100 instead of the 93?
Um...because he hits the ball differently, uses different grips, uses a two-handed backhand, plays exclusively from the baseline, etc...........need I go on?
^Exactly. Different styles need different tools.