Okay, here we go again, another poster who will defend their point when they are obviously dead wrong. It would not be possible for your post to be any more wrong.
This is apples and oranges. The Williams sisters played and beat every top junior, they were dominant. Their dad pulled them at age 12 AFTER they had demolished everyone.
Then they trained with some great players. They beat up the top boys in practice. Roddick said they would rip the racquet out of his hands with their shots.
So what if a few people said you could not have 2 champions in the family? Many others were lining up to sponsor the girls. They had major TV outlets and sports mags predicting their success.
This Deja had NO success at ANY age. Anyone who watches her does not see anything special.
That is 100000000% different than the Williams sisters. Your comparison is just wrong and trying to defend it is just silly.
Many of us have been around tennis a long time. By 14 you can tell a ton about the girls. This girl has zero, none, nada chance at making a penny at tennis where as the Williams sisters were as close to a sure bet by age 14.
Same with LeBron James. His high school games were on TV. About 90% of people said he was a sure thing, the rest were wrong. Same with the Williams sisters. 90% of people said they were a sure thing by age 14...who cares about the 10% dummies who were wrong?
You could not find even 1 tennis expert who would watch this girl and see her record and say she will be a tennis success, not one. This isn't 3rd grade, everyone wins, everyone can be a Princess. This is the real world....people bet money on Venus and Serena at age 13-14, ain't no one putting a dime on this girl.
You are silly.
It seems that you are dead set on arguing some point which has
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with anything I said.
My point, and I'll explain it to you once again, is that so-called "tennis experts" (who have more qualifications than anyone on this messageboard) have been very wrong in the past. For an example, I gave the Williams sisters and Jennifer Capriati.
You only have to read the articles from pundits a few years back when it was said that Serena was "too fat" to win another grandslam. She ended up winning the Australian open that year.
If I cared to continue this conversation any further, I could post several articles with quotes from McEnroe, Evert, Austin, etc...stating either the Williams sisters would not make it as pros, would not win grand slams, etc...because they didn't have the proper training, proper junior tournament resume, etc.
That is my point and it is quite simple.
Nowhere did I compare the game of Deja to the game of Serena or Venus.
Like I said earlier, keep telling people what they can and cannot do, and you will be proven wrong many times over.
Besides what exactly do you get out of discouraging someone?
Wouldn't it be better to use your "expertise" to point out what they need to work on instead of telling them what they will never do?