Is anyone surprised at the lack of attention Federer has gotten at Wimbledon this year considering he's won it 8 times and played 20 consecutive years

40-15_forever

New User
Life moves on. I don't think there is anything shocking about Fed not being center stage anymore since he hasn't played Wimbledon in several years.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Fed's history and reputation at Wimbledon is set in stone for all time but the fact is he's not playing this year and attention is focussed on the renewed rivalry between Djokovic and Nadal and the Slam race. That's all.
Do you think Fed's Wimbledon record entitles him to a staue in his honour?
 

Phoenix*

Professional
Wimbledon & AO are about Djokovic. If you haven't noticed.

Nadal, Djokovic's pigeon, has RG still.

Fed is the past.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
Like when John McEnroe decided to stay away from Wimbledon in 1986 and 1987 and thought people would really notice. They didn't. They carried on just fine without him.
 

Permitlady

Professional
Don't expect coverage to shoot themselves in the foot. The NBA almost died because it obsessed over Jordan. This is why Federer will not say he retired to keep the revenue coming in.
 

prosperned

Professional
Very sad tbh. The same fate awaits Djoko and Nadal so annoying taking joy from this is quite a sad troll.

Although I do hope Nadal’s 14 RGs will be the exception to the ‘forgotten great’.

Only Rod Laver’s CYGS is brought up when past players are mentioned
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
Why did he do that? Injury?
No, his personal choice. In January 1986, McEnroe was beaten at the Masters in New York by Brad Gilbert, the only time that McEnroe lost to Gilbert in his career. McEnroe responded by leaving tennis for months, and decided not to return for Wimbledon. The tournament carried on just fine without him. The following year, McEnroe again decided not to play Wimbledon, and again the tournament carried on just fine without him.
 

Start da Game

Hall of Fame
people have moved on.....it is only his fans who are still living in the past.....there are a lot of exciting young players in the mix like alcaraz.....why to worry about a player whose career ended 3 years ago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH

vamos22

Rookie
The tour doesn't seem to miss him at all considering he's supposed to be the biggest universal box office player of all time.
I suspect as time goes on, Federer will be known as the guy who Nadal toppled at his very peak in 2008 in the fading light. Or as one of two guys Nadal dominated on the biggest stage throughout their career. One of the big 3 but ultimately secondary attraction to the main event.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
He's not playing. What attention do you expect?
They should be saying viewing figures are down, ticket sales are down, advertising revenue is down, sale of merchandise is down and interest in tennis in general has plummeted. That's what they said would happen without Federer.
 

ffw2

Hall of Fame
They should be saying viewing figures are down, ticket sales are down, advertising revenue is down, sale of merchandise is down and interest in tennis in general has plummeted. That's what they said would happen without Federer.
Federer won your attentions tho.

Does the rest of it matter? :unsure:
 

Legend of Borg

G.O.A.T.
Some of the posting here is super childish crap.

Your favorite player just won the last two slams and is looking primed to be (most likely) cemented as the all-time GS leader if he wins Wimbledon. He's the leading GOAT candidate and could possibly accomplish the CYGS this year in his mid-30s. Crazy stuff.

No, this isn't enough. We need to crap on Federer's legacy and diss him even though he's one of the main rivals of Djokodal who made them up their game and produced numerous classic matches along with the other two.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Some of the posting here is super childish crap.

Your favorite player just won the last two slams and is looking primed to be (most likely) cemented as the all-time GS leader if he wins Wimbledon. He's the leading GOAT candidate and could possibly accomplish the CYGS this year in his mid-30s. Crazy stuff.

No, this isn't enough. We need to crap on Federer's legacy and diss him even though he's one of the main rivals of Djokodal who made them up their game and produced numerous classic matches along with the other two.
They both have beaten Fedr more times than he has beaten them. How did he make them up their game? It's the opposite.
 

Federev

Legend
Life moves on. I don't think there is anything shocking about Fed not being center stage anymore since he hasn't played Wimbledon in several years.
Attendance at Wimbledon is markedly down from very recent past years. (Check it, it’s true).

This is the first time in over 22 years Fed is not in the draw.

Not a coincidence.

There you go.

/thread
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
You guys don't miss him.

But a lot of other people do.
How do you know? The commentators don't mention him and they spoke to people queuing for tickets at Wimbledon and none of the ones they spoke to mentioned Federer.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 791948

Guest
Sampras hardly ever gets a mention, so I'm not surprised :happydevil:
Nobody mentions my grandfather since he died either, and he was king of the castle 8-B
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
I suspect as time goes on, Federer will be known as the guy who Nadal toppled at his very peak in 2008 in the fading light. Or as one of two guys Nadal dominated on the biggest stage throughout their career. One of the big 3 but ultimately secondary attraction to the main event.

"throughout their career" lololol

Raf has been helpless against Djokovic and Federer off clay for 8 years.
 

vamos22

Rookie
"throughout their career" lololol

Raf has been helpless against Djokovic and Federer off clay for 8 years.
Slam h2h since 2014:
Nadal Federer 2-2
Nadal Djokovic 3-4

Wouldn’t call 5-6 score as helpless lol. Career Nadal is ahead. 10-4 fed 11-7 Djokovic. Shows who the better big game player is.
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
Slam h2h since 2014:
Nadal Federer 2-2
Nadal Djokovic 3-4

Wouldn’t call 5-6 score as helpless lol. Career Nadal is ahead. 10-4 fed 11-7 Djokovic. Shows who the better big game player is.

Didn't know the tour was only 4 tournaments

Also, I only count three Slam meetings between them since 2014. If you want to include the 2014 AO then it would be more accurate to say since 2013, or "since the beginning of 2014"
 
Last edited:

Federev

Legend
How do you know? The commentators don't mention him and they spoke to people queuing for tickets at Wimbledon and none of the ones they spoke to mentioned Federer.
You mean the people who are coming to Wimbledon?

You mean - The people who are not the ones not coming?
 

vamos22

Rookie
Didn't know the tour was only 4 tournaments

Also, I only count three Slam meetings between them since 2014. If you want to include the 2014 AO then it would be more accurate to say since 2013, or "since the beginning of 2014"
Between 2014-2022 Nadal is 2-2 in slams vs Federer. Mickeymouse matches in doha and Beijing are irrelevant when comparing who is the better player
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
Between 2014-2022 Nadal is 2-2 in slams vs Federer. Mickeymouse matches in doha and Beijing are irrelevant when comparing who is the better player

Well, I drew the line at post-2014 for a reason, because Nadal fell off a cliff vs Djok then too.

And I don't see Doha or Beijing in the list of matches in that time period. I see one 500 (Fed), three Slams (2-1 Fed), and four M1000s (all Fed).
 

vamos22

Rookie
Well, I drew the line at post-2014 for a reason, because Nadal fell off a cliff vs Djok then too.

And I don't see Doha or Beijing in the list of matches in that time period. I see one 500 (Fed), three Slams (2-1 Fed), and four M1000s (all Fed).
feel free to cherry pick all you like, old fed was better than old fed in the h2h off clay sure.
Overall career Rafa was better h2h on clay and outdoor hc. in both slams and smaller atp events.
 
Top