Spencer Gore
Legend
There are interesting similarities in the careers of Mike Tyson and Roger Federer -obviously not in their temperament or approach to their respective sports, but in terms of their career trajectories.
Both emerged at the tale end of a period dominated by an all time great of the sport (Holmes/Sampras), both defeated the former great when they had passed their peak (Tyson v Holmes, Federer v Sampras); both completely dominated the competition for a relatively brief period (Tyson 87-90, Federer 2004-2007) against good but historically weak opposition (Berbick, Spinks/ Hewitt, Roddick). Both of them were -prematurely-praised as the greatest of all time early in their careers. Both lost their air of complete dominance after key defeats (Douglas/Nadal at Wimbledon). Both managed to regain major titles but never regained their former dominance. Both failed to dominate the stronger competition that came along as they had once dominated the field (Holyfield, Lewis/Nadal, Djokovic). Both managed to stay as title contenders till their mid-30s (though Federer has outlasted Tyson in that respect).
Even rabid fans of both agree that they underwent a serious decline in ability after only 3/4 years at the top, leaving them incapable of dominating as they once did.
Roger Federer -the Mike Tyson of tennis?
Thoughts?
Both emerged at the tale end of a period dominated by an all time great of the sport (Holmes/Sampras), both defeated the former great when they had passed their peak (Tyson v Holmes, Federer v Sampras); both completely dominated the competition for a relatively brief period (Tyson 87-90, Federer 2004-2007) against good but historically weak opposition (Berbick, Spinks/ Hewitt, Roddick). Both of them were -prematurely-praised as the greatest of all time early in their careers. Both lost their air of complete dominance after key defeats (Douglas/Nadal at Wimbledon). Both managed to regain major titles but never regained their former dominance. Both failed to dominate the stronger competition that came along as they had once dominated the field (Holyfield, Lewis/Nadal, Djokovic). Both managed to stay as title contenders till their mid-30s (though Federer has outlasted Tyson in that respect).
Even rabid fans of both agree that they underwent a serious decline in ability after only 3/4 years at the top, leaving them incapable of dominating as they once did.
Roger Federer -the Mike Tyson of tennis?
Thoughts?