Airspun
Professional
it's going great, we have five new 4.0s who are really D1 University of Arizona hopeful 5.5s.Cashman asked me to ask you how the recruiting of sandbaggers is going?
it's going great, we have five new 4.0s who are really D1 University of Arizona hopeful 5.5s.Cashman asked me to ask you how the recruiting of sandbaggers is going?
I just figured if you think people would burn a tennis court in response to a hindrance call, then you might be an incendiary person who would do crazy things and defend crazy people.
I figured you might be in the camp that thinks the first amendment protects things like conspiring to commit a crime.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The first amendment allows me to not understand it.So you assumed, well you know how that can go.
Also you need study the First Amendment to the US Constitution, how you’ve referred to it in this thread, it’s pretty clear you don’t understand it.
Add that to the list I guess.
Maybe this will help
Hey @Slicerman - don't be so distractible, don't nitpick about hindrances. Slicerman, you're the person nobody likes, trust Dartagnan64.stamping of feet is almost always done to distract since even split steppers don't "stamp". That would be the most inefficient movement ever to elevate so high you could stomp on the ground.
I always split jump when at the net to being one way or the other. It's done to create some uncertainty in th opponent as to whether I'm poaching or not. Never in my life, even when I weighed 2 bills did it sound like a stamp.
So I think it's fine to call it a hindrance if you were hindered by the sound. If the opponent makes a good case, replay the point. If they fess up, take the point.
Of course I'd advise you as a player to learn not to be so distractible and focus on your shot. That's much more likely to serve you well in the long run over nitpicking about hindrances. Nobody likes that guy, trust me.
stamping of feet is almost always done to distract since even split steppers don't "stamp". That would be the most inefficient movement ever to elevate so high you could stomp on the ground.
I always split jump when at the net to being one way or the other. It's done to create some uncertainty in th opponent as to whether I'm poaching or not. Never in my life, even when I weighed 2 bills did it sound like a stamp.
So I think it's fine to call it a hindrance if you were hindered by the sound. If the opponent makes a good case, replay the point. If they fess up, take the point.
Of course I'd advise you as a player to learn not to be so distractible and focus on your shot. That's much more likely to serve you well in the long run over nitpicking about hindrances. Nobody likes that guy, trust me.
True. And as someone who has coached many league teams (as well as int'l ranked juniors and pros) I can aver that rec players can easily be distracted by anything and everything. I remember once after a match I asked a guy on a 4.0 team I coached who had lost what happened. The guy said his opponent did this, and did that, and did this...I stopped him and asked 'what did YOU do?', he just stared at me. And another time when I asked someone what happened he said 'I can't believe he played with his shirt tucked in!'--I resigned from coaching that team on the spot. Often people focus too much on what their opponents are doing rather than what they are doing.Of course I'd advise you as a player to learn not to be so distractible and focus on your shot. That's much more likely to serve you well in the long run over nitpicking about hindrances. Nobody likes that guy, trust me.
This is the tennis version of being Rick rolled !coincidentally this hit my feed...
TL;DR
* pro player has a habit of very heavy split stepping, and very active feet *throughout* a point
* a hindrance was called by the ref, for "distracting split stepping"
* the call was overturned (ref was wrong) & point replayed...
* demonstrates that high level athletes actually move alot, make alot of noise, distracting or not, it's part of the game...
* moral of the story: focus on your game instead of trying to game your opponents by nitpicking rules...
ha, fair... but was not my intentionThis is the tennis version of being Rick rolled !
Ignorance is bliss….The first amendment allows me to not understand it.
It should be. I remember hitting a woman in the chest for raking her foot across some clay as I was playing shots. I had asked her not to do it. So it may not be a hindrance but it can certainly have consequences.I'm just wondering what the rule is and curious what everyone thinks about this..
In a doubles match, if the net guy of the opposing team stomps their foot right before I play my shot, could that be considered an hindrance?
I think they were trying to trick me into thinking that they were making a move. It was quite audible and intentional as they did it numerous times and randomly.
I can't believe that the best team in your league did the old "look over there" and then served underhand while you were looking. This seems like something that would be put in a slapstick youtube video of exaggerated tennis behavior.Wait, what ? The last paragraph is far more interesting than everything else said so far here. Made you look behind you and then underhand served you ?? That’s incredibly bush league if true.
I can’t believe OP didn’t make that the title and topic of his post, that behavior is far more outrageous than stomping feet.I can't believe that the best team in your league did the old "look over there" and then served underhand while you were looking. This seems like something that would be put in a slapstick youtube video of exaggerated tennis behavior.
For me the distinction is this: The split step is an athletic move (also employed in other sports, soccer and basketball among them); stamping one's feet is not. ergo it may be construed as serving no useful purpose other than to cause distraction.Depends what you mean by 'stomping'. If someone is split-stepping or moving that's legit. If it's done simply to generate noise and distract that's hindrance.
Yes if done intentionally to distract you. If just faking a poach, no.I'm just wondering what the rule is and curious what everyone thinks about this..
In a doubles match, if the net guy of the opposing team stomps their foot right before I play my shot, could that be considered an hindrance?
I think they were trying to trick me into thinking that they were making a move. It was quite audible and intentional as they did it numerous times and randomly.
Classy move. You can kill someone with a chest hit, btw.It should be. I remember hitting a woman in the chest for raking her foot across some clay as I was playing shots. I had asked her not to do it. So it may not be a hindrance but it can certainly have consequences.
I’m guessing most rec league warriors probably aren’t hitting the ball hard enough to pull that off. Also, upon your suggested googling, a tennis ball isn’t hard enough, and it’s like a two square inch area that you’d have to hit. So I guess, technically, it could happen, but this is a wild claimClassy move. You can kill someone with a chest hit, btw.
Google commotio cordis.
It's hard enough and it's happenedI’m guessing most rec league warriors probably aren’t hitting the ball hard enough to pull that off. Also, upon your suggested googling, a tennis ball isn’t hard enough, and it’s like a two square inch area that you’d have to hit. So I guess, technically, it could happen, but this is a wild claim
When. When did it happen on a rec league tennis court?It's hard enough and it's happened
Well...I guess its a chance I'll have to take there Bud. I say everyone should just play the game like normal people and everything else will take care of itself.Classy move. You can kill someone with a chest hit, btw.
Google commotio cordis.
I'm just wondering what the rule is and curious what everyone thinks about this..
In a doubles match, if the net guy of the opposing team stomps their foot right before I play my shot, could that be considered an hindrance?
I think they were trying to trick me into thinking that they were making a move. It was quite audible and intentional as they did it numerous times and randomly.
That did not go over well. LOL.
Can either player sing "Glad All Over"?If you are REALLY old, you can recall the interview with the Dave Clark 5.
They said the only difference between them and this other group called the "Beatles"
was that the DC5 stomped, and the Beatles clapped.
Tell the net guy that you are a Beatles fan and that you will call a hindrance if he does another DC5 stomp, but Beatles claps are fine.
That way he has his racket under his armpit while you are hitting your shot! WINNING!!!!!!
I should have mentioned that I didn’t call a hinderance. I just explained the rule and tried to do it as a polite warning.The two best ways to start an argument on a tennis court:
1. Use the words "foot fault" in any context at all
2. Call a hindrance on someone that is clearly trying to hinder you
Funny you mention grunting. In general, I don't mind grunting. I might occasionally grunt from time to time. But a couple of weeks ago I was playing a casual doubles match and one of the opponents had a really loud and DELAYED grunt.. the guy probably grunts about 1 or 2 seconds after the ball has left his racquet. He didn't really hinder me, except one time when I was trying to volley his shot, in which he grunted right as I was about hit my volley.. I ended up shanking the ball into the net..Not totally related but I was playing doubles last fall. The team we were playing against had a guy that was a really loud grunt/yeller