TheTennisReporter
Semi-Pro
Kyrgios once again with a dig at Carreno Busta
Kyrgios once again with a dig at Carreno Busta
It's sometimes less than the difference between te top 10 and top 15, and always less than the gap between 10 and 20.I can't stand when people do that. And I'm talking about Harrison, not Kyrgios.
PCB only got to the top 10 and made the WTF because of that 17 USO SF run. You can't use those accolades as reasons why we shouldn't be surprised those accolades exist. That's not how logic works.
I can't stand when people do that. And I'm talking about Harrison, not Kyrgios.
PCB only got to the top 10 and made the WTF because of that 17 USO SF run. You can't use those accolades as reasons why we shouldn't be surprised those accolades exist. That's not how logic works.
If you cant stand Harrison here but are okay with Kyrgios's line of reasoning in his now deleted tweet, I think we should just leave logic aside altogether. Logic doesn't work that way either. And I don't even like red hat Ryan.I can't stand when people do that. And I'm talking about Harrison, not Kyrgios.
PCB only got to the top 10 and made the WTF because of that 17 USO SF run. You can't use those accolades as reasons why we shouldn't be surprised those accolades exist. That's not how logic works.
Racism? Just because he is spanish
Kyrgios once again with a dig at Carreno Busta
He is a bogan. What else do you expect from him?"wouldn't of"
underrated commentKyrgios is just a typical tennis talk user.
Isn't his mother some kind of Malaysian princess or something?He is a bogan. What else do you expect from him?
Nick's obviously an ***. There's no defending a stupid comment like that, everyone jumping on him for that is completely right.If you cant stand Harrison here but are okay with Kyrgios's line of reasoning in his now deleted tweet, I think we should just leave logic aside altogether. Logic doesn't work that way either. And I don't even like red hat Ryan.
PCB was a top 40 player by Aug 2016, top 30 player by Nov 2016, top 20 player by March 2017, top 15 player by July 2017. Do you see a trend here? All that before USO 2017.
Isn't his mother some kind of Malaysian princess or something?
Kyrgios has been spending too much time on TTW
His IW and Miami SF were runs were pretty similar to his meme USO SF run
Why was it stupid what harrison said?Nick's obviously an ***. There's no defending a stupid comment like that, everyone jumping on him for that is completely right.
Just wanted to point out that what Harrison said was stupid too. Rothenberg is a moron, but he didn't say anything wrong. Anyone who follows tennis knows the 17 USO was a ****show and there's a reason that was the only semi he's ever made.
You are welcome to your opinion of course, and no disrespect intended, but I don't see it that way (and yes, I do follow tennis avidly). You emphasized on reasoning and logic in your post I responded to, and right now your comment doesn't really echo any of that to me. Keeping in mind the ranking trend I mentioned, PCB was already a top 15 player by July 2017 before USO getting most of his points by playing on hard courts from Aug till March stretch. How is Harrison stupid? And how is Rothenberg right? If anything it should be less of a surprise given the trajectory PCB was on and his results on hard courts. Reaching semis, sure, he wasn't top 4 but is it really that big of a stretch like being claimed?Just wanted to point out that what Harrison said was stupid too. Rothenberg is a moron, but he didn't say anything wrong. Anyone who follows tennis knows the 17 USO was a ****show and there's a reason that was the only semi he's ever made.
I strongly disagreeAm I right in thinking Ben Rothenberg is a bit of a knob?
Regardless of that 'logic', doesn't take away the fact that PCB is more accomplished a player on paper all day long.His IW and Miami SF were runs were pretty similar to his meme USO SF run
Big if true“If tennis racquets didn’t exist he wouldn't be a top ranked player“
True if bigBig if true
PCB made the semis because that was the most depleted field we'd ever seen. It's ridiculous to ignore that and pretend he just had this incredible week where all the work he'd done came together or whatever feel good story you want to spin.You are welcome to your opinion of course, and no disrespect intended, but I don't see it that way (and yes, I do follow tennis avidly). You emphasized on reasoning and logic in your post I responded to, and right now your comment doesn't really echo any of that to me. Keeping in mind the ranking trend I mentioned, PCB was already a top 15 player by July 2017 before USO getting most of his points by playing on hard courts from Aug till March stretch. How is Harrison stupid? And how is Rothenberg right? If anything it should be less of a surprise given the trajectory PCB was on and his results on hard courts. Reaching semis, sure, he wasn't top 4 but is it really that big of a stretch like being claimed?
On top of that, a player doesn't determine who his opponent is going to be, fairly illogical bit that one but remains a fan favorite among TTWers. Like I said, willing to discuss further but then lets leave logic aside and stick with subjective takes and 'cupcake draws' rhetoric etc.
PCB made the semis because that was the most depleted field we'd ever seen. It's ridiculous to ignore that and pretend he just had this incredible week where all the work he'd done came together or whatever feel good story you want to spin.
He played 4 qualifier in a row to reach the quarters and then beat #29 seed Schwartzman to reach the semis before losing to #28 seed Anderson. It was not a quality tournament for him and we all know it. There's a reason he hasn't come close to sniffing another semi-final since. We don't need to pretend otherwise just for the sake of being nice.
Yeah, and lets all completely ignore his trajectory up until July of that year which is a big factor in this discussion, claim that subjective takes such as opponent across the net are somehow logical, and instead suggest I'm "spinning" it to make it a feel good story when all I have presented are facts. I think we are done here. Still no answer to how Harrison was wrong btw. Nice talk.PCB made the semis because that was the most depleted field we'd ever seen. It's ridiculous to ignore that and pretend he just had this incredible week where all the work he'd done came together or whatever feel good story you want to spin.
He played 4 qualifier in a row to reach the quarters and then beat #29 seed Schwartzman to reach the semis before losing to #28 seed Anderson. It was not a quality tournament for him and we all know it. There's a reason he hasn't come close to sniffing another semi-final since. We don't need to pretend otherwise just for the sake of being nice.
MeatTornado definitely has changed to focus of his argument from:Yeah, and lets all completely ignore his trajectory up until July of that year which is a big factor in this discussion, claim that subjective takes such as opponent across the net are somehow logical, and instead suggest I'm "spinning" it to make it a feel good story when all I have presented are facts. I think we are done here. Nice talk.
to:I can't stand when people do that. And I'm talking about Harrison, not Kyrgios.
PCB only got to the top 10 and made the WTF because of that 17 USO SF run. You can't use those accolades as reasons why we shouldn't be surprised those accolades exist. That's not how logic works.
PCB made the semis because that was the most depleted field we'd ever seen. It's ridiculous to ignore that and pretend he just had this incredible week where all the work he'd done came together or whatever feel good story you want to spin.
He played 4 qualifier in a row to reach the quarters and then beat #29 seed Schwartzman to reach the semis before losing to #28 seed Anderson. It was not a quality tournament for him and we all know it. There's a reason he hasn't come close to sniffing another semi-final since. We don't need to pretend otherwise just for the sake of being nice.
And why ignore the downward trajectory since? That has more to do with the "yes, that happened" quote than anything else. If had kept up even a semblance of his pace at the time it wouldn't be a funny thing to look back on now, which it clearly is.Yeah, and lets all completely ignore his trajectory up until July of that year which is a big factor in this discussion, claim that subjective takes such as opponent across the net are somehow logical, and instead suggest I'm "spinning" it to make it a feel good story when all I have presented are facts. I think we are done here. Still no answer to how Harrison was wrong btw. Nice talk.