Novak Djokovic beat Roger Federer 7-6(5), 1-6, 7-6(4), 4-6, 13-12(3) in the Wimbledon final, 2019 on grass
Djokovic was the defending champion and this win gave him his 5th title at the venue. It was also his 4th Slam off the last 5 played. Federer was playing in a record extending 12th final (matching the women's record of Martina Navratilova) and had been gunning for a record extending 9th title. He had previously lost finals to Djokovic in 2014 and 2015
Djokovic won 204 points, Federer 218
Serve Stats
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (137/219) 63%
- 1st serve points won (101/137) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (39/82) 48%
- Aces 10 (1 second serve), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (51/219) 23%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (127/203) 63%
- 1st serve points won (111/127) 87%
- 2nd serve points won (39/76) 51%
- Aces 25 (1 not clean), Service Winners 3
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (69/203) 34%
Serve Pattern
Djokovic served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 5%
Federer served...
- to FH 52%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Djokovic made...
- 128 (67 FH, 61 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 41 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (8 FH, 5 BH)
- 28 Forced (15 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (128/197) 65%
Federer made...
- 159 (72 FH, 87 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 39 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (4 FH, 5 BH)
- 30 Forced (15 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (159/210) 76%
Break Points
Djokovic 3/8 (4 games)
Federer 7/13 (10 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Djokovic 40 (16 FH, 17 BH, 3 FHV, 4 OH)
Federer 63 (28 FH, 10 BH, 11 FHV, 8 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 5 OH)
Djokovic's FHs - 6 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 2 longline, 1 drop shot (possibly accidental) and 1 return net chord dribbler
- BHs - 4 cc (2 passes - 1 not clean), 9 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 cc pass at net, 1 inside-out/longline pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- FHVs - 1 swinging pass (not a net point), 1 drop and 1 diving
- 1 OH was played net to net
Federer's FHs - 6 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (2 passes), 9 inside-out (Djokovic fell down for 1), 4 inside-in, 3 drop shots (Djokovic fell down for 1), 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net played at very fine angle and 1 at net
- BHs - 7 dtl (2 returns, 1 pass), 1 inside-out/longline and 2 drop shots
- 9 from serve-volley points
- 7 first volleys (4 FHV, 3 BHV), 2 of the FHVs being swinging shots
- 2 second volleys (2 FHV), 1 a stop, the other a drop
- 2 other FHVs were swinging shots, 2 BHVs were drops and 1 OH was played net to net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Djokovic 77
- 48 Unforced (21 FH, 25 BH, 2 BHV)
- 29 Forced (16 FH, 12 BH, 1 Challenge)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.7
Federer 107
- 70 Unforced (41 FH, 27 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 37 Forced (17 FH, 19 BH, 1 FH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.1
(Note 0: the Forced Error challenge marked for Djokovic occurred as he got back in play a difficult ball that would have been marked forced error had he not. He was in a hopeless position with Federer at net to likely put away an easy winner when the challenge was made. Its been judged 'forced error')
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Djokovic was...
- 18/33 (55%) at net
Federer was...
- 47/61 (77%) at net, including...
- 11/13 (85%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/11 (82%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
As a spectacle, this match is hard to beat - defending champion, top seed and world number 1 vs record holder, 2nd seed who beat world number 2 third seed in semis... 12 titles and 16 finals between the pair going to 5 sets. Loser winning more points than the winner. First ever 5th set tiebreak at 12-12 - a rule implemented this year after a series of extended 5th sets in the last few years. 5 stars for spectacle, 5 stars for the struggle but... its not a very good tennis match by the standards of the players involved. Other than Federer's serving, nothing either player does stands out for quality. 1 good tiebreak from Djokovic and 2 bad ones from Federer settle the matter
Its also a misunderstood match, the usual take being one of Roger Federer choking to lose. He chokes in 2/3 tiebreaks all right - which is more than bad enough - but the usual take on his choking in failing to serve out the match is in my opinion, grossly exaggerated
40-15... Choke?
The part everyone remembers. Federer serves for the title, 8-7 in the fifth set. He advances to 40-15 with back to back aces (in other words, he's got his fill of points for the game from the big serve) and has 2 championship points. First he tries to runaround a decent return to hit a FH inside-out winner but misses... an UE, but very much the type of shot he was playing. Next point, he forces the issue by coming to net only for Djokovic to hit a clutch FH cc pass. Next point, he's outmuscled from the baseline (having played the type of 3rd ball BH that he avoided in going for the runaround FH winner on his first championship point) and forced into an error. Finally, he's broken, netting a routine FH
Compare that to the previous game, where Djokovic blows a 30-0 lead to get broken with 2 bad FH UEs (I'd say just 1 of Federer's 2 was bad - the other isn't 'good' obviously, but part and parcel of how he plays) and Federer making a great pass (similar to the one Djokovic made next game)
I don't see a difference... if Federer 'choked' to not serve out the match, Djokovic choked at least as much to give him the chance in the first place... why all the censure for Federer alone?
Almost the exact same thing happened earlier in the set, but in reverse order (and with even worse playing quality). Federer was broken to go down 4-2 (3 BH UEs - 2 of them winner attempts - from Fed and a great Djokovic BH cc pass winner). Next game, Djoko was broken (points he lost include a double fault, missing a routine BH and an attacking FH)…. this is just as 'chokey' as what happened later. How is Federer's 'choke' in game 16 any worse than Djoko's in game 7?
In a nutshell, Federer deserves criticism for a great many things in this match (which we'll get to in a bit), among them failing to serve out the match... but not to anything like the extent he's gotten, which is akin to reducing a 6 hour interview to a 1 line soundbite and thinking you've covered everything
Serve & Return
Djokovic's serve is at best decent on the whole. No great power, no great placement... but are down from his norm. So how does he win a lofty 74% first serve points?
Federer's return is ordinary, a bit less than decent... though that might be his norm in the period in question. You can see Fed forces 28 return errors and Djoko forces 30.... but the ones Fed forces are significantly more forced. By contrast, Fed misses a large number of 'makeable returns'... first serves of decent power but neither deep nor wide. The kind of ball a good returner should at least get in play (and a great returner, like Djokovic's norm, may well punish)
Fed does little punishing of even the second serve, let alone first
It would be an uphill task to punish Federer's first serve, by contrast. He serves excellently throughout - power and placement - and Djokovic doesn't seem to read it. Djokovic however, is quite capable of doing just that as he's proved many times before, including the finals of 2014-15
This day though, he's not upto the task. Note the 13 UEs, very high for Djokovic. And very few of those deep penetrating returns he's known for. In addition to missing so many returns, Djoko isn't particularly damaging with the ones he makes. He has just the 1 winner (which is a fluke net chord dribbler), while Federer has 2. Far from snatching initiative of the point with the return as is his norm, Djoko can't even neutralize the servers advantage... and Federer is allowed to play 3rd balls with a healthy initiative, regularly even off his second serves
Djokovic was the defending champion and this win gave him his 5th title at the venue. It was also his 4th Slam off the last 5 played. Federer was playing in a record extending 12th final (matching the women's record of Martina Navratilova) and had been gunning for a record extending 9th title. He had previously lost finals to Djokovic in 2014 and 2015
Djokovic won 204 points, Federer 218
Serve Stats
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (137/219) 63%
- 1st serve points won (101/137) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (39/82) 48%
- Aces 10 (1 second serve), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (51/219) 23%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (127/203) 63%
- 1st serve points won (111/127) 87%
- 2nd serve points won (39/76) 51%
- Aces 25 (1 not clean), Service Winners 3
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (69/203) 34%
Serve Pattern
Djokovic served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 5%
Federer served...
- to FH 52%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Djokovic made...
- 128 (67 FH, 61 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 41 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (8 FH, 5 BH)
- 28 Forced (15 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (128/197) 65%
Federer made...
- 159 (72 FH, 87 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 39 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (4 FH, 5 BH)
- 30 Forced (15 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (159/210) 76%
Break Points
Djokovic 3/8 (4 games)
Federer 7/13 (10 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Djokovic 40 (16 FH, 17 BH, 3 FHV, 4 OH)
Federer 63 (28 FH, 10 BH, 11 FHV, 8 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 5 OH)
Djokovic's FHs - 6 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 2 longline, 1 drop shot (possibly accidental) and 1 return net chord dribbler
- BHs - 4 cc (2 passes - 1 not clean), 9 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 cc pass at net, 1 inside-out/longline pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- FHVs - 1 swinging pass (not a net point), 1 drop and 1 diving
- 1 OH was played net to net
Federer's FHs - 6 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (2 passes), 9 inside-out (Djokovic fell down for 1), 4 inside-in, 3 drop shots (Djokovic fell down for 1), 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net played at very fine angle and 1 at net
- BHs - 7 dtl (2 returns, 1 pass), 1 inside-out/longline and 2 drop shots
- 9 from serve-volley points
- 7 first volleys (4 FHV, 3 BHV), 2 of the FHVs being swinging shots
- 2 second volleys (2 FHV), 1 a stop, the other a drop
- 2 other FHVs were swinging shots, 2 BHVs were drops and 1 OH was played net to net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Djokovic 77
- 48 Unforced (21 FH, 25 BH, 2 BHV)
- 29 Forced (16 FH, 12 BH, 1 Challenge)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.7
Federer 107
- 70 Unforced (41 FH, 27 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 37 Forced (17 FH, 19 BH, 1 FH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.1
(Note 0: the Forced Error challenge marked for Djokovic occurred as he got back in play a difficult ball that would have been marked forced error had he not. He was in a hopeless position with Federer at net to likely put away an easy winner when the challenge was made. Its been judged 'forced error')
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Djokovic was...
- 18/33 (55%) at net
Federer was...
- 47/61 (77%) at net, including...
- 11/13 (85%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/11 (82%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
As a spectacle, this match is hard to beat - defending champion, top seed and world number 1 vs record holder, 2nd seed who beat world number 2 third seed in semis... 12 titles and 16 finals between the pair going to 5 sets. Loser winning more points than the winner. First ever 5th set tiebreak at 12-12 - a rule implemented this year after a series of extended 5th sets in the last few years. 5 stars for spectacle, 5 stars for the struggle but... its not a very good tennis match by the standards of the players involved. Other than Federer's serving, nothing either player does stands out for quality. 1 good tiebreak from Djokovic and 2 bad ones from Federer settle the matter
Its also a misunderstood match, the usual take being one of Roger Federer choking to lose. He chokes in 2/3 tiebreaks all right - which is more than bad enough - but the usual take on his choking in failing to serve out the match is in my opinion, grossly exaggerated
40-15... Choke?
The part everyone remembers. Federer serves for the title, 8-7 in the fifth set. He advances to 40-15 with back to back aces (in other words, he's got his fill of points for the game from the big serve) and has 2 championship points. First he tries to runaround a decent return to hit a FH inside-out winner but misses... an UE, but very much the type of shot he was playing. Next point, he forces the issue by coming to net only for Djokovic to hit a clutch FH cc pass. Next point, he's outmuscled from the baseline (having played the type of 3rd ball BH that he avoided in going for the runaround FH winner on his first championship point) and forced into an error. Finally, he's broken, netting a routine FH
Compare that to the previous game, where Djokovic blows a 30-0 lead to get broken with 2 bad FH UEs (I'd say just 1 of Federer's 2 was bad - the other isn't 'good' obviously, but part and parcel of how he plays) and Federer making a great pass (similar to the one Djokovic made next game)
I don't see a difference... if Federer 'choked' to not serve out the match, Djokovic choked at least as much to give him the chance in the first place... why all the censure for Federer alone?
Almost the exact same thing happened earlier in the set, but in reverse order (and with even worse playing quality). Federer was broken to go down 4-2 (3 BH UEs - 2 of them winner attempts - from Fed and a great Djokovic BH cc pass winner). Next game, Djoko was broken (points he lost include a double fault, missing a routine BH and an attacking FH)…. this is just as 'chokey' as what happened later. How is Federer's 'choke' in game 16 any worse than Djoko's in game 7?
In a nutshell, Federer deserves criticism for a great many things in this match (which we'll get to in a bit), among them failing to serve out the match... but not to anything like the extent he's gotten, which is akin to reducing a 6 hour interview to a 1 line soundbite and thinking you've covered everything
Serve & Return
Djokovic's serve is at best decent on the whole. No great power, no great placement... but are down from his norm. So how does he win a lofty 74% first serve points?
Federer's return is ordinary, a bit less than decent... though that might be his norm in the period in question. You can see Fed forces 28 return errors and Djoko forces 30.... but the ones Fed forces are significantly more forced. By contrast, Fed misses a large number of 'makeable returns'... first serves of decent power but neither deep nor wide. The kind of ball a good returner should at least get in play (and a great returner, like Djokovic's norm, may well punish)
Fed does little punishing of even the second serve, let alone first
It would be an uphill task to punish Federer's first serve, by contrast. He serves excellently throughout - power and placement - and Djokovic doesn't seem to read it. Djokovic however, is quite capable of doing just that as he's proved many times before, including the finals of 2014-15
This day though, he's not upto the task. Note the 13 UEs, very high for Djokovic. And very few of those deep penetrating returns he's known for. In addition to missing so many returns, Djoko isn't particularly damaging with the ones he makes. He has just the 1 winner (which is a fluke net chord dribbler), while Federer has 2. Far from snatching initiative of the point with the return as is his norm, Djoko can't even neutralize the servers advantage... and Federer is allowed to play 3rd balls with a healthy initiative, regularly even off his second serves