Dominic Thiem beat Rafael Nadal 6-4, 6-3 in the Rome quarter-final, 2017 on clay
Thiem would go onto lose in the next round to Novak Djokovic. It was Thiem's second win over Nadal. The two had played finals in Barcelona and Madrid shortly before, with Nadal winning both
Thiem won 75 points, Nadal 62
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (41/67) 61%
- 1st serve points won (28/41) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (15/26) 58%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (12/67) 18%
Nadal....
- 1st serve percentage (53/70) 76%
- 1st serve points won (29/53) 55%
- 2nd serve points won (9/17) 53%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (13/70) 19%
Serve Patterns
Thiem served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 2%
Nadal served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 76%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 57 (15 FH, 42 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 8 Forced (8 BH)
- Return Rate (57/70) 81%
Nadal made...
- 53 (20 FH, 33 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 10 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 6 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (53/65) 82%
Break Points
Thiem 4/8 (5 games)
Nadal 1/7 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Thiem 22 (13 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 3 OH)
Nadal 20 (12 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Thiem's FHs - 7 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl, 4 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl and 1 net chord dribbler return
- 1 FHV was a swinging shot and 1 OH was on the bounce
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc and 1 dtl pass
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Thiem 27
- 19 Unforced (10 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 non-net swinging FHV
- 8 Forced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.9
Nadal 41
- 25 Unforced (15 FH, 10 BH)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 8 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 8/10 (80%) at net, with...
- 1/1 forced back
Nadal was...
- 11/16 (69%) at net, with...
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Inspired showing from Thiem as he collars baseline action with gusto and calculated risk, Nadal adjusts accordingly - first, falling back to try weather the storm and later, upping the bossiness of his own play - but Thiem's able to sustain a very high standard in his beefed up game and gets the better of things
Right from the start, Thiem is belting the cover off the ball. Off both sides. The BHs look as big as the FHs and the FHs are huge. He goes for adventurous point ending shots, particularly FH inside-out, and usually makes them. He slams BH cc's pushing Nadal back. There's power theres, loads of spin, there's wrong footing shots, the works
Just on power alone, Thiem's hitting is potentially overwhelming. Throw in exaggerated spin on the FH in particular and doubly so. He hits attackingly wide - not too risky, but attacking - on top of it. Flattens out the odd shot and hits it particularly deep. And throws in the point ending shots. And remains pretty consistent doing all that
Its high end, beat-down power baselining at least and upped from there to attacking, with measued shot making chances thrown in.
Initially, Nadal's forced back behind the baseline. This isn't a Nadal falling-back-when-slightly-attacked thing - he's pounded back. Runs about counter-punching pretty well and doesn't give up unduly soft balls (which would have been likely outcome against what he's faced). Occasionally has no answer - and Thiem strikes a winner. And sometimes Thiem misses
In second set, Nadal subtley steps up more (figuritively & literally) to contest for command of play. Starts hitting wider and moving Thiem around. Goes for his own winners, particularly but not exclusively off the FH (usually with success). And starts working his way to net to finish - which takes immaculate judgment and point construction. Thiem's hitting is about the most uninviting of net play as imaginable
Thiem plays the same way, but control of rallies is more up for grabs now. The greater moving-opponent-around dynamic implemented by Nadal (as opposed to hit through/beat-down play of firs set) opens up chances for him to wrong foot Nadal - and there some stunning shots where he does that. His power is such that if he hits in unanticipated direction, its likely to end the point
The match has come out nicely in numbers (as in, they accurately capture play)
Thiem would go onto lose in the next round to Novak Djokovic. It was Thiem's second win over Nadal. The two had played finals in Barcelona and Madrid shortly before, with Nadal winning both
Thiem won 75 points, Nadal 62
Serve Stats
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (41/67) 61%
- 1st serve points won (28/41) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (15/26) 58%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (12/67) 18%
Nadal....
- 1st serve percentage (53/70) 76%
- 1st serve points won (29/53) 55%
- 2nd serve points won (9/17) 53%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (13/70) 19%
Serve Patterns
Thiem served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 2%
Nadal served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 76%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Thiem made...
- 57 (15 FH, 42 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 8 Forced (8 BH)
- Return Rate (57/70) 81%
Nadal made...
- 53 (20 FH, 33 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 10 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 6 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (53/65) 82%
Break Points
Thiem 4/8 (5 games)
Nadal 1/7 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Thiem 22 (13 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 3 OH)
Nadal 20 (12 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Thiem's FHs - 7 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl, 4 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl and 1 net chord dribbler return
- 1 FHV was a swinging shot and 1 OH was on the bounce
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc and 1 dtl pass
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Thiem 27
- 19 Unforced (10 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 non-net swinging FHV
- 8 Forced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.9
Nadal 41
- 25 Unforced (15 FH, 10 BH)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 8 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Thiem was...
- 8/10 (80%) at net, with...
- 1/1 forced back
Nadal was...
- 11/16 (69%) at net, with...
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Inspired showing from Thiem as he collars baseline action with gusto and calculated risk, Nadal adjusts accordingly - first, falling back to try weather the storm and later, upping the bossiness of his own play - but Thiem's able to sustain a very high standard in his beefed up game and gets the better of things
Right from the start, Thiem is belting the cover off the ball. Off both sides. The BHs look as big as the FHs and the FHs are huge. He goes for adventurous point ending shots, particularly FH inside-out, and usually makes them. He slams BH cc's pushing Nadal back. There's power theres, loads of spin, there's wrong footing shots, the works
Just on power alone, Thiem's hitting is potentially overwhelming. Throw in exaggerated spin on the FH in particular and doubly so. He hits attackingly wide - not too risky, but attacking - on top of it. Flattens out the odd shot and hits it particularly deep. And throws in the point ending shots. And remains pretty consistent doing all that
Its high end, beat-down power baselining at least and upped from there to attacking, with measued shot making chances thrown in.
Initially, Nadal's forced back behind the baseline. This isn't a Nadal falling-back-when-slightly-attacked thing - he's pounded back. Runs about counter-punching pretty well and doesn't give up unduly soft balls (which would have been likely outcome against what he's faced). Occasionally has no answer - and Thiem strikes a winner. And sometimes Thiem misses
In second set, Nadal subtley steps up more (figuritively & literally) to contest for command of play. Starts hitting wider and moving Thiem around. Goes for his own winners, particularly but not exclusively off the FH (usually with success). And starts working his way to net to finish - which takes immaculate judgment and point construction. Thiem's hitting is about the most uninviting of net play as imaginable
Thiem plays the same way, but control of rallies is more up for grabs now. The greater moving-opponent-around dynamic implemented by Nadal (as opposed to hit through/beat-down play of firs set) opens up chances for him to wrong foot Nadal - and there some stunning shots where he does that. His power is such that if he hits in unanticipated direction, its likely to end the point
The match has come out nicely in numbers (as in, they accurately capture play)