Most seasons with multiple slam finals in Open era history.

[Leandro2045]

Nadal : 11 (2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2019, 2022
Djokovic : 10 (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021)
Federer : 8 (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2015, 2017)
Lendl : 6 (1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1989)
Sampras : 5 (1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 2000)
Borg : 5 (1976, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981)
Connors : 5 (1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1982)

 

[MichaelNadal]

He better slay

 

[UnderratedSlam]

As I said many times, Nadal will end up beating most "longevity" records, despite everybody being convinced RF would out-do him in this respect by a wide margin...

The irony of it all. Ten years ago Federer fans were absolutely convinced Nadal would have a far shorter career and much shorter stay at the top.

The arrogance.

 

[ibbi]

The key one, if my math is right, is that if he wins the final he joins his brothers in the Idiot Fanbase Brigade on 6 years of multiple wins.

 

[Leandro2045]

This is an extremely impressive stat when you add that Nadal have to withdraw from around 10 slam tournaments during this period.

 

[alexio]

multiple slam wins per season is more tasty..so nadal has 6 and djoko has 6 but djoko wins thanks to three times 3+seasons while nadal has 1

 

[Sampras-Bruguera 1993]

I guess Difference is Nadal overcame his injuries, Fed didn't. That and Nadal is an alien on clay

 

[duaneeo]

I'm still awaiting the day when Nadal fans can praise Nadal without mentioning the name "Federer".

 

[UnderratedSlam]

I'm still awaiting the day when Nadal fans can praise Nadal without mentioning the name "Federer".

Visit the threads from 2009, 2010, and you will know why...

 

[MichaelNadal]

I'm still awaiting the day when Nadal fans can praise Nadal without mentioning the name "Federer".

You must not see my posts

 

[GabeT]

multiple slam wins per season is more tasty..so nadal has 6 and djoko has 6 but djoko wins thanks to three times 3+seasons while nadal has 1

Does it make any real difference though? Would we think more (or less) of Nadal if he had won the same number of slams but in a different fashion (say more 3 slam years but less multiple slam years)?

 

[alexio]

Does it make any real difference though? Would we think more (or less) of Nadal if he had won the same number of slams but in a different fashion (say more 3 slam years but less multiple slam years)?

i guess yes

 

[duaneeo]

Visit the threads from 2009, 2010, and you will know why...

No thanks. I have no desire to visit threads from 12-13 years ago.

 

[AnOctorokForDinner]

The key one, if my math is right, is that if he wins the final he joins his brothers in the Idiot Fanbase Brigade on 6 years of multiple wins.

What an ingenious name for the three of them, I lol'd. Makes you think, maybe they did really helped ruin the sport and the alternate timeline with no Fedalovic present would've been much better, morally speaking.

 

[GabeT]

No thanks. I have no desire to visit threads from 12-13 years ago.

Tennis didn’t even exist back then

 

[UnderratedSlam]

No thanks. I have no desire to visit threads from 12-13 years ago.

It wasn't meant literally...

 

[Sport]

.