6, i don't expect him to go all out against a qualifier in the first round. he'd do just enough to beat him comfortably.
That was a very bad performance indeed. I'm not so sure he will raise is game enough as the tournament only gets harder.
Not looking good for Nadal and his fanboys.
Not looking good for Nadal and his fanboys.
Nadal's doing pretty well, I think, considering how exhausted he is.
Murray is half of the draw is looking really easy with guys like wawrinka, and nadal in it.
Nah Djokovic has it easier with that clown Federer in his draw.
Last time I checked, 13 is a bigger number than 6:lol:
Typical Nadal first round match at RG. Doing just enough to win. The courts were very lively. I think a little rain could help Nadal get in his comfort zone. Balls are flying right now.
I don't think his knee is an issue. It's just that Madrid hurt his confidence that he now has to regain somehow. Ridiculous that tournament in altitude is a week before the French Open.This is no match for rating, but here is what I noticed... He's having problem with his right knee and he is hiding it. He put his right hand on it several times. He did not appear in 100% shape.
I don't think his knee is an issue. It's just that Madrid hurt his confidence that he now has to regain somehow. Ridiculous that tournament in altitude is a week before the French Open.
I think I'll take Nadal's word over yours. Thank you very much.You must be kidding, his loss at Madrid has no effect on his confidence whatsoever, if anything it will make him work even harder.
And I am getting tired of that altitiude thing, there is only about 1700 feet dfference in the altitude compared to paris which is no big deal at all.
It was warm and dry as well in Madrid. It would have to be like 100 degrees in paris and 10% humidity for the ball to bounce like it did in Madrid.warm weather can have the same effect as that much altitude would've had.
So yeah, keep praying for clouds and rain and wind blowing from Nadal to his opponents.
You forgot the wind. Remember he needs three elements, wind, cloud and the moon in correct position.
Maybe you mistakened it with Nadal saving his energy. No need to go all out in your first round match. It's a marathon. Not a sprint.No, Nadal played very impressive... as I said in my first post here this was no match for rating because what really mattered was straight set win.
But dont be surprised if his knee gives him trouble in his next couple of matches. I thought he was nursing it a little bit.
Roger didn't play that well either. Come on, it's the first round. did you guys think they would strain themselves? Now simon had a horrible first round.
You should learn to know something about tennis.Nadal should really work on his endurance.
You should learn to know something about tennis.
I watch a lot of tennis though as well as what the players mention. Amazing how much you can learn without even picking up a racquet. And I used to play a lot. Frustrating sport. lolLMAO! from your own testimony, you don't even play, and you tell someone else to learn something about tennis. MOMO.
Nadal will be alright. Afterall, he doesnt have to deal with Djoker before the finals. He should be able to cakewalk through decently and have a lot of gas left in the tank come finals time whereas Djoker and Fed will prolly battle it out.
I don't think his knee is an issue. It's just that Madrid hurt his confidence that he now has to regain somehow. Ridiculous that tournament in altitude is a week before the French Open.
It was warm and dry as well in Madrid. It would have to be like 100 degrees in paris and 10% humidity for the ball to bounce like it did in Madrid.
When you see players having success with a certain type of game plan over and over, you are learning about tennis. Then you see what other players try to do to counter it. The more tennis you watch, the more you understand the game.
When you see players having success with a certain type of game plan over and over, you are learning about tennis. Then you see what other players try to do to counter it. The more tennis you watch, the more you understand the game.
We are not capable of pulling off that high level of tennis. Not all of us are physically gifted athletically. Yes I can see why you think you can gain more understanding but it's limited to your potential by itself. I played tennis off and on for 10 years until my physical limits came. I hurt my shoulder and knee.Yes and no. The only way to get a deep understanding of tennis is to pick up a tennis racquet and play at as high level as you are capable of. Then you start to get a whole different perspective.
When you see players having success with a certain type of game plan over and over, you are learning about tennis. Then you see what other players try to do to counter it. The more tennis you watch, the more you understand the game.
We are not capable of pulling off that high level of tennis. Not all of us are physically gifted athletically. Yes I can see why you think you can gain more understanding but it's limited to your potential by itself. I played tennis off and on for 10 years until my physical limits came. I hurt my shoulder and knee.
Probably true but I broke down physically. Too much alcohol and poor mechanics probably were the downfall for me. My serve in particular had bad form. I preferred longer points to get in a rhythm. I did get to 4.0's though.It's easy to say that you are incapable if you don't work hard and train. If you do, I think everyone can reach 4.5. That's high enough to start understanding pro matches at a whole different level based completely on your on-court experience. I am not saying it's the ultimate level, but it's much much better than you can attain simply by watching.