Berdych had the best careerAmong the guys that could've won many majors if the big three never existed. Names that comes to mind are Ferrer, Berdych, Roddick, Murray of course... Who do you think would have been the GOAT of the 2000-2019 era in that scenario?
Berdych definitely has the best looking woman of all of them. LOLBerdych had the best career
Before even clicking, I thought of Berdych, Roddick and Murray .. in that order.
Who's Ferrer?
Losses in slams during QF or later to the big 3:
Roddick: 10
Nishi: 8
Berdych: 9
Ferrer: 9
Murray: 18
whose
Qui se soucie de savoir si c'est qui ou qui.Right. I'm French, sorry.
Wawa lost 8 times in QF's or later, but like 14 times if you count round 4.Raonic? Wawrinka? Soderling? Good old Verdasco?
Ferrer could have won a few Rolland-Garros.
whose
Before even clicking, I thought of Berdych, Roddick and Murray .. in that order.
Who's Ferrer?
When she looked down a little bit, something about her reminded me of Ferrer with longer hair and crazy eyesBerdych had the best career
I want to know if Zoro gave you permission to post on a tennis site.Among the guys that could've won many majors if the big three never existed. Names that comes to mind are Ferrer, Berdych, Roddick, Murray of course... Who do you think would have been the GOAT of the 2000-2019 era in that scenario?
Nope, whose.Nup, who's.
Why in that order?
Nope, whose.
"Player who is career has been stolen..." doesn't sound right.
verdasco's is way more attractive.Berdych definitely has the best looking woman of all of them. LOL
I think Davydenko would have won the AO in 2006.Baghdatis would have won the australian open
Verdasco too!
Poor AndyLosses in slams during QF or later to the big 3:
Roddick: 10
Nishi: 8
Berdych: 9
Ferrer: 9
Murray: 18
And he only beats them when they´re injured or playing half-form or when they´re nervous about completing the Career Slam...Wawrinka would have 0 slams, he only wins against Djokodal
And he only beats them when they´re injured or playing half-form or when they´re nervous about completing the Career Slam...
Stan the Luckanimal.
We are talking about outsiders facing Big 3 in their early slam finales.Not many slams will count if the excuse is more important than the result.
Federer got nervous in Wimbledon = Luckyvic.
Medvedev got nervous in NY = Luckdal.
Stan beat Djokovic + Nadal AO14, Federer + Djokovic RG15, Del Potro + Djokovic USO16 to win his slams.
It’s weird that’s Nadal and Muray have never played in a GS final. However, they’ve played each other 6 times in the semis (with Nadal holding a 5-1 record) and the craziest stat of all is that one of them took part in every slam final from AO 2010-RG 2014 and yet they still somehow managed to never cross paths with one another at that stage.Roddick is a tempting answer, but he would have 5 Slams (all US and W) to his current total of 1. He still had a pretty solid career.
Murray is probably the best answer, as he would have 11 GS titles instead of his current 3.
Both of these guys only lost Finals to Federer or Djokovic, Nadal wasn't that big a factor for them.
It’s weird that’s Nadal and Muray have never played in a GS final. However, they’ve played each other 6 times in the semis (with Nadal holding a 5-1 record) and the craziest stat is that one of them took part in every slam final from AO 2010-RG 2014 and still they somehow managed to never play each other at that stage.
FedererAmong the guys that could've won many majors if the big three never existed. Names that comes to mind are Ferrer, Berdych, Roddick, Murray of course... Who do you think would have been the GOAT of the 2000-2019 era in that scenario?
3x !Kevin Anderson would be a grand slam winner, imagine that!
3x !
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
3x !
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
im honestly astounded thar he reached 3 gs finals
imo, so many better players have not achieved that
He won the first set in his only slam finale and had a set point to go up 2-0. If he had won this point, who knows how tennis may have turned out at the top. Djokovic would have lost the match probably and been 0-2 in slam finales.Tsonga is the first who comes to my mind. Not the most stable player mentally, but big serve, big forehand, solid backhand, can play at the net, good athlete... he was a grand slam material as much as anyone.
Amazing indeed. Reminds me how Germany and Brazil never played in a World Cup game until the 2002 final, despite having won between them 7 out of the 16 tournaments played up to that point, one of them having been in the final in 12 out of the 16 previous editions (three of the exceptions being the pre second world war world cups, so one of them wasn't in the final since 1950 only on 1978), and one or both having been in the semis in 15 out the 16 tournaments.It’s weird that’s Nadal and Muray have never played in a GS final. However, they’ve played each other 6 times in the semis (with Nadal holding a 5-1 record) and the craziest stat is that one of them took part in every slam final from AO 2010-RG 2014 and yet they still somehow managed to never cross paths with one another at that stage.
It’s weird that’s Nadal and Muray have never played in a GS final. However, they’ve played each other 6 times in the semis (with Nadal holding a 5-1 record) and the craziest stat is that one of them took part in every slam final from AO 2010-RG 2014 and yet they still somehow managed to never cross paths with one another at that stage.