The Official Angell Users Club

My experience is completely opposite. TC100 is way more stable at the same specs. Lead tape is needed for TC95 to reach the same stability.
My experience is completely opposite. TC100 is way more stable at the same specs. Lead tape is needed for TC95 to reach the same stability.
i agree about lead tape on tc 95. Also use lead on tc 100. Small amout1g@1239. However i notied quite a bit vibration when hitting above the sweet spot especially on low volleys or touh shots. Almost feels like frame has a weak spot on it. Very strange. No such problem with tc 95
 

Carreau

Semi-Pro
I would recommend to check the grommets for damages - such vibrations are unusual ones. I have 6 units of TC100 and non of them behaves as you have described. Which iteration you have by the way? Copper? Previous one?
 

Rysty

Rookie
I have no problems with stability, but i remember there was some discussion of vibrations some time ago, so you're not the only one. I have never felt those vibrations, but i think if you feel them -and it's not a grommet problem- there is not much you can do. Maybe try small amounts of lead tape in different locations? That should affect the resonations/ vibrations.
 
i agree about lead tape on tc 95. Also use lead on tc 100. Small amout1g@1239. However i notied quite a bit vibration when hitting above the sweet spot especially on low volleys or touh shots. Almost feels like frame has a weak spot on it. Very strange. No such problem with tc 95
I would recommend to check the grommets for damages - such vibrations are unusual ones. I have 6 units of TC100 and non of them behaves as you have described. Which iteration you have by the way? Copper? Previous one?
I have V2 version. Two idential . only one frame reats this way. When i hit the strings with the heel of my hand the good racquet gives a clean live clear vibe( great). The bad frame all things the same weightstrings etc. when i hit the strings on the frame it produe a dead thud..very board like!
r
 

Brian H

New User
Has anyone tried getting a custom buttcap cover from RoyalRacquets for B-shape grip? If so, which model racquet did you choose? I lost the buttcap cover on my TC95 and would rather not pay 15 euros plus shipping for an exact replacement
 

emhtennis

Professional
I love putting brand new grommets on my Angells. It feels like getting your car detailed. And it calms the urge to want to buy new/different rackets because with new grommets it looks and feels almost brand new again!
 

emhtennis

Professional
In the spirit of experimentation, I've dropped tension from my normal 49lbs all the way down to 42lbs on my TC97 18x20.

It's been a long time since I've changed anything on my setup, but I'm curious to see what will happen. String is Black Knight 18g. The hope/goal is to make it easier to hit heavy balls with a little more launch angle.

I'm playing in about 2 hours so I'll report back.
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
In the spirit of experimentation, I've dropped tension from my normal 49lbs all the way down to 42lbs on my TC97 18x20.

It's been a long time since I've changed anything on my setup, but I'm curious to see what will happen. String is Black Knight 18g. The hope/goal is to make it easier to hit heavy balls with a little more launch angle.

I'm playing in about 2 hours so I'll report back.

Let us know how you go.

You could also try to have a 3 lbs differential between the Mains and Crosses (I strung mine at 45M/42C - if full poly, and I tend to keep the same tension if the poly is in the mains and a syn gut/ multi/ gut is in the crosses). My strings are also 18 gauge.

The tension differential will increase the launch angle of the string bed and aid with the spin.
 

Blahovic

Professional
The past 2 days I've played with the Angell TC95 v4. Specs are 27.25 inches long, 315g unstrung, 310 balance and 16x19.

This racquet is really cool. Monster on serves when I get my timing right. Forehand is nice, but racquets never bother me too much on my forehead. Slice is good. Backhand is up and down but that's more because of me than the racquet. I don't personally feel a huge lack of control, although I play with relatively high tension poly. Ball maybe sails slightly on really flat shots.

The D beam is notably helpful for swinging through the air faster and generating slice of topspin.

I'm interested to try a non-extended version now + a TC100.
 

FloWin

New User
Does anyone know if the V4 TC95 is going to be available in 70RA anymore? Did they phase this option out or are they just out of stock?? Thanks!
 

krikamons

Rookie
Does anyone know if the V4 TC95 is going to be available in 70RA anymore? Did they phase this option out or are they just out of stock?? Thanks!

a year or so ago i talked to them on the phone and they said they had stopped making the ra70 - there was apparently not enough difference between the two. don't know if that is still the case
 

Mirdad

Semi-Pro
I'm curious if anyone has the latest version (4) TC97 16x19? If so, does it still have the "dead spot" at the top of the hoop? I've been reading many of the older posts and some say that V3 did not have this effect. Would like to verify this is true..........
 

Happi

Hall of Fame
I'm curious if anyone has the latest version (4) TC97 16x19? If so, does it still have the "dead spot" at the top of the hoop? I've been reading many of the older posts and some say that V3 did not have this effect. Would like to verify this is true..........

V3 and V4 same racquet, new paintjob. New paintj9b V4 is excellentand dosn’t crack like the Copper V3.
 

Mirdad

Semi-Pro
V3 and V4 same racquet, new paintjob. New paintj9b V4 is excellentand dosn’t crack like the Copper V3.
Yes, V4 looks absolutely stunning. But do you have any feedback if the "dead zone" in the upper hoop is no longer an issue. Personally, I don't mind some flex in the hoop just was wondering if there was still a "dead zone?"
Thanks.......

P.S.......Just read some of the posts from Ed70 as he has many years of experience using the TC97 16x19 pattern and says he hasn't found any "dead zone" near the top of the hoop. I like to hit the ball near the top of the sweet spot but that's not too close to the top of the hoop so I don't think there will be an issue of a "dead zone" for me. I like a little flex in the racquet and enjoy the extra cupping or dwell time. I also like to string a full bed of Quadro Twist at 44# so that certainly helps dwell time too. Looking forward getting my new wand in the next week or so.......
 
Last edited:

esm

Legend
just received 2 x reels of Halo Multi, one blue and one red (previously known as Halo 3...)
Paul told me last year that they have new manufacture for the strings and the colours will be different (same formula).

the Halo 3 Teal is no more... the new Halo Multi (blue) is more of a Cyan colour... lol
 

ed70

Professional
I'm curious if anyone has the latest version (4) TC97 16x19? If so, does it still have the "dead spot" at the top of the hoop? I've been reading many of the older posts and some say that V3 did not have this effect. Would like to verify this is true..........

"dead spot" was a myth, ive used the frame V2's for over 4 years & V3's / V3 octagon never noticed it, must hit the sweet spot 100%. Anyway top of hoop in my eyes is next to the top of the frame, i dont advise anyone to hit the ball here with any tennis racquet.
 

StanAO14

Semi-Pro
"dead spot" was a myth, ive used the frame V2's for over 4 years & V3's / V3 octagon never noticed it, must hit the sweet spot 100%. Anyway top of hoop in my eyes is next to the top of the frame, i dont advise anyone to hit the ball here with any tennis racquet.
Haha
 

ed70

Professional
been hitting with a tc101 recently, picked one up part curiosity & part couldnt think of anything else i wanted to spend my money on. Cold here in UK so season doesnt really kick in until April & not a fan of squeeky feet indoor tennis & the ridicoulous cost.
its been a while since i played larger than a 97/8 head outside of a quick hit with local coach's demo racquets.
Anyway strung with ghost wire / black knight hybrid & it plays exactly the same as the tc97, just shows what a tiny difference in reality 97 to 101 is.
Maybe a beginner would notice more. thought they may have stiffened it up in the head a bit to keep the same stability as the 97, but no doesnt appear so. Didnt notice any extra power or loss in control either. had to double check i picked up the 101 from my bag as i have a few octanes.
 

Carreau

Semi-Pro
Interesting.
TC95 and TC100 are different IMO. Stability, launch angle, power and spin potential are noticeably different.
 

Jocko

Rookie
been hitting with a tc101 recently, picked one up part curiosity & part couldnt think of anything else i wanted to spend my money on. Cold here in UK so season doesnt really kick in until April & not a fan of squeeky feet indoor tennis & the ridicoulous cost.
its been a while since i played larger than a 97/8 head outside of a quick hit with local coach's demo racquets.
Anyway strung with ghost wire / black knight hybrid & it plays exactly the same as the tc97, just shows what a tiny difference in reality 97 to 101 is.
Maybe a beginner would notice more. thought they may have stiffened it up in the head a bit to keep the same stability as the 97, but no doesnt appear so. Didnt notice any extra power or loss in control either. had to double check i picked up the 101 from my bag as i have a few octanes.
Thank you for that comment! I’ve been playing with a ProStaff 97 and for a while now, an Angell K7 Red (98) Standard Length…but lately, as I get older and into my 70s, playing more & more doubles, I’m increasingly tempted to move to a larger head size…maybe even an extended 1/4 inch or so…thinking it might make things a bit easier. Though I certainly have no complaints re the K7 Red…it’s a terrific racquet…with outstanding feel. In spite of the “if it ain’t broke adage…”, the siren song still echoes…
 

Rock-solid

Rookie
Unfortunately only bought one ASL 2 when they were on sale, now they are gone. Any suggestion on another racket that is close to it, does not have to be Angel. I have played with a tc95, tc100 and tc97, none of them give me the power and control combo that the ASl 2 does.
 

TimePlease

Semi-Pro
Thank you for that comment! I’ve been playing with a ProStaff 97 and for a while now, an Angell K7 Red (98) Standard Length…but lately, as I get older and into my 70s, playing more & more doubles, I’m increasingly tempted to move to a larger head size…maybe even an extended 1/4 inch or so…thinking it might make things a bit easier. Though I certainly have no complaints re the K7 Red…it’s a terrific racquet…with outstanding feel. In spite of the “if it ain’t broke adage…”, the siren song still echoes…
I tried an extended 1/4 inch for the first time recently (TC95 16x19) but I couldn't manage the higher swingweight (8pts higher than standard length). It's especially hard to cope with the Angell Customs as the foam filling already makes them move slower and you'd need a very strong wrist and arm to get your timing right.
 

esm

Legend
I tried an extended 1/4 inch for the first time recently (TC95 16x19) but I couldn't manage the higher swingweight (8pts higher than standard length). It's especially hard to cope with the Angell Customs as the foam filling already makes them move slower and you'd need a very strong wrist and arm to get your timing right.
Can I ask what are other specs with the 1/4 extended length?
 
Can I ask what are other specs with the 1/4 extended length?
Can I ask what are other specs with the 1/4 extended length?

Regarding the specs for a 27.25 length TC95. I ordered a pair of these a few weeks ago and took delivery about 10 days ago. Specs I ordered all unstrung were as follows:
TC95 16x19, 63RA, Length 27.25, Weight 320gms, Balance 12 points HL. Swingweight requested in notes to Paul 300 as close as possible.
The frames were strung with Isospeed Professional Classic 1.20 and the strung specs were as follows ( as measured by my stringer ).
Frame 1. Frame 2
Weight. 332.8. 332.8
RA. 61. 61
Balance. 316. 318
Swingweight. 334. 338

Regarding the swingweights, bear in mind that Isospeed multi is probably lighter than most 16g poly strings so swingweight with poly may be a few points higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: esm

TimePlease

Semi-Pro
Can I ask what are other specs with the 1/4 extended length?
Mine was similar to Paul's although I only got the 305g/7HL version. When strung with full poly it came out around 328g, 335SW, 5HL (including overgrip and dampener) and then I added a few more grams in the trapdoor to make it more headlight.

I've since sent it back to Paul Angell to have it cut back to normal 27" length and the swingweight is now a more manageable 327. It's a good frame but it's new and I haven't played enough with it yet to get the best out of it.
 

GermanBeast

New User
Hi,
I am interested in a TC95 16x19. But I have some questions about it.

At the moment I am playing with a 360+ Prestige Pro and a weighted up 360+ radical mp.
Gamestyle: allrounder
4.5, OHB, semi western FH.
In summer I play on clay and in winter on indoor carpet.

I am looking for something like the 360+ prestige pro in feel, control and maneuverability with the easy playability of the 360+ radical mp.

Could be the TC 95 16x19 with the spin friendly and powerful open string pattern fit the gap?
If I would order one, I would choose the specs from the 360+ prestige pro (315gr / 315mm).
Has the TC 95 a similar SW then if I choose those specs?

Which grip shape A,B or C is equal to Head TK82s (newer Head rackets)?
 

Hop

New User
Hi,
I am interested in a TC95 16x19. But I have some questions about it.

At the moment I am playing with a 360+ Prestige Pro and a weighted up 360+ radical mp.
Gamestyle: allrounder
4.5, OHB, semi western FH.
In summer I play on clay and in winter on indoor carpet.

I am looking for something like the 360+ prestige pro in feel, control and maneuverability with the easy playability of the 360+ radical mp.

Could be the TC 95 16x19 with the spin friendly and powerful open string pattern fit the gap?
If I would order one, I would choose the specs from the 360+ prestige pro (315gr / 315mm).
Has the TC 95 a similar SW then if I choose those specs?

Which grip shape A,B or C is equal to Head TK82s (newer Head rackets)?
I played with Youtek IG Prestige Pro for about 2 years. I have TC95 16/19, 18/20 and TC97 16/19.

I find the launch angle of TC95 16/19 extremely high and the launch angle of 18/20 too low. I guess the Prestige Pro is between them.

For some reason TC97 is better for my game.
 

ed70

Professional
Interesting.
TC95 and TC100 are different IMO. Stability, launch angle, power and spin potential are noticeably different.

yes i found the same between the tc95 & tc100, i put this down to the thicker beam of the TC100 which i found harder to keep up racquet head speed.

with the tc97 & 101 the beams are same thickness, so i wonder why the TC100 beam was made wider?
 

ed70

Professional
I played with Youtek IG Prestige Pro for about 2 years. I have TC95 16/19, 18/20 and TC97 16/19.

I find the launch angle of TC95 16/19 extremely high and the launch angle of 18/20 too low. I guess the Prestige Pro is between them.

For some reason TC97 is better for my game.

I'd come from a Head Youtek Prestige midplus 18x20 before i changed over 4 years ago to Angell tc97 16x19. Demoed a stack of player frames before commiting, i had similar thoughts.
 

ed70

Professional
Thank you for that comment! I’ve been playing with a ProStaff 97 and for a while now, an Angell K7 Red (98) Standard Length…but lately, as I get older and into my 70s, playing more & more doubles, I’m increasingly tempted to move to a larger head size…maybe even an extended 1/4 inch or so…thinking it might make things a bit easier. Though I certainly have no complaints re the K7 Red…it’s a terrific racquet…with outstanding feel. In spite of the “if it ain’t broke adage…”, the siren song still echoes…

Firstly congrats on playing into your 70's, you have obviously looked after yourself or have great genes! I'm 51 & as i have some right inner knee arthritus i've also transitioned into more doubles, infact i dont play singles matches at all now.
I presume you add weight to the K7? The good thing about the 97&101 with doubles play are the lower launch angle of both, kind of inbetween an 18x20 & 16x19. Also really good stability, no extra weight in head is needed.
Not sure about extended length frames of a quarter inch, but it always surprised me how much increase in SW with extended length, i've his with a few 27.5's out of curiosity & they just felt odd.
 

ed70

Professional
Hi,
I am interested in a TC95 16x19. But I have some questions about it.

At the moment I am playing with a 360+ Prestige Pro and a weighted up 360+ radical mp.
Gamestyle: allrounder
4.5, OHB, semi western FH.
In summer I play on clay and in winter on indoor carpet.

I am looking for something like the 360+ prestige pro in feel, control and maneuverability with the easy playability of the 360+ radical mp.

Could be the TC 95 16x19 with the spin friendly and powerful open string pattern fit the gap?
If I would order one, I would choose the specs from the 360+ prestige pro (315gr / 315mm).
Has the TC 95 a similar SW then if I choose those specs?

Which grip shape A,B or C is equal to Head TK82s (newer Head rackets)?

Hi, what made you look at the TC95 16x19 over the TC97 16x19? The 97 probably sits nicely between your current frames.
 

GermanBeast

New User
Hi, what made you look at the TC95 16x19 over the TC97 16x19? The 97 probably sits nicely between your current frames.

Hi,
I like small headsizes for my OHB. The one thing that I didn‘t like about the PP is that it is quite demanding for long matches and the relative low launch angle.
About the TC95 16x19 I read that it has a bigger 95 than other 95s and it has more power and a higher launch angle.
So, that is why I thought it could be a 360+ PP just a bit more user friendly like maybe near a radical mp.
For the TC97 I read that it has a lower launch angle and it is less maneuverable than the TC95.
 

ChrisG

Professional
I'll repeat what I've written a lot of times here, TC95 16x19 is a must try if you want a good blend of players frame with modern power and trajectory.
I've never felt the "extreme launch angle" that some commented. Most of my opponent say that I hit quite flat (by today's standard I presume) even though I'm using relatively thin strings (Silver 7 tour 1.25 & Ghostwire 1.22) at some medium/high tension.
What's mandatory, however, is to really apply full stroke to control and tame the frame. Don't forget it's a player's frame that need some clean technique though
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
I'll repeat what I've written a lot of times here, TC95 16x19 is a must try if you want a good blend of players frame with modern power and trajectory.
I've never felt the "extreme launch angle" that some commented. Most of my opponent say that I hit quite flat (by today's standard I presume) even though I'm using relatively thin strings (Silver 7 tour 1.25 & Ghostwire 1.22) at some medium/high tension.
What's mandatory, however, is to really apply full stroke to control and tame the frame. Don't forget it's a player's frame that need some clean technique though

I think the launch angle will also depend on the tension you play with. If you are in the mid-high 40s it will be different to if you are in the mid-high 50s.
 
Please tell me what one may expect using an Angell racquet not experienced with any other brand. Currently use Yonex Ezone 105s with weight added to handle and hoop. Would think about the custom 105, 310 grams at 7points HL. Thanks.
 

ed70

Professional
Hi,
I like small headsizes for my OHB. The one thing that I didn‘t like about the PP is that it is quite demanding for long matches and the relative low launch angle.
About the TC95 16x19 I read that it has a bigger 95 than other 95s and it has more power and a higher launch angle.
So, that is why I thought it could be a 360+ PP just a bit more user friendly like maybe near a radical mp.
For the TC97 I read that it has a lower launch angle and it is less maneuverable than the TC95.

The TC97 shares same grommets as the TC95, to be honest you would be pushed to see any difference in head size. Not sure where you heard that the TC97 was less maneuverable, strange one that & is definately untrue, it does have better stability though. The tc95 has a noticeably higher launch angle though although if your hit one handed backhand topspin you won't have any problems with net clearence with the TC97. Heavy Slice with either frame too.
Prestige feel is similar to the TC97, not so sure about the recent prestiges though, thought the 2021 prestige tour 99sqinch was a nice hitting frame with the 18x19 string pattern..
 

Mirdad

Semi-Pro
The TC97 shares same grommets as the TC95, to be honest you would be pushed to see any difference in head size. Not sure where you heard that the TC97 was less maneuverable, strange one that & is definately untrue, it does have better stability though. The tc95 has a noticeably higher launch angle though although if your hit one handed backhand topspin you won't have any problems with net clearence with the TC97. Heavy Slice with either frame too.
Prestige feel is similar to the TC97, not so sure about the recent prestiges though, thought the 2021 prestige tour 99sqinch was a nice hitting frame with the 18x19 string pattern..
Ed, just hit with my brand new TC97 16x19 V4. My ordered specs were 320g/300SW/305 h/l. With 1.26mm Yetek Quadro Twist+dampener+over grip = 343 static weight/312 h/l (or about 9 points h/l). I like to play an aggressive style game mixing up looping topspin shots with flatter shots and attack the net when there is an opening. My favorite racquet is the RFA but at my age I wanted reduce the weight as well as the stiffness. I also hit with the TC100 63ra and really love that racquet too as it fits my game but I find the launch angle is a bit too high at times as well as it's not as accurate as I'd like. I was a bit apprehensive in buying the TC97 when I heard it had a much lower launch angle than most other 16x19 patterns. Fortunately, I had zero problems with the launch angle. In fact, I discovered I can more easily choose the trajectory I wanted to clear the net. I can do this with my RFA but lately I struggle to do so due to its heavier weight and am pleased to say I find the TC97 at my final specs to be much whippier.

I can verify your description of the TC97 being plush like the Prestige of old as well as possess a predictable launch angle is spot on. Feel wise, I found the TC97 to be much like a smaller version of the TC100 63ra but with less power, improved launch predictability and more accuracy. I'm struggling a little bit with my THBH on the TC97 mainly because I'm used to hitting with a heavier racquet. Therefore, I've tried putting 1 gram of lead tape at 11 and 1 but I still need to do some tinkering around to get it right. I think I'll try adding a gram at 3 and 9 and see how that works.

I was wondering if you knew how much SW 1.26 mm strings would add to the SW of 300 grams unstrung? I've heard most people saying strings add about 30 more to the SW. I think 330 is just right but I'll have to factor in the additional lead tape I might add to the hoop as well. I don't want to increase the SW more than 332. I might remove the dampener which weighs 3 grams as this racquet is so plush I don't think it needs it. Also, I don't really find the top of the hoop as "dead" just more forgiving. I find the entire string bed to just as comfortable as my TC100 63 ra which is a very welcome surprise. My TC97 is about 5 grams lighter in static weight than my TC100 so I can add some more lead tape to increase the power as well as help my THBH.

Also, I appreciate any recommendations regarding your best string set up too. I string my own racquets so I'm always up for trying a new set up.
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
Also, I appreciate any recommendations regarding your best string set up too. I string my own racquets so I'm always up for trying a new set up.

I have used MSV Co-Focus 1.18mm in my 18x20, and it was great... so a thicker gauge version would also do well. I have used hybrid set-ups with Babolat Origin in the Mains and a round poly in the crosses. RS Lyon would be great, as would MSV Focus Hex +38; Tier 1 Black Knight, Tour Status, Ghostwire; Grapplesnake Tour Sniper, Alpha, Tour M8 (fantastic string), and many other Grapplesnake strings. I will be using Head Syn Gut PPS as part of the hybrid set-ups, as well as Gosen OG Sheep Micro, Gosen AK Control 17, and AK Pro CX 1.24mm. You could look into Kirschbaum Pro Line Evolution and Pro-Line X; Weiss Cannon Red Ghost, Silverstring, and Scorpion; Ashaway MonoGut ZX.

Hopefully, that is enough.
 

Mirdad

Semi-Pro
I have used MSV Co-Focus 1.18mm in my 18x20, and it was great... so a thicker gauge version would also do well. I have used hybrid set-ups with Babolat Origin in the Mains and a round poly in the crosses. RS Lyon would be great, as would MSV Focus Hex +38; Tier 1 Black Knight, Tour Status, Ghostwire; Grapplesnake Tour Sniper, Alpha, Tour M8 (fantastic string), and many other Grapplesnake strings. I will be using Head Syn Gut PPS as part of the hybrid set-ups, as well as Gosen OG Sheep Micro, Gosen AK Control 17, and AK Pro CX 1.24mm. You could look into Kirschbaum Pro Line Evolution and Pro-Line X; Weiss Cannon Red Ghost, Silverstring, and Scorpion; Ashaway MonoGut ZX.

Hopefully, that is enough.
Out of all of the strings you've recommended, I have tried Grapplesnake Tour Sniper and liked it very much. I found it comfortable, not too much power and was very durable. In fact I might still have some of a reel left over. Since I'm now using a slightly lower powered racquet I might want string with a little more power than Tour Sniper. However, I probably need to first finish customizing my new TC97 with lead tape and then experiment with strings as the added weight will undoubtedly increase the power as well.

Thank you very much for your recommendations........I'll check them out!
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
Out of all of the strings you've recommended, I have tried Grapplesnake Tour Sniper and liked it very much. I found it comfortable, not too much power and was very durable. In fact I might still have some of a reel left over. Since I'm now using a slightly lower powered racquet I might want string with a little more power than Tour Sniper. However, I probably need to first finish customizing my new TC97 with lead tape and then experiment with strings as the added weight will undoubtedly increase the power as well.

Thank you very much for your recommendations........I'll check them out!

No problem. Grapplesnake Alpha is basically Tour Sniper, but a little softer (more ball pocketing), and possibly a bit more power (although it could just be the cupping feeling - although lighter strings seem to be more lively). Hybrid set-ups would help up the power as well.
 

ed70

Professional
Ed, just hit with my brand new TC97 16x19 V4. My ordered specs were 320g/300SW/305 h/l. With 1.26mm Yetek Quadro Twist+dampener+over grip = 343 static weight/312 h/l (or about 9 points h/l). I like to play an aggressive style game mixing up looping topspin shots with flatter shots and attack the net when there is an opening. My favorite racquet is the RFA but at my age I wanted reduce the weight as well as the stiffness. I also hit with the TC100 63ra and really love that racquet too as it fits my game but I find the launch angle is a bit too high at times as well as it's not as accurate as I'd like. I was a bit apprehensive in buying the TC97 when I heard it had a much lower launch angle than most other 16x19 patterns. Fortunately, I had zero problems with the launch angle. In fact, I discovered I can more easily choose the trajectory I wanted to clear the net. I can do this with my RFA but lately I struggle to do so due to its heavier weight and am pleased to say I find the TC97 at my final specs to be much whippier.

I can verify your description of the TC97 being plush like the Prestige of old as well as possess a predictable launch angle is spot on. Feel wise, I found the TC97 to be much like a smaller version of the TC100 63ra but with less power, improved launch predictability and more accuracy. I'm struggling a little bit with my THBH on the TC97 mainly because I'm used to hitting with a heavier racquet. Therefore, I've tried putting 1 gram of lead tape at 11 and 1 but I still need to do some tinkering around to get it right. I think I'll try adding a gram at 3 and 9 and see how that works.

I was wondering if you knew how much SW 1.26 mm strings would add to the SW of 300 grams unstrung? I've heard most people saying strings add about 30 more to the SW. I think 330 is just right but I'll have to factor in the additional lead tape I might add to the hoop as well. I don't want to increase the SW more than 332. I might remove the dampener which weighs 3 grams as this racquet is so plush I don't think it needs it. Also, I don't really find the top of the hoop as "dead" just more forgiving. I find the entire string bed to just as comfortable as my TC100 63 ra which is a very welcome surprise. My TC97 is about 5 grams lighter in static weight than my TC100 so I can add some more lead tape to increase the power as well as help my THBH.

Also, I appreciate any recommendations regarding your best string set up too. I string my own racquets so I'm always up for trying a new set up.

good to hear your enjoying the frame, I’ve always felt it’s ok to keep SW on the TC97 a bit lower than usual as it’s still stable & you can use the extra RHS to generate the pace on ball. My frames are at 325SW. The TC100 swung slower & I actually turned away in disgust in a few doubles matches thinking I’d hit long only for my partner to yell it’s dropped in! Nice frame but after 4 years playing the 97 I very much doubt I’ll change to another match frame. At 51 with sensitive elbow & a knee problem, I’m working more on my health & fitness to keep playing competitively for as long as possible. I think classic - TXP has a better wealth of knowledge on strings, I know we both like Babolat origin in a hybrid with a round poly, unfortunately they stopped making origin, so I’m using my reel sparingly just for matches. TBH though I’ve put all sorts of 17g poly, synth gut, multi strings in over the years & they all play well, frames not string sensitive.
 

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
unfortunately they stopped making origin, so I’m using my reel sparingly just for matches. TBH though I’ve put all sorts of 17g poly, synth gut, multi strings in over the years & they all play well, frames not string sensitive.

Likewise. The racquet plays well with a variety of strings and it comes more down to personal feel preferences.
 

jangotango

Semi-Pro
Trying to replace my Six One Team (only leather grip added) with something. I had ordered and tried a TC95 70RA 18x20 built to the same specs, but I didn't like it at all. I see that the V3 TC100 and 101 are on sale, y'all think one of them would be a worthy replacement?
 
Top