Top 4 one year ago

[Andy G]

The current top 4 are:

Federer 11,035
Djokovich 8220
Murray 6835
Nadal 6800

The top 4 one year ago was:

Nadal 14990... -8190
Federer 10910 ... +125
Djokovich 8420 ... -200
Murray 7850... -1015



Amazingly, Federer is the only to not have lost points. Considering how everyone thought he was finished, not only is he the only one to gain points, but the only one of the top 4 to win a slam...3 slams with a runner up. And that unstoppable Nadal has managed to lose 8190 points in one year. Wow all the *********s who were talking about how the Spanish Bull was taking over while I was saying he was a one year wonder must be crying themselves to sleep.

But this also shows how consistent Djokovich is. Considering how many tourneys he plays and can consistently stay in the low to mid 8000's is pretty impressive. I don't understand why people want to not give his due credit. I think he's an excellent player and will be #1 for a long time (at least 100 weeks) after Fed retires. Considering he's only 22, I don't think any of the current top 10 will overtake him for #1 when that time comes.

 

[djokovicgonzalez2010]

You can't spell.... but yeah, because 4-8 are a lot stronger

 

[Andy G]

You can't spell.... but yeah, because 4-8 are a lot stronger

Oh, I added an 'h' to his name. Yeah, that means I don't know how to spell. Very intelligent. Gee, is anything I write correct? Hmmm, how about the other couple hundred words? You're a ******. Besides, I'm complimenting your player. Idiot.

 

[djokovicgonzalez2010]

Geez. I agree with you! And agree with you politically! Just correcting that one pretty bad error

 

[*Val*]

There's only a h in Djokovic if you call him Djoko*****.

 

[PimpMyGame]

Quite a nice thread, spoiled by pedantry and aggression. Unlucky!

 

[Andy G]

Geez. I agree with you! And agree with you politically! Just correcting that one pretty bad error

'Pretty bad error'? I didn't realize how bad that must be. You know, like ending sentences without a period. I guess neither of us knows how to write. I can't stand people who have to point something out 'just to be right' when the do dumb **** that's no better. But, god forbid the don't get to be right about something.

 

[djokovicgonzalez2010]

You are overreacting pretty badly....

 

[rovex]

Oh, I added an 'h' to his name. Yeah, that means I don't know how to spell. Very intelligent. Gee, is anything I write correct? Hmmm, how about the other couple hundred words? You're a ******. Besides, I'm complimenting your player. Idiot.

Was this necessary? This thread sucks anyway. Downgrading Nadal and boasting about Federer.

 

[joeri888]

This thread doesn't suck. It's interesting. The field has caught up with the top, or the top has dropped down. Amazing how Federer has just as many points now (holding 3 Slams+ 2 MS titles) as 1 year ago (holding 1 Slam, no MS titles)

 

[Andy G]

You are overreacting pretty badly....

You know what it is. Today is my only day off and I deal with people like you 6 days a week. People who just have to be right about any one little thing, something, anything. Was it really necessary to tell me I don't know how to spell. Or maybe just a "hey, there's no h in his name". Like the guy at my work who knew how many calories there were in a hotdog and I didn't. He wanted me to "Tell him he was right" while he did some fancy endzone dance.

So much for my day off. Time to go somewhere else.

 

[Djokovicfan4life]

The overreaction in this thread is great. Someone said you can't spell-- which MAYBE was a but rude. That's it. Nothing to get suicidal over.

 

[FlamEnemY]

This thread doesn't suck. It's interesting. The field has caught up with the top, or the top has dropped down. Amazing how Federer has just as many points now (holding 3 Slams+ 2 MS titles) as 1 year ago (holding 1 Slam, no MS titles)

Does this show that it's irrelevant what field Federer plays against? And as such, a final proof of the nonsense of "weak era" theories?

 

[PimpMyGame]

Does this show that it's irrelevant what field Federer plays against?

I think it may indicate as such, it's very easy to forget what a special player Federer is.

And as such, a final proof of the nonsense of "weak era" theories?

Not necessarily proof, but anyone prepared to slam Federer for playing in a weak era basically needs their head checking

 

[shazbot]