Why do more pros use poly/gut than gut/poly?
Some say that gut crosses temper the harshness of the poly.
Some say that this hybrid feels the best.
What about snapback?
Natural gut is a very sticky string.
For example, Wilson Natural gut 16 has one of the highest (sticky) COF (string to string friction).
It has a very high COF of 0.245. The lowest COF is only 0.059 (poly).
http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/reporter2.php
A sticky cross string prevents/constrain the poly mains from snapping back.
So why would a pro use Natural gut as a cross?
Don't they care about the additional spin generated by snapback or are they are mostly flat hitters and don't care about spin?
Maybe they generate all the spin they need from their technique and they don't need additional spin from snapback.
Maybe snapback is overhyped and these pros are not buying into it.
Comments?
Some say that gut crosses temper the harshness of the poly.
Some say that this hybrid feels the best.
What about snapback?
Natural gut is a very sticky string.
For example, Wilson Natural gut 16 has one of the highest (sticky) COF (string to string friction).
It has a very high COF of 0.245. The lowest COF is only 0.059 (poly).
http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/reporter2.php
A sticky cross string prevents/constrain the poly mains from snapping back.
So why would a pro use Natural gut as a cross?
Don't they care about the additional spin generated by snapback or are they are mostly flat hitters and don't care about spin?
Maybe they generate all the spin they need from their technique and they don't need additional spin from snapback.
Maybe snapback is overhyped and these pros are not buying into it.
Comments?
Last edited: