Wuornos
Professional
Can someone please help me. I very rarely see Mats Wilander discussed as one of the greats and yet statistically he seems to warrant at least discussion.
E.g.
Mats Wilander was 10-3 in major semi finals and 7-4 in finals. He won 7 majors spread over a period of 1982 - 1988 (7 years inclusive).
Jimmy Connors was 15-16 in major Semis Finals and 8-7 in finals. He won 8 majors spread over 1974-1982 (9 years inclusive).
Andre Agassi was 15-11 in major semi finals and 8-7 in finals. He won 8 majors spread over 1992 to 2003 (12 years inclusive)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Mats was better, I'm just wondering why he doesn't seem to be considered more often as a great.
Any help or advice that can shed light on this appreciated.
Tim
E.g.
Mats Wilander was 10-3 in major semi finals and 7-4 in finals. He won 7 majors spread over a period of 1982 - 1988 (7 years inclusive).
Jimmy Connors was 15-16 in major Semis Finals and 8-7 in finals. He won 8 majors spread over 1974-1982 (9 years inclusive).
Andre Agassi was 15-11 in major semi finals and 8-7 in finals. He won 8 majors spread over 1992 to 2003 (12 years inclusive)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Mats was better, I'm just wondering why he doesn't seem to be considered more often as a great.
Any help or advice that can shed light on this appreciated.
Tim