Well then, why would you care at all what annoying teens think? Just challenge them to a match. That should shut them up. And if it doesn't, just stop giving a ****.
I don't care what they think, I think you missunderstood, I said these kids are UTR8+ so I don't care if I lose since its expected, so I play freely, no worries, no pressure, just play and swing out, different than against someone much weaker where I feel pressure and the desire to beat them and not lose.
.
I didn’t say anything about strokes. I am talking about consistency as a base. I pointed to Brian Su to show that you can get to a 5.0 level by playing a style that gives you a lot of margin for error. Even pros give themselves good margin for error but they have more pace and have to react quicker.
If you want to emulate how pros play and try to hit a bit more flatter with a lot of pace, that’s fine. However realize that they already have the ability to play the easier consistent game that Brian has. Do you?
I have no clue who Brian is, do you have any youtube links?
I know consistency is very important, and building points is important, im working towards that, I used to try to hit winners off every ball but now im learning slowly that its not about that at all.
But there are different types of styles of players, and you build ur strokes and game depending on ur strenghts and the type of player you strive to be right?
My role model is Federer and I just happen to have a very good serve and forehand, and I also like to play all over the court so I strive to play a more aggressive based all court game, and that doesn't mean ball bashing, but controled aggression, smart aggression, defense when needed, but when the oportunity is there no hesitation to attack or even risk a bit at times.
Let's be honest. Despite your protests to the contrary, you really believe that because you have a certain natural fluidity it should automatically translate into becoming a higher level player quicker. There are no shortcuts my friend. A lot of your posts mock how most on this forum underrate better players. You are no different though you don't realize it. Else you'd not be dismissive of 5.0s who don't play a super aggressive style. You'd respect that fact that they have got to a point which you might never ever get to despite all your natural fluidity. Also a lot of your posts seem to take pride in how you either beat or gave a tough time to someone who has played 10-12 years, because it gives you the feeling that you have something special going for you. I personally know a couple of guys in their early 40s who have started in the last couple of years and will beat you right now based on what I've seen of your videos. They will lose to you down the road only because age will be a factor. Not because your strokes are better or have more upside.
Once you realize how insignificant what you are trying to do is and how there are tons of players just like you out there, you'll begin to enjoy the process more. As I keep saying, don't end up like TTPS.
No I don't think that at all, your way wrong.
I don't think it should translate into me becoming a higher level player quicker, infact if anything it should take longer, because im working on building higher level strokes such as a quality kick serve, if I wanted to simply be a better player quicker I would simply push the 2nd serve in and I would be much better match level wise, but the goal is higher and that takes better strokes and longer development even if in the short term its not the best for results wise.
But I do believe my ceiling is much better having higher level technique and strokes than if I didn't, someone who has alot of mechanical and technical issues and/or doesn't have naturaly as much talent or fluidity of strokes has a lower ceiling, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL.
Someone who has a very good technique and form on the serve and can serve lets say 120mph (not talking miself), and has good technique on both forehand and backhand, good volleys, proper and good footwork etc etc... will have a much higher ceiling than someone with a pancake serve, with bunty fh and bunty backhand etc... no matter what you say, those are just facts.
Yes there are a ton of players, some very high level players who have big flaws in their shots and no weapons or this or that, but they are not the majority and thats the fact, they are such higher level DESPITE those things, because they might have superior athleticism, or superior shot selection or whatever, but all things equal, better serve = better level, better forehand = better level etc... surely you realize that?
So I think your view of "this stroke is good enough for that level so no need to improve it" is flawed, you should strive to improve your strokes no matter how good they become, even federer keeps improving his strokes and making changes and improvements.
BUT, I also think its important to realize that just like better strokes will make you better or give u higher potential, so will many other things such as athleticism, endurance, footwork, tactics, shot selection etc.... so equally important than building and working on and improving ur strokes, is also working on all those other things, its a flaw to ignore them and focus just on strokes.
And I do respect those 5.0 like iRacer who just keep the ball in play and play a defensive style... I respect 4.5 players equally, 4.0 players also.. I don't disrespect players, everyone deserves respect that put their time and effort into something they love, their passion, which is tennis.
I find your view odd about being prideful about beating someone who plays for a long time, of course I feel prideful, ive put alot of effort into tennis and I love it and getting such good results or unexpected successes is a very good reward and of course I feel proud.