time_fly
Hall of Fame
The WSJ posted an article about the state of American tennis. I'm not sure if non-subscribers can read it, but here is a link:
Coco Gauff Is the Future of American Tennis. But It Still Looks Bleak on the Men’s Side.
The thrust of the article is that tennis is a popular option for young, athletic women but young, athletic boys have too many other, more popular organized sports to play. The article then pivots to blaming the USTA for not organizing a compelling alternative to other organized boys' sports. The article is not open for discussion on the WSJ site, so why not discuss it here?
I can say that in our area, I see two types of male juniors: children of serious adult tennis players who were raised to play tennis, and boys that washed out of more popular sports like baseball and basketball.
Coco Gauff Is the Future of American Tennis. But It Still Looks Bleak on the Men’s Side.
The thrust of the article is that tennis is a popular option for young, athletic women but young, athletic boys have too many other, more popular organized sports to play. The article then pivots to blaming the USTA for not organizing a compelling alternative to other organized boys' sports. The article is not open for discussion on the WSJ site, so why not discuss it here?
I can say that in our area, I see two types of male juniors: children of serious adult tennis players who were raised to play tennis, and boys that washed out of more popular sports like baseball and basketball.