Yesdoes the k7 has a trap door ?
and is there a free access to the handle chambers, so that you can put blutack in them ?
In my opinion it is more buttery feeling and a slightly more muted feel (which I feel are one in the same) than other Angell racquets I have hit with. I would not say that it produces any more spin than the other Angell 97 racquets. I felt less power than the Custom Angell racquets but not a huge marginal difference. I feel that spin is more a function of the players strokes than the racquet composition. There was no difference to me in the control/directionality department.
Hello @Zoolander I felt that the K7 was a mix of both the Head and Wilson frames. I feel that the Angell custom frames are almost identical in feel to the Wilson H racquets and the Kevlar in the K7 gives a different response that is more Head like. I know we would like everything in a racquet and this frame offers a different feel for those looking for a softer feel without maintaining some of the classic Angell custom feel.Hi Geoff nice writeup! any idea of the strung RA? Is the feel like the dull thud of Heads twaron racquets or the crisper braided kevlar of Wilsons? Thanks!
How would you compare the launch angle of tc 97 16x19 to k7?Hello @Zoolander I felt that the K7 was a mix of both the Head and Wilson frames. I feel that the Angell custom frames are almost identical in feel to the Wilson H racquets and the Kevlar in the K7 gives a different response that is more Head like. I know we would like everything in a racquet and this frame offers a different feel for those looking for a softer feel without maintaining some of the classic Angell custom feel.
Hello @galapagos I feel that the TC97 has a stiffer/crisper feel in the hoop than the K7. To me it comes down to personal preference of feel at impact. I am more of a feel at impact person than launch angle. I hope what I replied makes sense or is helpful.How would you compare the launch angle of tc 97 16x19 to k7?
Oh that red on red is hideousI've fixed it for ya
Haha that had me laughing out so loud, my wife gave me the stink eye. Too funny!
YepI take it that this comes with a molded grip and not pallets?
I just received word from Paul that the upcoming stock will have rectified the grip size issue.
So it will be wise to order your preferred grip size.
YesMeans it will be smaller?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ugh, my size is fine now, I don’t want it smaller. I will end up with different grip sizesI just received word from Paul that the upcoming stock will have rectified the grip size issue.
So it will be wise to order your preferred grip size.
To me, it feels like it has a lower launch angle than my old tc97 16x19. I played it with gut at 50lbs (when I bought I knew my 11yo would probably inherit it so I strung it lower). The control I had and the low launch angle even with gut at low tension makes this a very predictable frame to hit with and for me control was surprisingly good. Not as high as my TC97 18m, but much higher than a 16x19 with low tension should be. I’d be curious to try full bed poly with it.
Directional control is also very high. But this is not really a problem for me no matter what frame I play with as I would adjust rapidly to compensate. Hopefully someone more sensitive to this could chime in.
To sum it up, the K7 feels natural. It sends the ball where you point it at a launch angle that is very true. But I guess that depends where your coming from.
Imagine the glory of green instead of that black, ho, ho, ho.
More like the red/green nightmare
*Disclaimer: I am really not the best to comment on this, the way a frame flexes never bothered me. Some people are a lot more senstitive to that than I will ever be.Can you comment on upper loop flex of K7 vs TC97 16x19?
Ultra Tour for example had much more stable/stiff upper loop compared to TC97, which I liked so much more for control on voleys/slice and even a bit on regular strokes.
*Disclaimer: I am really not the best to comment on this, the way a frame flexes never bothered me. Some people are a lot more senstitive to that than I will ever be.
That said, the K7 feels like it has very even flex along the frame. It doesn't have the high stability of the Ultra Tour at the net, so the TW is probably lower. However, the string bed feels a lot more even than the UT. There is a hot spot in the UT that when you hit it, the ball goes boom! But outside you don't get the extra oomph.
Comparing with the TC97 16m is hard for me as I switched to the TC97 18m over a year ago and sold my 16m. But the launch angle is defintely lower and that's part of the reason why I sold my TC97s 16m. I didn't get the precision I wanted. With the K7 I can place the ball really well, launch angle is not high for a 16x19 and the even string bed allows to hit precisely.
That's as best as I can compare these frames. Hopefully, I might be playing against the guy I sold my Tc97s 16m to in the next couple days. If it happens, I will hit back to back and see if I can come up with more useful info for you.
Geoff, How would you compare the K7 to the C10 Pro with regards to flex, comfort and power?Hello @galapagos I feel that the TC97 has a stiffer/crisper feel in the hoop than the K7. To me it comes down to personal preference of feel at impact. I am more of a feel at impact person than launch angle. I hope what I replied makes sense or is helpful.
Hello @JediMindTrickGeoff, How would you compare the K7 to the C10 Pro with regards to flex, comfort and power?
Sorry, never hit the C10 either.Hello @JediMindTrick
I have never hit with the C10 Pro so I am not much help. Perhaps @topspn may know.
I agree, I have hit with both TC97 16x19 (its my current stick) and the new K7, and I also felt the launch angle of K7 was higher.I’ve been using the tc97 16x19 for over 18 months, it’s funny when reviewing frames how some people’s reviews don’t tally up with my findings. I think the K7’s launch angle is higher than my 16x19 TC97!
K7 has a little less power too in it’s standard form, on plus side it plays softer and with more control.
I will be curious on your impression since you loved the TC100My WC Scorpion arrived today so it will be ready for when my K7 arrives,
I'm excited. My son is a Freshman in HS and is using the PS100. He hit with my TC100 the other night and he licked his chops. He was like dad, this is sick for volleys. I have a feeling the K7 will be perfect for him. But I'm sure I will dig it. The TC100 is the first stick I've used that's a 100. Usually use 98 or less.I will be curious on your impression since you loved the TC100
I'm still waiting for someone to use duct tape instead of lead.
So what are your strung specs on TC100? Do you know your SW by any chance? Just curiousI'm excited. My son is a Freshman in HS and is using the PS100. He hit with my TC100 the other night and he licked his chops. He was like dad, this is sick for volleys. I have a feeling the K7 will be perfect for him. But I'm sure I will dig it. The TC100 is the first stick I've used that's a 100. Usually use 98 or less.
I bought the 300/330 version of the TC100. I added a little weight in the butt cap and some lead tape and 3/9 and the racquet comes out at 11.49 oz. Its quite a bit lighter than the PS97's I used prior, but I'm digging the lightness of the frame. I haven't measured the SW, it seems like too much work and calculation, lol.So what are your strung specs on TC100? Do you know your SW by any chance? Just curious
can you share your experience, thanksOK, I've ordered one of these. A little concerned at the relatively light weight -- I use a DR98 -- but will give it a go.
can you share your experience, thanks
- String crosses higher than mainsThis is a nice frame, it's spooky comfy, ton of power, but with the really open string pattern I'm launching the ball way too high. It came with leather grip, with OG it's at 332g, 8pt HL, 3g @ 12, 6g @ 7". Strung with quad twist poly at 50.
Can anyone recommend any modifications that will help lower the launch angle. Should I try 15g string, mains lower than cross, put the weight at 9/3, more static weight? I'm coming from a RF97 with gut/poly, but using 330 Vcore pro now. Any help would be appreciated.
i never understood why the 16x19 angells all have this fu****g open stringpattern, for me thats really an issue and a reason not to buy the k7.Can anyone recommend any modifications that will help lower the launch angle.
i never understood why the 16x19 angells all have this fu****g open stringpattern, for me thats really an issue and a reason not to buy the k7.
I looked at the different posts and was not going to comment at all K7 is neither the most open pattern 16x19 or the tightest. For sure, it is on the open side. I found the launch angle extremely neutral and i have zero problem flattening out when that is what i want to do. I also have no problem on either side bringing the ball down and through the court. I am not an 18x20 guy and don’t need to be but I do like some 16x20 patterns. Anyway, thanks for thinking of me If some need a tighter pattern, by all means, you most certainly don’t need me to bless your decisionsIf @topspn was here he'd probably explain that the open pattern is to enable spn generation.
I looked at the different posts and was not going to comment at all K7 is neither the most open pattern 16x19 or the tightest. For sure, it is on the open side. I found the launch angle extremely neutral and i have zero problem flattening out when that is what i want to do. I also have no problem on either side bringing the ball down and through the court. I am not an 18x20 guy and don’t need to be but I do like some 16x20 patterns. Anyway, thanks for thinking of me If some need a tighter pattern, by all means, you most certainly don’t need me to bless your decisions
I cannot give you an exact answer since I didn’t have the TC95 at the same time to compare side by side. I’d say about the same as TC95 but tighter then TC100. Launch angle more tempered then bothOh, so it's a denser 16x19 than TC95?