If you're a players racquet diehard, you will probably not like the Clash. I used to play with players frames like prestiges and pure controls/storms because they were softer and offered feel for the ball. Those things were important to me. I usually played well, probably better, with Pure Drives and other similar frames, but I missed the comfort and feedback of my other frames. I could find an adequate balance of control, spin, and easy depth from a couple other frames, but I usually ended up with arm pain.
The Clash remedies some of the disadvantages of typical tweeners for me. I can make it through multiple hours of play in a day pain-free with full polyester strings. Most importantly, I feel like I know what the ball is going to do off of the strings once I hit and can adjust from there. With Pure Aeros, Ultras, Radicals, etc., I get a vague sense of accuracy and how the ball will come off of my strings. That makes me feel like I can't trust the racquet in pressure situations. This is significantly better for me with the Clash.
While the Clash doesn't have PT57A-like feel and control, it delivers much better feel for the ball than a typical chunky tweener frame. I finally feel like I can play with a frame that suits my game rather than one that I like the feel of and is comfortable enough for my arm.
TLDR: Pure Drive/APD style frames are best for my game but players sticks give me comfort and feel that I prioritize. The Clash partially remedies the negative aspects of traditional tweeners, and I like that.
