tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
I'm taking those odds. 99,9% looks pretty good. Who wants to bet against this?
Translated to mean you think Nadal will win.Your courage is noted.
Djokovic and RF are favourites. They are at 100%. No Rafa needed to get that 100%.
Rafa has zero chances of winning it if he has to face either RF or Novak, and he would have to.
The rest of the field?
Snicker.
I'm taking those odds. 99,9% looks pretty good. Who wants to bet against this?
He almost won a slam this year, and by almost I don't mean he blew some break points, I mean he blew match points (plural) on his own serve.Federer has no chance.
I hope you don't translate for a living, otherwise you can't have money enough for a bargain-bin DVD.Translated to mean you think Nadal will win.
What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.He almost won a slam this year, and by almost I don't mean he blew some break points, I mean he blew match points (plural) on his own serve.
He also almost had a second M1000. He also won two semi-prestigious 500s. Did well at FO.
If that isn't impressive form, what is?
No, RF fans, you have reason to hope. Novak is only a slight favourite over RF. It's one or the other.
Who won Montreal lol....Who in Australia thrashed the guy that beat Federer...who in Paris embarrassed Federer in straight sets.....Nadal. LMAO.I hope you don't translate for a living, otherwise you must be residing in a container.
I repeat, again in English, the official language of TTW: Rafa has zero chances of winning USO. To find an explanation scroll back.
1. DjokovicYou are really making a dangerous prediction here...but I would agree with you here.
I have it as Djokovic at one, a gap, then Federer and Nadal joint second.
Nadal often leads the race after the clay season (and sometimes even Wimby). Then comes USO and the indoor season... and Novak snatches it.What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.
Almost doesn't cut it. you win or don't win. Nadal and Djokovic win events...Federer doesn't. Hence I can guarantee Federer will not win USO, or frankly any major again.
Lol Nadal leads the race but Djokovic has won 2 of the 3 GS played. If Nadal wins the USO then yeah he is the best player of 2019 so far.What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.
Almost doesn't cut it. you win or don't win. Nadal and Djokovic win events...Federer doesn't. Hence I can guarantee Federer will not win USO, or frankly any major again.
1. Djokovic
2. Federer
3. Nadal
4. Thiem
5. Medvedev
Oh yeah beating the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Federer, a very telling achievement for sure!Who won Montreal lol....Who in Australia thrashed the guy that beat Federer...who in Paris embarrassed Federer in straight sets.....Nadal. LMAO.
Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.Nadal often leads the race after the clay season (and sometimes even Wimby). Then comes USO and the indoor season... and Novak snatches it.
From what we have seen since 2017. I cannot put Nadal ahead of Federer outside of clay. No matter the draw.Yeah, that seems about right. I would probably put Nadal over Federer, if Federer gets drawn into Djokovic's side though.
Federer just got schooled by Rublev, who is ranked lower than all those Nadal beat lol. Id give up if I was you lol. Not your finest hour is it.Oh yeah beating the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Federer, a very telling achievement for sure!
Rafa won Montreal by not playing semis, by facing a perplexed and fearful Medvedev (M1000 finale newbie) and by beating the likes of Evans. Yes a masterful win, legendary by all standards.
Much is made of Rafa's 2-1 over Novak. It took the BEST Rafa ever to make those two wins.Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.
Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.
From what we have seen since 2017. I cannot put Nadal ahead of Federer outside of clay. No matter the draw.
Djokovic is not as good as 2013..whats your point? We will never see peak v peak of any of them again, but they still good enough to be top 3.Much is made of Rafa's 2-1 over Novak. It took the BEST Rafa ever to make those two wins.
Is the current Rafa the best Rafa ever?
Hardly.
Besides, the odds of him getting injured are high, as usual.
The LOLs they are a multiplyin, always a sign of insecurity. Add more smileys now, that might really convince me...Federer just got schooled by Rublev, who is ranked lower than all those Nadal beat lol. Id give up if I was you lol. Not your finest hour is it.
Nadal was carrying an injury in 2015 actually.Nadal wasn't injured in 2015 when he lost to Fognini and couldn't make it to Djokovic in the quarters...
Djokovic is so BAD that he won 4 of the last 5 slams. And he simply can't lose to Rafa or RF in slams for many years.Djokovic is not as good as 2013..whats your point? We will never see peak v peak of any of them again, but they still good enough to be top 3.
Nadal was carrying an injury in 2015 actually.
Nadal was not injured in 2015, at least that's not the reason (for once) for his weak results. He had lost confidence and played his worst season ever.Show me the medical report. Thanks.
Lol this is hilarious. Nadal was YE1 in 2017 so even if we use 2017 as the yardstick (which is nonsensical as so long ago) Nadal would still be favourite. As Federer sais in New York in 2017..delpo had more chance v Nadal in SF than he did.From what we have seen since 2017. I cannot put Nadal ahead of Federer outside of clay. No matter the draw.
Uncle toni specifically said nadal had problems.Show me the medical report. Thanks.
Last time Nadal played Djokovic it was a bagel and breadstick...Djokovic is so BAD that he won 4 of the last 5 slams. And he simply can't lose to Rafa or RF in slams for many years.
Yes, his form sucks. You win. He is a total failure.
Uncle toni specifically said nadal had problems.
It's one of those imaginjuries.Show me the medical report. Thanks.
LOl...lol....lol....So you are saying the favourite is the one who loses in straight sets to the world no 78 rather than the one who wins Montreal beating the form player of past 3 weeks...glad you are not my lawyer lol.The LOLs they are a multiplyin, always a sign of insecurity. Add more smileys now, that might really convince me...
You are as usual mixing apples and oranges. Rublev beating RF in the 3rd round does NOT compare to beating him in the finale.
So Nadal being no 1 during Novak's worst year (due to injury mostly) is a valid argument?Lol this is hilarious. Nadal was YE1 in 2017 so even if we use 2017 as the yardstick (which is nonsensical as so long ago) Nadal would still be favourite. As Federer sais in New York in 2017..delpo had more chance v Nadal in SF than he did.
Nadal will utterly humiliate Federer at USO this year, although Federer wont make it far enough as usual for every Nadal fan's dream match up.
You are a clever chap...research it yourself, google would be a good start. I'll be generous,,check Tennis world facebook page.Link please. Thanks.
It's one of those imaginjuries.
Don't be a sore loser . admit defeat and move on. Nadal bagelled and breadsticked Djokovic last time they played, has the better h2h at USO, has won the last HC masters 1000...hence is favourite. Facts, not opinions.So Nadal being no 1 during Novak's worst year (due to injury mostly) is a valid argument?
Seriously, I am slowly suspecting you're trolling us all here. I've read your posts and every single one of them on this thread is a mix of bad logic, non-facts and random argumentation.
If you are trying to be funny, say it, be done with it, so we can laugh together.
I sure hope you're joking though...
Add more LOLs. And you forgot the smileys.LOl...lol....lol....So you are saying the favourite is the one who loses in straight sets to the world no 78 rather than the one who wins Montreal beating the form player of past 3 weeks...glad you are not my lawyer lol.
You are a clever chap...research it yourself, google would be a good start. I'll be generous,,check Tennis world facebook page.
But they are not Nadal fella...…):Add more LOLs. And you forgot the smileys.
I could of course list all the slam champs in the Open Era who won a slam just days or weeks after losing an early round. I could, but why would spend hours and hours writing them all up, just for you?
Ive just told you..Tennis World. I haven't saved the link as I tend not to be a library, but you so obsessed by this then you can scroll through their posts, I believe it was 2018 sometime after Roland Garros it was posted if memory serves me right.I cannot find it, which is why I am asking you. You must have heard this, or seen this somewhere. Please provide me with the link. Thanks.
He deals with facts, which is whyWell, I am curious, because this is news to me, and I would like to make sure I have the correct. And Pantera only deals with facts, so should be able to provide factual information to confirm this.
OK, now I know you're trolling...Don't be a sore loser . admit defeat and move on. Nadal bagelled and breadsticked Djokovic last time they played, has the better h2h at USO, has won the last HC masters 1000...hence is favourite. Facts, not opinions.
He deals with facts, which is why
OK, now I know you're trolling...
But because I want to indulge you, not blow your cover...
Nadal also won last year's Canadian. And what happened?
He also won it in 2005 and 2008. Did he win the USO?
Give up already, you're no match for me...
Yes, Nadal is one of them. 2010 Wimby he won despite losing at Queens in the QFs to clownish Lopez. Just one example.But they are not Nadal fella...…):
You just love making stuff up...Ive just told you..Tennis World. I haven't saved the link as I tend not to be a library, but you so obsessed by this then you can scroll through their posts, I believe it was 2018 sometime after Roland Garros it was posted if memory serves me right.
Im afraid I am schooling you and you are getting upset. I am sorry this is hurting but I am posting facts. 2008 Nadal was shattered after winning the OG, which was the priority at the time.He deals with facts, which is why
OK, now I know you're trolling...
But because I want to indulge you, not blow your cover...
Nadal also won last year's Canadian. And what happened?
He also won it in 2005 and 2008. Did he win the USO?
Give up already, you're no match for me...
That is irrelevant. He has an injury in nearly half the HC slams he plays. That's always a factor, we are talking about what will happen, not what MIGHT have happened had he always been injury-free.He didn't lose USO last year because of his level of play.
Queens was a 250 event back then....whats the relevance of a 250 event? Do you actually follow tennis? I mean that in all seriousness as it seems you cannot differentiate between a 250 event and 1000 event?Yes, Nadal is one of them. 2010 Wimby he won despite losing at Queens in the QFs to clownish Lopez. Just one example.
Check-mate.