Roger Federer beat Rafael Nadal 7-6(3), 1-6, 6-3, 6-4 in the Wimbledon semi-final, 2019 on grass
This was the pairs 4th meeting at the venue and first in 11 years. Federer had won finals in 2006 and 2007, Nadal had won in 2008. This result saw Federer extend his Wimbledon final reaching record to 12. He would go onto lose the final to Novak Djokovic
Federer won 126 points, Nadal 117
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (79/116) 68%
- 1st serve points won (58/79) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (23/37) 63%
- Aces 14
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/116) 33%
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (81/127) 63%
- 1st serve points won (60/81) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (22/46) 48%
- Aces 11 (1 not clean), Service Winners 3
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (52/127) 41%
Serve Pattern
Federer served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 61%
Nadal served...
- to FH 44%
- to BH 54%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 71 (32 FH, 39 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 38 Errors, comprising...
- 9* Unforced (1 FH, 8 BH), including 1 'SABR'
- 29 Forced (14 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (71/123) 58%
(*Note: Federer unsuccessfully challenged a Nadal serve that he returned. This has been counted as an Unforced Return Error for him and also an Unreturned Serve for Nadal)
Nadal made...
- 77 (34 FH, 43 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH)
- 19 Forced (7 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (77/115) 67%
Break Points
Federer 2/10 (6 games)
Nadal 2/8 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Federer 35 (17 FH, 5 BH, 3 FHV, 6 BHV, 4 OH)
Nadal 16 (8 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)
Federer's FHs - 7 cc, 2 dtl, 5 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 dtl/inside-out and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot at net cc
- 5 from serve-volley points
- 1 first volley (1 BHV)
- 4 second volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 6 inside-out
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 inside-out, 1 dtl running-down-drop-volley at net, 1 inside-in pass at net and 1 net chord dribbler
- the FHV was a drop
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Federer 48
- 29 Unforced (13 FH, 13 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 19 Forced (10 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.2
Nadal 49
- 24 Unforced (11 FH, 12 BH, 1 BHV)
- 25 Forced (15 FH, 10 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 23/32 (72%) at net, including...
- 9/12 (75%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/11 (82%) off 1st serve and...
- 0/1 off 2nd serve
Nadal was...
- 6/12 (12%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying (a first serve)
--
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Excellent display from Roger Federer in a match that deviates from most of the usual norms of the match up
Note -
a) Federer leading 68% to 63% first serve percentage
b) Nadal leading 74% to 73% first serve points won
c) Federer leading 63% to 48% second serve points won
d) Nadal leading 41% to 33% unreturned serve numbers
e) Federer serving more to one side than Nadal (to BH, Fed serves 61%, Nadal 54%... Fed's numbers aren't unusual but Nadal is usually up around 85-90%)
First set is even, with both players largely coasting on unreturned serves. Federer has the only break point and on it, the two players get into a lengthy and good rally, with Nadal dictating. Typically, it ends with a Federer BH UE. The tiebreak is going Nadal's way - he's up 3-2 with two serves to come - when Fed turns it up a notch on shot making. A good approach shot forces Nadal into a lobbing error, an excellent FH cc winner, a well judged serve-volley point where Fed conservatively hits third ball FH at net to draw a weak response that he smashes (it would be normal to go for an aggressive winner of a first 'volley' FH at net) gives him the next three points. He seals the set a couple of points later with a FH dtl winner to one of Nadal's powerful FH inside-outs that leaves the court open for Federer's counter, but is powerful enough to draw an error
Second set starts very lively and there are plenty of great attacking shots from both players in the first three games. Federer is in his twinkle footed mode. He has to save 2 break points in his first service game - which he does with winners at net. In the next game, he has 2 break points and Nadal saves 1 with a brilliant FH inside-out on the half-volley off a very deep Federer return. Other winning shots during this passage of play includes a crisp Fed BH cc, an off balance Nadal managing a BH cc pass, a Nadal BH inside-out forcing a Fed error, Nadal countering two excellent Federer volleys to finish with a BH inside-in pass at net, a brilliant Fed FH inside-out winner... great stuff all round, in short
Then, we see the dark side of great shotmaking. Fed is broken to love, missing 3rd ball FH winner attempts. It goes with the territory of the kind of game he plays. The other two points illustrate another feature of this match - relatively weak defence, as Fed makes 2 mildly forced errors. Nadal gets a second break in a genuinely poorly played game by his opponent... and Fed tanks the last game of the set (which illustrates another feature of the match - selective effort and conservation of energy)
The next two sets is some excellent, balanced tennis from Federer. There's shot making excellence and some of his standard 1-2 attacking plays, but for the most part, the 1-2 plays have been replaced by point construction with an attacking edge. There's forays to the net, including serve-volleying. There's deep returning that puts Nadal in a jam on the third ball. And there's solid neutral rallying - always with the danger of an attacking shot turning the dynamic upside down lurking behind it... Federer wining some critical, long rallies (often on important points), usually when Nadal is moderately dictating is another atypical feature of the match
Nadal of course, doesn't go down easy. After going down a break in the 3rd set, he has 3 break points in very next game. And in he pushes Fed as the Swiss serves out the match in the 4th set... but Fed is clearly the better player for the second half of the match
Now, what's going on with all the unusual numbers for the match?
Serve & Return
Nadal is generally not thought of as a big server, and rightfully so. Round about this time though, he was serving more aggressively than he'd done over his career. Even so, Fed's serve is significantly stronger... so why is does Nadal have a 15% lead in unreturned serves?
Mostly due to the returning strategies of the two players. In the past, Federer tended to prioritize consistency (getting more balls back in play) over doing damage (hitting winners, forcing errors or otherwise giving Nadal a difficult 3rd ball) with the return. Here though, he's switched gears. Fed almost always comes over the BH return (in the past, he was apt to chip most of the time) and is attacking of the FH too (that's not different from the past).
Federer isn't overly aggressive with the return. Not much chance of him hitting winners with it... the focus is more on getting the ball deep with moderate power. He's successful and curbs Nadal's ability to take charge of the point with a big third ball FH. The cost is a lower return rate. Nominally, 58% poor from Federer against Nadal - even on grass (in 2007 final, it was 80%. In 2008, 73%)
The returning sub-strategy fits into Federer's overall match plan. He doesn't seem overly concerned with making an impact on return games and is happy to look after his own service game, while waiting for chances on return. Somewhat like Pete Sampras used to. A good shift, given his obvious stamina issues
Note Federer's high 9 return unforced errors (Nadal has 5). He misses a number of makeable returns that have been marked forced too... change in strategy aside, his return has room for improvement in terms of consistency.
I thought Nadal erred in not serving to the BH more. The BH return might have improved relative to what it used to be, but its still a step down from the FH return (UEs - BH 8, FH 1)… despite Nadal serving 44% to FH to 54% to BH. Roughly, a 40/60 distribution would probably have been preferable
Nadal by contrast strategically looks to raise consistency at the cost of doing damaging. He's returning from his usual, very far back position all match.... but retreats still further after the first set, and stays just as far back for second serves as he does firsts. This allows him to get more balls back and like Federer, he gets a number of balls back problematically deep
Serve-Return dynamics shape...
This was the pairs 4th meeting at the venue and first in 11 years. Federer had won finals in 2006 and 2007, Nadal had won in 2008. This result saw Federer extend his Wimbledon final reaching record to 12. He would go onto lose the final to Novak Djokovic
Federer won 126 points, Nadal 117
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (79/116) 68%
- 1st serve points won (58/79) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (23/37) 63%
- Aces 14
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/116) 33%
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (81/127) 63%
- 1st serve points won (60/81) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (22/46) 48%
- Aces 11 (1 not clean), Service Winners 3
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (52/127) 41%
Serve Pattern
Federer served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 61%
Nadal served...
- to FH 44%
- to BH 54%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 71 (32 FH, 39 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 38 Errors, comprising...
- 9* Unforced (1 FH, 8 BH), including 1 'SABR'
- 29 Forced (14 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (71/123) 58%
(*Note: Federer unsuccessfully challenged a Nadal serve that he returned. This has been counted as an Unforced Return Error for him and also an Unreturned Serve for Nadal)
Nadal made...
- 77 (34 FH, 43 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH)
- 19 Forced (7 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (77/115) 67%
Break Points
Federer 2/10 (6 games)
Nadal 2/8 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Federer 35 (17 FH, 5 BH, 3 FHV, 6 BHV, 4 OH)
Nadal 16 (8 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)
Federer's FHs - 7 cc, 2 dtl, 5 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 dtl/inside-out and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot at net cc
- 5 from serve-volley points
- 1 first volley (1 BHV)
- 4 second volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 6 inside-out
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 inside-out, 1 dtl running-down-drop-volley at net, 1 inside-in pass at net and 1 net chord dribbler
- the FHV was a drop
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Federer 48
- 29 Unforced (13 FH, 13 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 19 Forced (10 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.2
Nadal 49
- 24 Unforced (11 FH, 12 BH, 1 BHV)
- 25 Forced (15 FH, 10 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 23/32 (72%) at net, including...
- 9/12 (75%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 9/11 (82%) off 1st serve and...
- 0/1 off 2nd serve
Nadal was...
- 6/12 (12%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying (a first serve)
--
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Excellent display from Roger Federer in a match that deviates from most of the usual norms of the match up
Note -
a) Federer leading 68% to 63% first serve percentage
b) Nadal leading 74% to 73% first serve points won
c) Federer leading 63% to 48% second serve points won
d) Nadal leading 41% to 33% unreturned serve numbers
e) Federer serving more to one side than Nadal (to BH, Fed serves 61%, Nadal 54%... Fed's numbers aren't unusual but Nadal is usually up around 85-90%)
First set is even, with both players largely coasting on unreturned serves. Federer has the only break point and on it, the two players get into a lengthy and good rally, with Nadal dictating. Typically, it ends with a Federer BH UE. The tiebreak is going Nadal's way - he's up 3-2 with two serves to come - when Fed turns it up a notch on shot making. A good approach shot forces Nadal into a lobbing error, an excellent FH cc winner, a well judged serve-volley point where Fed conservatively hits third ball FH at net to draw a weak response that he smashes (it would be normal to go for an aggressive winner of a first 'volley' FH at net) gives him the next three points. He seals the set a couple of points later with a FH dtl winner to one of Nadal's powerful FH inside-outs that leaves the court open for Federer's counter, but is powerful enough to draw an error
Second set starts very lively and there are plenty of great attacking shots from both players in the first three games. Federer is in his twinkle footed mode. He has to save 2 break points in his first service game - which he does with winners at net. In the next game, he has 2 break points and Nadal saves 1 with a brilliant FH inside-out on the half-volley off a very deep Federer return. Other winning shots during this passage of play includes a crisp Fed BH cc, an off balance Nadal managing a BH cc pass, a Nadal BH inside-out forcing a Fed error, Nadal countering two excellent Federer volleys to finish with a BH inside-in pass at net, a brilliant Fed FH inside-out winner... great stuff all round, in short
Then, we see the dark side of great shotmaking. Fed is broken to love, missing 3rd ball FH winner attempts. It goes with the territory of the kind of game he plays. The other two points illustrate another feature of this match - relatively weak defence, as Fed makes 2 mildly forced errors. Nadal gets a second break in a genuinely poorly played game by his opponent... and Fed tanks the last game of the set (which illustrates another feature of the match - selective effort and conservation of energy)
The next two sets is some excellent, balanced tennis from Federer. There's shot making excellence and some of his standard 1-2 attacking plays, but for the most part, the 1-2 plays have been replaced by point construction with an attacking edge. There's forays to the net, including serve-volleying. There's deep returning that puts Nadal in a jam on the third ball. And there's solid neutral rallying - always with the danger of an attacking shot turning the dynamic upside down lurking behind it... Federer wining some critical, long rallies (often on important points), usually when Nadal is moderately dictating is another atypical feature of the match
Nadal of course, doesn't go down easy. After going down a break in the 3rd set, he has 3 break points in very next game. And in he pushes Fed as the Swiss serves out the match in the 4th set... but Fed is clearly the better player for the second half of the match
Now, what's going on with all the unusual numbers for the match?
Serve & Return
Nadal is generally not thought of as a big server, and rightfully so. Round about this time though, he was serving more aggressively than he'd done over his career. Even so, Fed's serve is significantly stronger... so why is does Nadal have a 15% lead in unreturned serves?
Mostly due to the returning strategies of the two players. In the past, Federer tended to prioritize consistency (getting more balls back in play) over doing damage (hitting winners, forcing errors or otherwise giving Nadal a difficult 3rd ball) with the return. Here though, he's switched gears. Fed almost always comes over the BH return (in the past, he was apt to chip most of the time) and is attacking of the FH too (that's not different from the past).
Federer isn't overly aggressive with the return. Not much chance of him hitting winners with it... the focus is more on getting the ball deep with moderate power. He's successful and curbs Nadal's ability to take charge of the point with a big third ball FH. The cost is a lower return rate. Nominally, 58% poor from Federer against Nadal - even on grass (in 2007 final, it was 80%. In 2008, 73%)
The returning sub-strategy fits into Federer's overall match plan. He doesn't seem overly concerned with making an impact on return games and is happy to look after his own service game, while waiting for chances on return. Somewhat like Pete Sampras used to. A good shift, given his obvious stamina issues
Note Federer's high 9 return unforced errors (Nadal has 5). He misses a number of makeable returns that have been marked forced too... change in strategy aside, his return has room for improvement in terms of consistency.
I thought Nadal erred in not serving to the BH more. The BH return might have improved relative to what it used to be, but its still a step down from the FH return (UEs - BH 8, FH 1)… despite Nadal serving 44% to FH to 54% to BH. Roughly, a 40/60 distribution would probably have been preferable
Nadal by contrast strategically looks to raise consistency at the cost of doing damaging. He's returning from his usual, very far back position all match.... but retreats still further after the first set, and stays just as far back for second serves as he does firsts. This allows him to get more balls back and like Federer, he gets a number of balls back problematically deep
Serve-Return dynamics shape...
Last edited: