200Below what number is an IQ considered low?
I’m more than half way there. I know I’ll reach 200 in 10 years time.
You passed! If you had paid money, you would have failed.I took a test today and when I click "get result" they wanted some money. Do they think I'm dumb?
You forgot to use spelling IQ - it's a red line.@dgold44 says he wouldn't do it because he is smart to know that an alibi can come in handy. You, as a Hitchcock connoisseur, should know that.
I misspelt connoisseur in a threat about IQ. Awesum.
I'll bet you also always get a 100 in humility too.I always score 100's. I am that smart. 100 is the best you can get, so I would obviously get a 100...
Did you graduate in the top 100% of your class?I always score 100's. I am that smart. 100 is the best you can get, so I would obviously get a 100...
I have no idea where I was in relationship to the rest of my class. I'm serious. I was in the top 100% of the music school. My teachers wanted me to enter piano competitions. Always first chair in the wind ensemble. Majored in piano and did brass as a principle instrument, which was unheard of. Starting making money accompanying, competing with gradutate students in my freshman year. Passed the sightsinging final exam for second year before ever setting foot in a class. Aced every theory exam. And so on.
I scored 100% in the citizenship test. Can I use that as my IQ certificate?I always score 100's. I am that smart. 100 is the best you can get, so I would obviously get a 100...
FTFYFederer, DelPops and Murray fan, so 17,5.
Wow, i believe that qualifies for the triple nine society!!0.1 x Sabroosh.
Almost, but I did graduate. Almost, but I did entirely for sure.
I also have notice that some extremely smart people don't do much with it either. The ones that are like mini geniuses but you never knew.I'll bet you also always get a 100 in humility too.
Being serious for a moment: any score you get for "intelligence" is only relative in areas in which the kind of skills tested are important. An IQ test is utterly useless for testing musical aptitude because it does not test things that are important to musicians. I consider IQ absolutely useless for telling me anything I need to know about myself or the people I teach.
Very well said. Dgold44 should take this to heart especially when tagging civil servants, nurses and his customers with arbitrary numbers. I realize this lies outside of the context you mention.I'll bet you also always get a 100 in humility too.
Being serious for a moment: any score you get for "intelligence" is only relative in areas in which the kind of skills tested are important. An IQ test is utterly useless for testing musical aptitude because it does not test things that are important to musicians. I consider IQ absolutely useless for telling me anything I need to know about myself or the people I teach.
FTFYMy IQ is 100
In base 9
The problem is that there is no score for desire, and there is no measure for creativity. For instance, Mozart was dead at age 35, so we don't know what he could have done if he lived decades longer, but in that fairly short time he created masterpieces that make people's jaws drop today. People speculate that his IQ must have been astronomical. Supposedly he could write symphonies while traveling in a carriage, just working out everything in his head and writing it down.I also have notice that some extremely smart people don't do much with it either. The ones that are like mini geniuses but you never knew.
But I guess you can say that with a lot of talents and skills.
I donut use the read squeaglie line. Evur.You forgot to use spelling IQ - it's a red line.
I found yesterday that when you have been "lead", as when you are following, it's "led". Somehow I've been mispelling that for about 65 years. The little red spelling IQ line is not smart enough to correct some things.
THAT is it. The ability to focus, struggle, and persevere. That is the real catalyst for true genius to flourish. Also, I have found some people who have natural abilities for something seem to lack any interest in it, which fails to stoke their passion and ability to achieve much of anything. It is sad, as it deprives the person and humanity of perhaps masterpieces or revolutionary discoveries.The problem is that there is no score for desire, and there is no measure for creativity. For instance, Mozart was dead at age 35, so we don't know what he could have done if he lived decades longer, but in that fairly short time he created masterpieces that make people's jaws drop today. People speculate that his IQ must have been astronomical. Supposedly he could write symphonies while traveling in a carriage, just working out everything in his head and writing it down.
Beethoven, in contrast, was know for struggling. His manuscripts show music crossed out, reworked. It's as if he almost left his blood on the pages, getting things right in his mind. His creative process was night and day different from Mozart's. Often his sketches seems downright primitive compared to his final versions.
But who of those two was the greater genius? I'd say it is a toss-up.
According to biographers there were better mathematicians by far then Einstein, and he had to turn to others for help when trying to complete the math to support his own theories. He was known for thought experiments where he figured things out in logical, non-mathematical ways. But non one today says, "Old Einstein wasn't really too smart. He didn't always get the best grades in school at all times and even struggled in some areas."
Personally I think the ability to struggle through and get to goals without ever giving up is a kind of talent that is not thought about much. There is no "perseverance section" on an IQ test, and in fact we don't even know how much IQ scores are dependent on the will to get through them and prove to the world how smart we are...
I don't think so. That is a common myth. Einstein might not have scored his true IQ in a traditional test, but he was an accomplished (LOL) scientist and teacher and an extremely articulate writer. He wouldn't "fail miserably" in a traditional IQ test.I am sure Einstein would fail miserably in the traditional IQ test. He was a slow thinker with a hint of asperger.
High IQ is about being able to think out of the box to solve a problem. It’s often the opposite of what people think. It’s not like a generic nerd type of thinking, they are often too closed. To see things from many perspectives. So it’s not typical for a high IQ person to have low social intelligence as many thinks. It’s a stereotype thing to think people w high IQ is like a nerd w little sense of reality.
I don't think so. That is a common myth. Einstein might not have scored his true IQ in a traditional test, but he was an accomplished (LOL) scientist and teacher and an extremely articulate writer. He wouldn't "fail miserably" in a traditional IQ test.
What’s so strange about that?An interesting aspect of IQ is how everyone seems to score above its average.
The traditional IQ test is also for street-smarts and not for complex thinkers. If you give them (complex thinkers) a problem, they might find one too many ways to solve it and that might confuse them, because they wouldn't know which one to arrive with and might require a lot more thoughts. And also, they may find problems with the problem.
I scored 128 in high school.
I took one a few years ago and I was only at 115.
Doubt I'd be close to there now.
I am truly getting old, fat and dumberer.
No, quite the opposite. That means you're very ordinary and lack creativity. You need to know the laws and rules to manage a life. You need an authority to regulate things for you and you think it's good for everyone.I scored 100% in the citizenship test. Can I use that as my IQ certificate?
Peaked too early.I was in top 150 in a nation wide skills test when I was 14 years old. I went downhill after that too.
No parent would accept their children are dumb. But dumb parents will make dumb kids.An interesting aspect of IQ is how everyone seems to score above its average.
My iq scores went down w the years tooI scored 128 in high school.
I took one a few years ago and I was only at 115.
Doubt I'd be close to there now.
I am truly getting old, fat and dumberer.
I agree with you, but there is another aspect to this. I will admit reluctantly that I'm somewhere between confident and arrogant about my own thinking ability, and that causes me to totally fuzz out when I'm asked to do anything I think is stupid. To me IQ tests are stupid, so I can't focus. If you ask me to take a test, I immediately start to analyze the questions, and the moment I decide a question is stupid - or ambiguous - it sets off annoyance. Then if someone pushes me to continue, against my will. that annoyance turns to rage and I frankly want to destroy the person who is forcing me to do what I don't want to do.I don't think so. That is a common myth. Einstein might not have scored his true IQ in a traditional test, but he was an accomplished (LOL) scientist and teacher and an extremely articulate writer. He wouldn't "fail miserably" in a traditional IQ test.
You need business leadership training. Then you’d know, there are no stupid questionsI agree with you, but there is another aspect to this. I will admit reluctantly that I'm somewhere between confident and arrogant about my own thinking ability, and that causes me to totally fuzz out when I'm asked to do anything I think is stupid. To me IQ tests are stupid, so I can't focus. If you ask me to take a test, I immediately start to analyze the questions, and the moment I decide a question is stupid - or ambiguous - it sets off annoyance. Then if someone pushes me to continue, against my will. that annoyance turns to rage and I frankly want to destroy the person who is forcing me to do what I don't want to do.
Stupid questions infuriate me because to me it is a sign that someone who really IS stupid, or careless, somehow gets to monopolize my time.
No parent would accept their children are dumb. But dumb parents will make dumb kids.