This is quite the post.
Roddick at Wimbledon and here's why.
The 2009 Finals was the closest loss in OE. Yes closer than Fed's 2019 WMB & 09 Fed was a greater opponent than 19 Novak.
Not even remotely close to the closest loss in OE. Fed in 2019 was obviously closer. Federer was the better player in 4/5 sets so if anything the scoreline makes it seem more competitive than it was. Fed in 2019 had won his two sets by 4 breaks combined and lost in 3 tiebreakers while having more break chances throughout and a SP in set 3 and a MP in set 5. There are many many matches closer than the 09 final.
There's also the residual effect with Roddick losing a 5 setter to Gasquet in 07 QF that was largely mental because of his 03-05 scars.
He lost to teenage Murray, Gasquet, and Tipsarevic in consecutive years during his prime. I don't care if confidence is the reason that's inexcusable. Confidence is part of what makes a player good and if Andy doesn't have it that's on him. There's no excuse for losing to Gasquet period.
Lastly, nobody but Fed could beat Roddick in those 4 years that we know of and likely 1 more if Andy isn't mentally obliterated.
If you are talking all time this is one of the most laughable statements of all time if you mean in those individual tournaments still no. Hewitt a clear favorite in 05 and has a good chance in 04. If you're saying no one else beats him in 03 well the best player he'd have to face would've been Schalken/Philli lmao. In 09 he would've beaten hip Hewitt (5 sets), pre-prime Murray (In a 50/50 match), and Haas. Saying he would've won those without Fed isn't saying much. Borg wins a couple UOs without either Mac or Connors. Murray grabs at least 1 AO without Novak.
Murray couldn't beat a past prime Fed except once and a very great Novak yes but he wasn't always in the zone of 15-16. There was 2013 at least and never was Andy close in their meetings except once to Roddick 05 level.
I think you need to rewatch the 2016 AO if you think Novak wasn't in the zone by the end of that tournament. Murray was always above Roddick 05 level. Roddick 05 was a joke compared to 03/04. Saying Roddick 05 is better than every AO Murray is one of the most ludicrous, biased statements I've heard on here and that means a whole lot with all the prize money/ELO ********s, clay doesn't count Fedrtards, and 17 USO is strong Dulltards. Another suggested match for your rewatch: 2012 AO SF.
Borg at USO was just not good enough. Mac, Jimbo & even Tanner.
You say that as if these guys are some scrubs. Jimbo is USO GOAT and Mac might be the most talented player in the history of the game. Mac's best is as dominant as anyone's and Borg was challenging these dudes. Tanner is better than Gasquet lol. Borg is an easy choice in this poll. The number of Roddick voters makes me seriously question TTW's tennis knowledge. At least you can make a longevity argument for Murray but even that is flimsy. This poll should be 75% Borg.
Sobin Soderling at FO should be a wildcard.
Lmfao why because Fedr beat him in a RG final so he must be stronk competition. Mans made the QF 3 times and never took a set in either RG final. Not sure why RG Murray is up there but he's still a better choice than Soderling.