zill
Legend
Then Thiem would have the highest combined rpm on both sides by a large margin. Would he then have dominated Nadal on clay throughout his career?
But having Gasquets would not get him over the hump.
Yes, but I think his forehand and movement are his biggest problems vs Rafa.Averaging over 6000 rpm combined is huge though.
Yes, but I think his forehand and movement are his biggest problems vs Rafa.
No, his forehand does not hurt Rafa. Thiem is the one running around everywhere. His backhand is not the problem. Sure it could be more affective, but it is not the difference in dominating Rafa or not. It is a small part of the reason.Thiem has a really good forehand lol. One of the best in the world. Moves really well too.
Je mapelle fromagesi ma tante était thiem, je l'appellerais mon oncle
think about it
It looks better than the effectiveness.I find Gasquet's BH extremely overrated.
I think the opposite actually. It's just serve+forehand that's dire for him.I find Gasquet's BH extremely overrated.
Gasquet's backhand is hugely overrated. Thinking it would give Thiem the W over Nadal is a new high in this area.
Actually, it's hugely underrated. In this forum at least. Like in many other cases, people can't separate a shot from the overall success of a player.
Gasquet's backhand is hugely overrated. Thinking it would give Thiem the W over Nadal is a new high in this area.
I can't stand how much people ignore return when talking about a shot.Gasquets backhand return is so much better than Thiem and Wawrinkas.
Exactly!Look at RAFA’s H2H against Reeshard
Ceci n'est pas un postsi ma tante était thiem, je l'appellerais mon oncle
think about it
Not at all. I think he gave up way too much ground when winding up for the one hander leaving him vulnerable to a shot to his forehand after. And it wasn't a great return weapon, slice wasn't great, taking the ball on the rise wasn't a forte of his diminishing effectiveness of his Backhand DTL, etc. etc. (and please no shot reels, I know he could hit Backhands DTL). I would take the Man's backhand any day of the week, as well as Acasuso or Almagro's.
If I was Federer and someone said, "hey, here's Richard's backhand, we're going to swap yours for his!" I'd choke laughing, until I realized they were serious at which point my laughter would turn to horror
How do you know?But you are not Federer, obviously.
Yes, it's very underrated here nowadays. Everyone was thrilled with it when he started playing, they liked Wawrinka's too but not as much. That lasted for years, then Richard turned out to be a ladies lovin, coke snorting party animal who is wasting his potentials, while at the same time Stanislas started winning big and the treatments of their backhands switched places. Gasquet of course has a fantastic backhand - cross-court, down the line, power, spin, angles, placement, grass, clay, on the move, a return weapon at least as much as any other one-hander, handling high topspin balls better than most one-handers etc. It's one of the best single handed backhands ever, only people tend to confuse the player's career statistics and what his or her shot can do.
How do you know?
Maybe I want you to think I'm not. It'd be a good cover, after all. You're not expecting something as obvious as "My *cough* I mean Federer's competition was GOAT, ROFLMAO!!!"Things you say give you away.