I said Berrettini was really good in the Wimbledon final.
Lol. Roddick was pathetic in that match. I was going to give @NatF a pass on this one, but since you felt the need to tag me, let's take a deeper look. Roddick got absolutely destroyed, making only 19 winners and 16 unforced errors on grass, in a best of 5 match, and faster grass than 2021 at that. 19/175 (points) means he only made a winner 10.86% of the time. Compared to Berrettini who made a winner (57/276) 20.65% of the time. Not to mention that Roddick could only win 21% of return points, which is horrid, compared to Berretini at 31%. The only significant thing Roddick did better than Berrettini was make less errors 9.1% (16/175) compared to Berrettini at 17.4% (48/276 ) but considering how little winners he hit, that's not saying much. It amazes me the extent that some of you go to bolster Federer's competition, even a performance as terrible as that one. Hell, even Gonzalez and Kiefer did better than he did. Lol
…it’s a testament to his immense arm talent that his serve and FH are top 5 on the current ATP tour,…
It is incredible how many balls he sends into the net though. A 2 minute perusal there I counted 5, lol.Anyone that saw Berry making the SFs two years after this match (or ever) either has a genius eye for tennis or is full of it.
#BerrettiniOpen
It is incredible how many balls he sends into the net though. A 2 minute perusal there I counted 5, lol.…
Not to mention he took a set off Djokovic. Not bad for a player who supposedly lost before he walked onto the court.Yes, imagine being nervous playing the first slam final ever in your life, such a disgrace. Let the tennis experts here explain how much of a mug he is, they’ve never played a professional tournament in their life but at least had the time to watch ton of highlights on youtube while eating their sandwich with their fat butt resting on a couch. Surely Berrettini could learn a thing or two from them.
Was Federer a 10/10? Maybe if Nadal of the RG 08 final was a strong 10/10 this could be a weak 10/10.I guess. Berrettini looks better than he was because he was facing an 7.5/10 rather than a 10/10.
Was Federer a 10/10? Maybe if Nadal of the RG 08 final was a strong 10/10 this could be a weak 10/10.
What would you give Nadal of RG 2007/2010 finals?Federer was basically flawless don't think there's much in it.
What would you give Nadal of RG 2007/2010 finals?
So bar maybe FO 2008 maybe Federer was equal or a tiny bit better than all other versions.9.5/10 or something.
So bar maybe FO 2008 maybe Federer was equal or a tiny bit better than all other versions.
It is not just you I have heard arguments for 2003-2006 Federer on grass and a peak Borg on clay not being too far off a peak Nadal on clay.I think I probably see these things a bit differently to most other people. I think A games for both a similar with maybe a slight edge to Nadal, but I think Nadal's B game on clay is much more unbeatable and is what we've seen with his incredible record despite his physical decline.
I don't recall anybody in here saying anything about Djokovic being in his peak. I think we all can agree on when that was. However, I'm just not in agreeance with you that a player who was 3 sets away from a CYGS is past his prime. Since June 2018 until now, Djokovic has won 87.7% of his matches, including 94% in Slams and 76.7% against the top 10. There's just no way I can agree with you on that. For all we know, Djokovic could drop off a cliff next year and then you can be saying how past his prime he is but as of now, he is the best player in the world and has been for pretty much 3 years now.
I said Berrettini was really good in the Wimbledon final. He was the 2nd best grass player this year after all, and he was good this year. My only indictment on 2004 was that none of that the top 10 could beat Federer in any match. Roddick was excellent in the 2004 Wimbledon final, way higher than Berrettini but we aren't talking about 2004. Never said the top 10 this year was this major strong competition. I just said it's not as weak as the choir on here that keeps saying as much.
Humility over what? I'm just stating the obvious, the way I see it, and what I believe. None of Djokovic's achievements are my own so what do I have to be less than humble about?
It is not just you I have heard arguments for 2003-2006 Federer on grass and a peak Borg on clay not being too far off a peak Nadal on clay.
I don’t Roddick or Berrettini were clearly better than the other in 2005 vs 2021.
Pete is considered up at that level by some but his fans would rather fight it out with Federer fans rather than make that caseBorg on clay is right there with Nadal if we adjust for era and tech IMO, he was extremely dominant. Would put PETE on grass in the same sort of bracket too.
I don’t really have a take but it is good to see the points from both sides on why people think one was playing better than the other.Meh, whether it's clear or slight Roddick was better IMO. His main issue was being so predictable and playing his approaches a bit too safely to the Fed's backhand - not really a problem against Berr. Plus I actually expect Roddick's superior movement and backhand to give him an advantage in neutral rallies. Berrettini was hitting his forehand bigger in 2021 and hit more winners but he also hit a lot more errors while Roddick forced more errors with his. Fed's movement in 2005 was also quite ridiculous and he was hitting a much heavier and more potent ball than Djokovic, I don't think Berrettini would have the opportunity to hit nearly as many winners agaisnt Fed as he did Djokovic.
Okey got it. I wasn't sure which match you were referring to.
As I told you, ludicrous to claim all roddicks finals were better than Berrettinis. Even the USO one were he won a total of 3 games in 2 sets was apparently a better performance than Berrettini did. They will spin anything around for their dear Roddick in their quest to bully current players.
Pete is considered up at that level by some but his fans would rather fight it out with Federer fans rather than make that case
I don’t really have a take but it is good to see the points from both sides on why people think one was playing better than the other.
Well Fed won 91% of his matches in 2017 but I don't consider that a prime year from him, Fed was pretty dominant outside of Djokovic in 2015 but I don't consider that prime either. Results are often indicative of form and I guess "prime" but not always IMO. I don't consider 2019'Dal better or prime over say 2007 or 2011'Dal because he was #1 and won two slams to one to give another example. IMO you could consider Wimby 2018-AO 2019 prime Djokovic but afterwards I think there has been a clear drop off in his level of play. He's had to win ugly in a lot of matches since then (particularly this year) which I just don't think he'd need to do if he was actually in his prime.
And I heavily disagree that he was really good...the stats actually favour Roddick on the whole despite playing a guy that was playing much better than Djokovic was and posing much more difficult questions and Roddick wasn't good in his final - more mediocre and suffering from poor shot selection and tactics.
There's an obvious air of bragging and smugness to some of your posts recently mate. We all do it from time to time.
Berrettini was in his 1st.
But there is a difference from an outlier like 2017 where he won 91% of his matches (52-5) over a few months (Jan-April, June-July, August-November) versus a player who went 186-15 over the course of 3 years and won 87.7% of his matches. That's not an outlier and shows a sustained high level over a much longer period of time. Therefore, after looking at it closely I believe he was still in his prime.
Well Roddick had been in Slam finals before, had won a Slam, and Berrettini was in his 1st. Roddick's tactics in that match is why he got destroyed so badly and not sure what Goldfine was thinking having him come to net so much and off poor approach shots at that. Federer hammered him. He should have stuck to what worked so well in 2004 where he had Federer on the ropes and used his serve and forehand. That's why it wasn't a good performance in my eyes, especially for a player who was ranked #1 and been in this position before. Berrettini made quite a bit of errors but he went after his shots, and used his serve and forehand to at least make Djokovic work for it.
Ok well I guess we all are guilty of bragging about our favorite player from time to time.
Stan won his 1st slam final.
And the 2nd.
And the 3rd.
Against world #1.
Roddick's tale is one of tragedy and poor decisions this is true. Too be fair Federer's backhand was fire that match, ridiculous off the pass. Obviously once he realised it wasn't work he should have changed it up but I think as an initial strategy it wasn't the worst idea.
I think Covid muddies those numbers for Djokovic a bit to be fair, he's played quite selectively in 20/21 (like Fed in 2017) if he played a fuller calendar his numbers would be worse for sure. Like I said for me results are part of it but not all, maybe I just rate Djokovic's prime a bit higher than you do?
Some cry before matches (Berrettini), some during matches (Djokovic) and some after matches (Federer). And some never cry at all (Nadal).What it means? What it tells us ?
Well Federer's whole game was fire in this match but he was fire in 2004 as well. I think 2004 and 2005 are his highest levels at Wimbledon personally. Roddick just didn't have a good gameplan at all and it was like he was lost out there with all those bad approaches. Volleying was never Roddick's strength but the balls just weren't deep or angled enough to be approaching on Federer like that.
Well he started off 2020 at 18-0 before covid and he was going to probably do more damage if his momentum wasn't halted. He has played selectively, especially in 2021, but was going to play a fuller schedule last year.
Man we're just not going to agree on Djokovic, it seems so obvious to me that his play has dimished. I feel like actual prime Djokovic rolls through the likes of Mussetti, Berrettini, Tsitipas, Zverev etc...much more easily. He had so many drops of intensity that cost him sets this year, this happened in prior years as well but not as much IMO.
No player prime or not will just roll over people all the time. Are you already forgetting Djokovic had Musetti type of matches even in the years he was considered at his peak? Simon AO 16, Lopez USO 15, I can name many matches more. Federer also had same type of matches were he struggled.
It's such a pointless argument cause no past version of any player was just rolling over people all the time, you always had matches where you have to fight hard to win cause you are not on your best game that day.
No player prime or not will just roll over people all the time. Are you already forgetting Djokovic had Musetti type of matches even in the years he was considered at his peak? Simon AO 16, Lopez USO 15, Agut FO 16,I can name many matches more. Federer also had same type of matches were he struggled.
It's such a pointless argument cause no past version of any player was just rolling over people all the time, you always had matches where you have to fight hard to win cause you are not on your best game that day.
It's true that Djokovic was playing at a higher level generally from the baseline in his physical prime, but Djokovic nowadays is generally better in the big moments. E.g. 2012 Djokovic played incredibly in the Olympics and US Open and then wilted in the final moments.Think it's been more regular this year. Quality of hitting and movement just isn't the same IMO.
It's true that Djokovic was playing at a higher level generally from the baseline in his physical prime, but Djokovic nowadays is generally better in the big moments. E.g. 2012 Djokovic played incredibly in the Olympics and US Open and then wilted in the final moments.
Younger Djokovic had quite a lot of underperformances in key moments at slams, especially in 2012-14. I can't imagine that 2019-2021 Djokovic would ever not win the 2014 US Open against Nishikori and Cilic, for example.
The accumulation of success in big moments definitely counts for a lot if you can maintain your physical level and improve shots that were weaker when you were younger (serve is the obvious one for Djokovic; BH for Federer/Nadal).
Shame he didn't forget to drop those unforced errors.
Lopez US15 was closer than it looks on paper. Feliciano was playing incredible tennis for large stretches of that match, and it could easily have gone the distance. It was an exciting match with some nice display of different brands of tennis
That said, I think Novak's form this year would not have won him 3 slams in a year like for instance the mentioned 2015.
The strength of competition, especially on clay, obviously is part of why Djokovic won fewer slams in that period. 2011-2013 is probably the most competitive period in ATP history at the absolute top of the game. Djokovic, Nadal, Federer, Murray all at the top + high level spoilers in the mix. You can maybe extend that to mid-2014, before Nadal's drop off.It's true that mentally Djokovic was poor at times in that spell I also think the competition in those years was a lot strong though as well which factors in too. Djokovic IMO is mentally bolstered by having the physical edge over his opponents, which helps him when he goes behind in a match etc...when the chips are down he relies on physicality more than shotmaking IMO (with some notable exceptions). He'd have to rely on shotmaking in those years which is lower percentage and more likely to end in defeat.
Obviously 2019/2020 Djokovic didn't go anywhere at the USO so I assume you mean if he got to that position? It's possible that he doesn't underperform but then I'm not sure he does based on thi year, unless we're chalked it all up to the CYGS.
Games won to loss isn’t always a great metric but I get the point you make.2005 Roddick only won 2 less games that ATG Murray in 2015. And he was playing a much better opponent.
So even at his worst he wasn't awful.
Not bad tennis but Djokovic playing at his best shouldn’t end 2 sets to love down vs Musetti or Tpas.And Musetti, Tsitsi etc were playing bad tennis to win their sets or?
Fed's grass season in 2004 was probably his best, I think he didn't hit top form in the beginning of the final - partly due to the sheer power from Roddick but his game clicked in a big way in the third and fourth. I'd probably put 2005/2003 as his best at Wimbledon but I do love 2004 as well. I think part of the problem was confidence in 2005, he was trying to execute a bit of an alien gameplan and it was the wrong gameplan and the execution wasn't good enough. Mac was complaining that he was getting too close to the net which was giving Fed a bit more room to work with on the pass. There were moments with pretty good approaches and shots that Fed just returned with sheer brilliance though. Like I said I think a worse opponent would have given Roddick much more to get his teeth into, the quality of ball coming from the Fed racket didn't give Arod many chances to attack.
Man we're just not going to agree on Djokovic, it seems so obvious to me that his play has dimished. I feel like actual prime Djokovic rolls through the likes of Mussetti, Berrettini, Tsitipas, Zverev etc...much more easily. He had so many drops of intensity that cost him sets this year, this happened in prior years as well but not as much IMO.
At least, he did not hyperventilate."I had knots in my stomach. I tried to force myself to eat, but it was hard to deal with pressure. I was in the locker room, and there were only Novak and me. He had already played over 30 Major finals and was more used to it than me; he could surely feel the tension. He was relaxing with music in his headphones, and I was there like, 'I can not even eat some rice. How am I supposed to play?' I remember my hands were sweating, I could not eat, and my head started spinning when I talked to my team."
NextGen is providing some stiff competition, would you agree?
2004 proved Roddick could hang with peak Federer though. He just didn't bring that level of ballstriking in 2005 and his strategy wasn't good enough.
I don't know about his play has diminished but he's not at his peak. I think we all see that. Someone who went 94% in 12 Slams from 2018 Wimbledon to 2021 USO just isn't "past it" my view. Agree to disagree on this.
i just realized this exists, and i am all the better off for it
Yes because taking 2004 or 2009 Fed to four and five is the same as Berrittini going four with 2021 Djokovic Maybe try and keep your hot takes to one every 24 hours, you've already exhausted your quota with your "Medvedev is the greatest baseliner" gaff.