2021 Yonex VCore 95

A

ajlee0929

New User
I just bought a new vcore 95 (poly tour rev 16L at 53 lbs) and it feels much more muted than my vcore 95 that I bought used (lynx tour at 50 lbs, but tension probably dropped as I don't know how long ago it was strung). The used one gives a much more pronounced "tinging" sound/feel and I can sense the vibrations lingering in my hands a lot more.

Does anybody know if this difference is due to the racquet (inconsistent quality/build) or the strings? Or any other factors? I demoed a vcore 95 before (unknown poly strings), and I'd say it was more on the muted side like my new vcore 95, so I'm wondering if there's something wrong with the used one I bought. It's in near new condition (9.5/10) and the previous owner only played with it for one session. Any insights would be appreciated.
 
Torps

Torps

Semi-Pro
ajlee0929 said:
I just bought a new vcore 95 (poly tour rev 16L at 53 lbs) and it feels much more muted than my vcore 95 that I bought used (lynx tour at 50 lbs, but tension probably dropped as I don't know how long ago it was strung). The used one gives a much more pronounced "tinging" sound/feel and I can sense the vibrations lingering in my hands a lot more.

Does anybody know if this difference is due to the racquet (inconsistent quality/build) or the strings? Or any other factors? I demoed a vcore 95 before (unknown poly strings), and I'd say it was more on the muted side like my new vcore 95, so I'm wondering if there's something wrong with the used one I bought. It's in near new condition (9.5/10) and the previous owner only played with it for one session. Any insights would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Poly tour rev is more muted especially compared to Lynx tour
 
Aestheticsaboveallelse

Aestheticsaboveallelse

Legend
ajlee0929 said:
I just bought a new vcore 95 (poly tour rev 16L at 53 lbs) and it feels much more muted than my vcore 95 that I bought used (lynx tour at 50 lbs, but tension probably dropped as I don't know how long ago it was strung). The used one gives a much more pronounced "tinging" sound/feel and I can sense the vibrations lingering in my hands a lot more.

Does anybody know if this difference is due to the racquet (inconsistent quality/build) or the strings? Or any other factors? I demoed a vcore 95 before (unknown poly strings), and I'd say it was more on the muted side like my new vcore 95, so I'm wondering if there's something wrong with the used one I bought. It's in near new condition (9.5/10) and the previous owner only played with it for one session. Any insights would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
2021 vcores are muted and rev is quite a muted string lynx tour isn't. The tinging and vibrations could be cause way lower tension maybe
 
Anton

Anton

Legend
I've measured out my VCORE 95's and was really surprised by the specs.

11.71oz (with 1.5g on V, overgrip and rubber band) 8hl, 317SW 13TW
11.77oz (same setup but thicker cross string) 8hl 319SW 13TW

Never thought I could play with something so light, this definetly loads up and has stability of much higher SW rackets. My range guess would be 325-335
 
Last edited:
bobeeto

bobeeto

Professional
Hi this is a long shot, but the head guard busted on me today,
Does anyone have grommets for sale in the US?? Please!!:cry:
 
A

AA7

Hall of Fame
Anton said:
I've measured out my VCORE 95's and was really surprised by the specs.

11.71oz (with 1.5g on V, overgrip and rubber band) 8hl, 317SW 13TW
11.77oz (same setup but thicker cross string) 8hl 319SW 13TW

Never thought I could play with something so light, this definetly loads up and has stability of much higher SW rackets. My range guess would be 325-335
Click to expand...
yeah this is truly a fantastic racket. I preferred ez98 just a tad more b/c of its slightly more ease of use on defense due to its slightly more free power.. But other than that, they are very similar in spirit. I notice zero difference in sweetspot or real estate wise vs ez98. vc95 definitely plays very generously. I think on the control front, they are pretty much the same. it does help that my ez98 is weighted up similar to vc95 with weight on handle etc... I also prefer the feel of ez98 a bit better. But yeah vc95 punches way above its weight in stability, power, ease of use...etc...
 
S

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
Got a hit with my new VC95 today (leaded up to SW328). This thing swings fast. Its muted, but more on the 'crisp' side compared to say the Babolat Pure Strike (which has a 'i'm dead inside' complete lack of feeling). I still prefer my Ultra Pros after the first hit, but I'll put it through its paces. I think for now its earned a place in the bag next the Ultra Pros and PT2.0

I've always enjoyed Yonex Frames. The VCore Pro line was too muted and low powered for me, but admittedly I never leaded those up (I didn't have my SW1 at the time).
 
naturalexponent

naturalexponent

Hall of Fame
Soundbyte said:
Got a hit with my new VC95 today (leaded up to SW328). This thing swings fast. Its muted, but more on the 'crisp' side compared to say the Babolat Pure Strike (which has a 'i'm dead inside' complete lack of feeling). I still prefer my Ultra Pros after the first hit, but I'll put it through its paces. I think for now its earned a place in the bag next the Ultra Pros and PT2.0

I've always enjoyed Yonex Frames. The VCore Pro line was too muted and low powered for me, but admittedly I never leaded those up (I didn't have my SW1 at the time).
Click to expand...
If you haven't already, try the 97H when you have a chance! To me it's perfectly balanced between feel and comfort. Love the description of the Pure Strike lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bal
C

CornelMc

New User
Hi guys! Noobie here, needing some advice please :)

1. Would an intermediate club player with mostly flat shots, but looking into playing with more spin be able to use the vcore 95 effectively?
2. I want to try a string setup WC Red Ghost 1.18 mains + MSV Co Focus 1.18 crosses. What do you think of this setup in term of performance, in the vcore 95? Also, would the racket and this string setup (softer polys, thing gauge) be friendly for my elbow?
3. What string tension do you recommend for the string setup above? I am thinking 23 kg mains, 22 kg crosses (I always consider the big drop in tension after 24 h, and first hits with the racket).

Thanks!
 
Anton

Anton

Legend
CornelMc said:
Hi guys! Noobie here, needing some advice please :)

1. Would an intermediate club player with mostly flat shots, but looking into playing with more spin be able to use the vcore 95 effectively?
2. I want to try a string setup WC Red Ghost 1.18 mains + MSV Co Focus 1.18 crosses. What do you think of this setup in term of performance, in the vcore 95? Also, would the racket and this string setup (softer polys, thing gauge) be friendly for my elbow?
3. What string tension do you recommend for the string setup above? I am thinking 23 kg mains, 22 kg crosses (I always consider the big drop in tension after 24 h, and first hits with the racket).

Thanks!
Click to expand...

Should work well.

If playes too loopy you can go 1.25 main / 1.18 cross next time

Strongly recommend trying a bit of lead on V-throat.
 
S

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
I've decided to sell mine (L3). I like it, but it doesnt compare with my Ultra Pro's that I've switched too. Had I discovered this frame last year when I was using the Technifibre RS 305, I have no doubt I would have switched to it.
 
flanker2000fr

flanker2000fr

Hall of Fame
CornelMc said:
Hi guys! Noobie here, needing some advice please :)

1. Would an intermediate club player with mostly flat shots, but looking into playing with more spin be able to use the vcore 95 effectively?
2. I want to try a string setup WC Red Ghost 1.18 mains + MSV Co Focus 1.18 crosses. What do you think of this setup in term of performance, in the vcore 95? Also, would the racket and this string setup (softer polys, thing gauge) be friendly for my elbow?
3. What string tension do you recommend for the string setup above? I am thinking 23 kg mains, 22 kg crosses (I always consider the big drop in tension after 24 h, and first hits with the racket).

Thanks!
Click to expand...

Honestly, any 95 sq. in. with a tight string pattern is a demanding frame. I think an intermediate club player will be happier with the Vcore 98 or the Ezone 98. Both great frames.
 
D

DariaGT

Professional
flanker2000fr said:
Why on earth would they do this, when there's the Vcore 98 designed especially to this end (slightly bigger head, 16x19 pattern)?
Click to expand...

flanker2000fr said:
Honestly, any 95 sq. in. with a tight string pattern is a demanding frame. I think an intermediate club player will be happier with the Vcore 98 or the Ezone 98. Both great frames.
Click to expand...

You answered the question on your second post, that with its tight pattern is a demanding frame unless you have very accurate clean strokes
The problem with the 98 is the throat area, the head size and balance just does not feel stable for most typical OHBH players using the usual eastern grips.

Unless you have a grip like Musetti, Gasquet or Daniel Brands (retired German player) the larger heads are just not as confidence building or accurate.

You can see slo mos of k90 inch Fed BH vs RF97 and there is a noticeable wobble with the 97 through the hitting path which is never an issue with an extra hand
on larger frames even 107 inch Agassi setups etc. Fed with the 90 inch head hit through his BHs with the head seeming locked on rails vs the 97.

Even FHs the tight pattern vcore95 often go out by a few inches instead of dipping in at the last second. Launch angle is also so low the net gets in the way.
Choice of string is very cut throat for this frame where the TFight 305 RS with its more control oriented 18x19 string pattern pips the vcore95 in the spin department.
 
T

Trip

Hall of Fame
DariaGT said:
Unless you have a grip like Musetti, Gasquet or Daniel Brands (retired German player) the larger heads are just not as confidence building or accurate.
Click to expand...
That's a slippery slope my friend. Confidence-building can come in the form of many things, not least of which is simply being able to get enough string bed on the ball, with any shot, let alone the one hander. Ask Federer how that worked out when switching from the 90 to the 97 and I think he'd tell you he's glad he did, as are most of us with one-handers who have moved up in head size to upper mid-pluses. I personally have gone from the VC95 (of which I'm intimately familiar, having played the SV, the '18 and '21) to the 99" Auxetic Prestige MP-L, and, customized to equivalent spec, the MP-L is the superior stick for me (and a lot of other one-handers) for basically everything -- it's more laterally stable, has a way more consistent string bed, especially outside the sweet spot, much better feel and a more predictable flex profile. The major confidence build is the level of consistency it affords with taking one-handers early, against spin, jammed and/or at odd angles, and being able to much more consistently reply with a pacey-enough, spinny-enough, deep enough ball to stay in the rally. That comes from all the qualities I listed above, chief among them a racquet face which is large enough to afford the ability to do so. Yes, control may not be quite as telepathic when you get ahold of the sweet spot, but if your level is much below a semi-pro, good luck doing that with the VC95 on incoming balls loaded with spin, depth and/or angled pace.

I mentioned all that not to bring down the VC95, as it's clearly superior for certain other things, and still an excellent frame, but more so to say that certain absolutes, as obvious as they may seem to one person, don't necessary frame a narrative for everyone. I certainly know that the Prestige MP-L is most definitely not the frame for many players, especially truly higher-level OHBH players looking for certain qualities of a smaller head, and/or anyone who wants a more new-school frame or one whose head shape isn't as excessively narrow/elongated. But just going smaller-head is not necessarily the answer all the time, VC95 included.
 
D

DariaGT

Professional
You have basically said exactly the issue with the vc95 aka no "telepathic control"
which is less of an issue with 16 x 19 narrow/elongated frames like the larger TF 305RS and the smaller Head prestige 93 and 95 with narrower throats.

Federer rarely hit bang in the middle as Stan does on the OHBH and yet Wawa does it with his 16 x 20 D95 which is a narrow/elongated but heavy specs
that only he can swing proficiently day in day out. You might lean to staying in the points as you age by having a larger sweetspot but I dont see it that way
as Ive seen 80+ year olds with 80 inch logs hit the ball dead center from receiving younger modern player shots during doubles.

Sure many might find the larger heads more forgiving but that telepathic control and accuracy....nothing comes close to it.
It is a dilemma as I have a western grip FH that works better with a 100sq inch APD but more traditional player frames of the past like an RD-7 and RD-8,
Mizuno Lendl 90, K90, prestige 93, Kneissl white star and narrow throat willys before the PS85 just allow you to crush the BH anywhere with so much more authority
and confidence that any modern frames its like night and day.
 
flanker2000fr

flanker2000fr

Hall of Fame
DariaGT said:
You answered the question on your second post, that with its tight pattern is a demanding frame unless you have very accurate clean strokes
The problem with the 98 is the throat area, the head size and balance just does not feel stable for most typical OHBH players using the usual eastern grips.

Unless you have a grip like Musetti, Gasquet or Daniel Brands (retired German player) the larger heads are just not as confidence building or accurate.

You can see slo mos of k90 inch Fed BH vs RF97 and there is a noticeable wobble with the 97 through the hitting path which is never an issue with an extra hand
on larger frames even 107 inch Agassi setups etc. Fed with the 90 inch head hit through his BHs with the head seeming locked on rails vs the 97.

Even FHs the tight pattern vcore95 often go out by a few inches instead of dipping in at the last second. Launch angle is also so low the net gets in the way.
Choice of string is very cut throat for this frame where the TFight 305 RS with its more control oriented 18x19 string pattern pips the vcore95 in the spin department.
Click to expand...

Agree about a tighter pattern being more demanding, but this argument about stability on the OHBH doesn't make sense as the 95 has a lower twist weight (which is a measure of torsional stability) than the 98. In general, all things equal, a racquet with the larger headsize has a higher twist weight than its equivalent with a smaller headsize.

The problem with larger headsizes is that this increased twist weight comes at the expense of manoeuvrability, and this is particularly an issue on the OHBH. It's obviously not as much of an issue on the 2HBH as a) the motion is less complex and b) the second hand helps steer the racquet.

I also don't understand this argument that the ball either flies long or catches the net. Which is it? If the launch angle is very low, that should translate into a shorter ball, not one that consistently sails long. I've played an Angell TC95 16x19 with a super open string pattern, and while I got a lot of net clearance, it's easy to overshoot in length unless putting a lot of spin on the ball. Conversely, I am currently playing a TC95 or TC97 18x20, and while the clearance over the net has decreased, translating in more mistakes in the tape, the ball rarely sails long unless my footwork and technique get horribly wrong. But then it's not the racquet / string bed's fault.
 
Last edited:
D

DariaGT

Professional
flanker2000fr said:
Agree about a tighter pattern being more demanding, but this argument about stability on the OHBH doesn't make sense as the 95 has a lower twist weight (which is a measure of torsional stability) than the 98. In general, all things equal, a racquet with the larger headsize has a higher twist weight than its equivalent with a smaller headsize.

The problem with larger headsizes is that this increased twist weight comes at the expense of manoeuvrability, and this is particularly an issue on the OHBH. It's obviously not as much of an issue on the 2HBH as a) the motion is less complex and b) the second hand helps steer the racquet.
Click to expand...

Correct the higher twistweight is what RF wobble vids revealed using the 97. I think the vc95 is the perfect OHBH racquet just would like a little more spin as the pop is insane unlike any 95 more like an extreme 100 but due to its tight pattern it can never match the extreme except for balance due to lower twistweight.

flanker2000fr said:
I also don't understand this argument that the ball either flies long or catches the net. Which is it? If the launch angle is very low, that should translate into a shorter ball, not one that consistently sails long. I've played an Angell TC95 16x19 with a super open string pattern, and while I get a lot of net clearance, it's easy to overshoot in length unless putting a lot of spin on the ball. Conversely, I am currently playing a TC95 or TC97 18x20, and while the clearance over the net has decreased, translating in more mistakes in the tape, the ball rarely sails long unless my footwork and technique get horribly wrong. But then it's not the racquet / string bed's fault.
Click to expand...
Yep as stated above the VC95 has more pop than most 95, even Shapo said this over the ps 6.1 yet 6.1 has the 18x20 which Evans murders OHBH topspin passing shots with.
I can go home happier swinging a 6.1 95 18x 20 on a daily basis than left frustrated with the vc95 which has that massive pop yet live by the sword results.
The Prestige tour 95 and few years earlier 93 models with 16 x 19 are just sublime for OHBHs. My CX200 98 is not far from the Angell TC95 but overshooting the balls with
the tc95 16 x 19 is easy if you dont have the right strings. Which strings did you use for the 16 x 19 Angell? I hit better OHBHs with a 6.1 18 x 20 with MSV Focus Hex Soft 17L @ 48lbs
 
Last edited:
A

aaron_h27

Hall of Fame
I don't think people realize how much string pattern can make a difference. Djokovic went from 18x20 to 18x19 and reduced his SW by 10 points. I think 16x19 or even 16x18 would make sense for a 95 to be comparable in power level to other modern rackets.

I still wish I had my VC95's so I could string it up as a 16x18 and try it out :D maybe I'll try it with my SV95 lol
 
Classic-TXP-IG MID

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
DariaGT said:
Even FHs the tight pattern vcore95 often go out by a few inches instead of dipping in at the last second. Launch angle is also so low the net gets in the way.
Click to expand...

Not my experience. I got plenty of spin and a great/higher launch angle on both my FH and OHBH with this racquet. The ball dipped very effectively, had lots of kick post-bounce, or was flat and penetrating (depending on the amount of spin imparted and the amount of RHS used). The key may lie in the tension the racquet was strung at, the differential in tension between the Mains and Crosses (with Crosses being looser/lower tension), and stroke mechanics/technique and RHS.

I could also time my OHBH very well, hit against pace, and deal with incoming/oncoming spin and weight-of-shot quite effectively... as long as I was in place, and got behind my shot/strokes and planted my feet (which is more of a fitness/footwork thing than a head size issue).

Do you have to work less hard with a larger head size racquet... no doubt... but you still need to be there in time, get yourself set, and be meeting the ball at the right point. If that doesn't happen, it won't matter what the head size is or what strings you are using... the shot won't come off well.
 
D

DariaGT

Professional
aaron_h27 said:
I don't think people realize how much string pattern can make a difference. Djokovic went from 18x20 to 18x19 and reduced his SW by 10 points. I think 16x19 or even 16x18 would make sense for a 95 to be comparable in power level to other modern rackets.

I still wish I had my VC95's so I could string it up as a 16x18 and try it out :D maybe I'll try it with my SV95 lol
Click to expand...
I found the VC Sv95 to be a monster plays close to a pure aero VS 98 but easier for OHBH and less harshness
if it had 16 x 18 Im sure it would still have more control than DeMinaur 16 x 18 99inch stick as long as it is not the
16x18 version of the 6.1 which was horribly tapered big spaces top and bottom totally unlike todays even tapered efforts.
 
Y

Yamin

Hall of Fame
I had been wanting to try this racket for a while but didn't like it... Something about the weight distribution makes it pretty awful for Western or further grip. It turns over weird, and wristy movements aren't linear. Didn't work for my one hand backhand at all, but I have a more extreme grip on that side as well.

Power level definitely not low though, and it hit powerful flat serves. I imagine anyone who hits through the ball should have no complaints about power.
 
S

Soundbyte

Hall of Fame
$12 delivery to the US too. I would have jumped on this months ago...but must continue to resist additional racket purchases!!! I've ordered soccer gear from them to the US in the past. Good stuff
robertg06 said:
Heads up to any UK VC95 users... Pro (filler to not get censored) Direct have L3/L4 for £49. Some 98s and 100s for same price too.
Click to expand...
 
mattimag

mattimag

Rookie
robertg06 said:
No probs! Crazy stuff. They also have some Vcore Pros for similar prices. Never seen anything like it.
Click to expand...

Yes I purchased a vcore 95 for me and a vcore pro 100 for my girlfriend. Amazing prices. Some great prices also on some shoes and racket bags. Here I am hoping they don't cancel my order !!
 
Vicious49

Vicious49

Legend
robertg06 said:
Heads up to any UK VC95 users... Pro (filler to not get censored) Direct have L3/L4 for £49. Some 98s and 100s for same price too.
Click to expand...
Soundbyte said:
$12 delivery to the US too. I would have jumped on this months ago...but must continue to resist additional racket purchases!!! I've ordered soccer gear from them to the US in the past. Good stuff
Click to expand...

I must be going to the wrong site because I dont see those frames there. Probably better that way.
 
Vicious49

Vicious49

Legend
naturalexponent said:
Interesting but probably a minority opinion in these parts. Even when I had mine strung with full multi I never found it lacking control. I think the lack of mass leaves a little to be desired if you live at the net but between power and control it's typically not control that the frame is lacking.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Its not quite UT level but I was able to hot my targets with it pretty consistently.
 
mattimag

mattimag

Rookie
Hey guys, it seems order is confirmed so I am planning my next moves.
What are recommended strings and setup for Vcore95? Do I have to add some lead?
For reference I am playing with Tecnifibre 315 limited 16x19 with 4g of lead at 12 o'clock

I know polytour rev and strike are the best strings for this. Is there something else, maybe less expensive?
 
Last edited:
W

Wilsonbro

Semi-Pro
so i took out the 97 D. i was able to hit through the ball more and has more control oblivious. lacks spin the 95 has control but ball will tend to fly. the stick had cycolne in it. i like the 97 d but it just to heavy
 
R

robertg06

Professional
mattimag said:
Hey guys, it seems order is confirmed so I am planning my next moves.
What are recommended strings and setup for Vcore95? Do I have to add some lead?
For reference I am playing with Tecnifibre 315 limited 16x19 with 4g of lead at 12 o'clock

I know polytour rev and strike are the best strings for this. Is there something else, maybe less expensive?
Click to expand...

Some general thoughts after ~ 2 years with this thing trying a bunch of different weight / string combinations:
  • With heavier strings (e.g. Poly Tour Strike 1.25, Volkl Cyclone Tour 1.35), it's perfectly playable stock
  • With lighter strings (I had 5-10g differences at times between strings and gauges), it can be 'too' headlight and also lack power
  • Across different strings (whether crisp polys like PTS or softer ones like VCT) I have always preferred low tension
  • Although many recommend a differential between mains and crosses, this can noticeably deform / slightly shorten this racket
  • If you have more modern strokes or want to maximise power on serve, some weight at 12 and/or 10&2 can help
  • If you have flatter strokes or volley a lot, some weight at 3&9 or 10&2 can help increase twist-weight and reduce its fluttering
  • Because it's so fast through the air, adding weight doesn't really slow it down at all
Some more specific (and personal) thoughts:
  • I kept going back to Poly Tour Strike before realising it was much heavier than other strings I was trying, and realising it increased SW
    • It's a really dead string otherwise, overly expensive, and the racket is already muted
  • Poly Tour Rev had two different outings and felt pretty good but lacked anything especially noticeable (also too expensive)
  • Of the Yonex strings (I basically tried them all), Poly Tour Fire (1.25 full-bed or 1.2 in crosses) was the big surprise, but it falls off quickly due to the coating
  • I really liked hybrids between a shaped poly main and a slick poly cross in this frame, but found they didn't last long
  • I've always used leather grips and had a Kimony on this at first but it's already headlight enough and any weight in the handle can push it over the edge
I eventually 'settled' on playing it stock (or with a bit of lead at 12) with VCT 1.35 (highly recommend, very unique string that lasts weirdly long) at 40lbs ish

Hope that's helpful in some way!
 
Last edited:
bobeeto

bobeeto

Professional
I think dude above me posted super well about this, I am also playing it with a leather grip and poly tour rev in one, and a multi/sharp poly cross in the other.
It’s mainly fast indoor court for me, so I don’t add any weight - but when we travel to outdoor courts and warmer weather i add about 4 grams lead at 3/9. Mainly cause the leather grip but also it’s fine without Lead assuming you strike clean through the ball
 
mattimag

mattimag

Rookie
robertg06 said:
Some general thoughts after ~ 2 years with this thing trying a bunch of different weight / string combinations:
  • With heavier strings (e.g. Poly Tour Strike 1.25, Volkl Cyclone Tour 1.35), it's perfectly playable stock
  • With lighter strings (I had 5-10g differences at times between strings and gauges), it can be 'too' headlight and also lack power
  • Across different strings (whether crisp polys like PTS or softer ones like VCT) I have always preferred low tension
  • Although many recommend a differential between mains and crosses, this can noticeably deform / slightly shorten this racket
  • If you have more modern strokes or want to maximise power on serve, some weight at 12 and/or 10&2 can help
  • If you have flatter strokes or volley a lot, some weight at 3&9 or 10&2 can help increase twist-weight and reduce its fluttering
  • Because it's so fast through the air, adding weight doesn't really slow it down at all
Some more specific (and personal) thoughts:
  • I kept going back to Poly Tour Strike before realising it was much heavier than other strings I was trying, and realising it increased SW
    • It's a really dead string otherwise, overly expensive, and the racket is already muted
  • Poly Tour Rev had two different outings and felt pretty good but lacked anything especially noticeable (also too expensive)
  • Of the Yonex strings (I basically tried them all), Poly Tour Fire (1.25 full-bed or 1.2 in crosses) was the big surprise, but it falls off quickly due to the coating
  • I really liked hybrids between a shaped poly main and a slick poly cross in this frame, but found they didn't last long
  • I've always used leather grips and had a Kimony on this at first but it's already headlight enough and any weight in the handle can push it over the edge
I eventually 'settled' on playing it stock (or with a bit of lead at 12) with VCT 1.35 (highly recommend, very unique string that lasts weirdly long) at 40lbs ish

Hope that's helpful in some way!
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for the feedback.
I have these sets of strings at the moment. Which one do you think it will be better to use?
-tourna big hitter silver 1.25
-tourna silver 7 tour 1.25
-tecbifibre ice code 1.25
-luxilon 4g 1.30
-head lynx tour 1.25
-luxilon big banger original 1.30

I play OHBH and attacking baseliner
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Yonex Vcore Tour G 310 vs Vcore 95 (2021 red/blue version)
Replies
0
Views
703
prolord89
P
pico
Vcore 95 - backhand slice help!
Replies
38
Views
3K
ZZdark
Z
B
Vcore 95 (2021) setup
Replies
8
Views
1K
Bal
B
B
Vcore 95 Iterations
Replies
36
Views
3K
bobeeto
bobeeto
M
New mid stick
Replies
6
Views
1K
purple-n-gold
P
Top