what? who are they? For a real perspective on pros hit.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjFfuXMG0Rg
The big sound they make when they hit the ball make it look like they hitting bombs, but thats the regular sound when playing indoors.
I agree. Whenever I watch indoor tennis I turn the sound off. You can't even really see the ball with the camera behind the net the way it is. They are hitting hard but nothing extraordinary.
I agree. Whenever I watch indoor tennis I turn the sound off. You can't even really see the ball with the camera behind the net the way it is. They are hitting hard but nothing extraordinary.
A couple months ago I watched a match between a guy who was roughly 250 on ATP tour against a guy who rose as high as 199 2.5 years ago but chose to coach instead of staying on the tour. It was a well played, close, 3 set match.
It reminded me of my last visit to Saddlebrook where our instructor and another student were both former ~300 ATP players in their late 20s/early 30s. (At age 41) I was lucky to stay in a rally with that student for more than 4 balls and they would have 20 or 40 shot long rallies against each other.
Observe how much of it is anticipation, footwork, preparation and rally balls to construct the point to their advantage. Watch how quickly they can switch from defense to neutral or offense. Most importantly recognize how seldom they actually hit the ball to generate full power. When they do they'll often nail it.
IMO most low level amateurs tend to fixate too much on generating power and winners. Great - you might win a battle but are likely to lose the war. Pros focus on winning enough strategic battles to win the war and use the best tools suited to the task to do so.
K_I
IMO most low level amateurs tend to fixate too much on generating power and winners. Great - you might win a battle but are likely to lose the war. Pros focus on winning enough strategic battles to win the war and use the best tools suited to the task to do so.
You mean low level amateur young men. Women will happily dink the ball back all day long. Of the two approaches honestly i feel the power way is better.
If your hitting the ball way out and long you can tweak your swing so you can bring the ball down with more topspin. But if your dinking the ball around your not going to suddenly develop any power. I agree that going for winners can be a problem though for the guys though.
You can win alot of points just hitting a quality shot back..
Don't be genorous. 3.0 tops3.5's.......
3.5's.......
3.5's.......
You forgot the "at best..."
3.5's.......
what? who are they? For a real perspective on pros hit.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjFfuXMG0Rg
120 MPH
3.5's.......
That's clay court tennis.a bit annoying actually. compared to the first two, they really arent doing anything other than aggressively spinning the ball in.
Thought they were pretty much playing text book clay court tennis, try to push the opponent back, hit drop shots, etc.'course, the slowness very well could be b/c it's on clay. but they don't even look like they're constructing points, just hitting it around really.
6 words(people that would simply baggel us)
a bit annoying actually. compared to the first two, they really arent doing anything other than aggressively spinning the ball in. not to mention the grunting over and over and over. 'course, the slowness very well could be b/c it's on clay. but they don't even look like they're constructing points, just hitting it around really.
you can see the differences even in world class players, i guess.
What I think of a pro is that any mistake means the point is over... Even on clay now.