FlashFlare11
Hall of Fame
Guys, what happened to RafaWon2012?
Nadal must have been injured
Federer became the second player to defeat Nadal 10 times.
Interesting fact. And an 18-10 isn't what I call ownage, which many fans like to throw it around. It's not like Fed's record against Roddick.
nadalwon2012 just got PWNED!
Maybe Fed lost a little game, but gained some wisdom.?Nope. What happened is that 4 years past his prime Federer finally figured out peak Nadal.
Thank you federer for restoring my faith in this rivalry. I now look forward to Fedal matches. No longer is it a man vs a boy. This rivalry is now 2 adults. The real deal.
I never even said Federer couldn't beat Nadal. You clowns sure are obsessed with me. Just wow at my domination of some people. And my post regarding the final-
Actually he never tweeted that. I would go check again.
With your severly unbiased perspective and a foretelling name, it would be crazy to expect people not to get enamored by you....... So how are you today ma'am?
Somebody quoted Cahill saying that. It must have been on the air or somewhere apart from twitter. I just assumed it was twitter, because there I saw him tweeting a lot just before the final, regarding the weather.
Cahill did say before the match (on air) that if Fed does not beat Nadal today, his season could be in trouble -- he did not mention anything about "today's conditions". In any case, I never got it why Fed's whole season would depend on the outcome of this one match.
Federer has whooped Nadal plenty over the years. Not a surprise to see it this week. Not as lopsided as the world tour finals. Cahill said it best when he tweeted 'if Fed can't beat Nadal in today's conditions, then he's screwed for the year'.
Ok.
If that's the case, doesn't make a lot of sense. Federer has won 16 slams while only winning 2 of 8 slam meetings. Doesn't seem to matter if Nadal has the edge over Federer, in terms of overall success. I just thought the quote mentioned something about the conditions, but either way, its over.
Somebody quoted Cahill saying that. It must have been on the air or somewhere apart from twitter. I just assumed it was twitter, because there I saw him tweeting a lot just before the final, regarding the weather.
Hilarious. Wasn't Nadal supposed to put Djokovic to a test today? According to your own words.
I know that you said that rommil's theory should be put to test. But those words have the same meaning, because they meant, that Nadal and Djokovic will meet at the final today. So, there.
Hahaha. Please, stop embarrasing yourself. I actuallly am starting to feel for you. Such a confused mind.
Man, Cahill basically saying if Fed doesn't win cause of the damp conditions he's fudged for the rest of the year, come on now thats crazy
I never even said Federer couldn't beat Nadal. You clowns sure are obsessed with me. Just wow at my domination of some people. And my post regarding the final-
Somebody quoted Cahill saying that. It must have been on the air or somewhere apart from twitter. I just assumed it was twitter, because there I saw him tweeting a lot just before the final, regarding the weather.
the only thing you dominate is HOW TO MAKE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A FOOL!
now you post lies, then you backpedal about your lies?
Darren Cahill
"Spitting rain again. *#@*"
Cahill said it might be cancelled, but it's not 100% certain yet.
Darren Tweet
"Light rain has cleared again. Crowd filtering in. Players walking out at 5.15pm PT. Let's go. ESPN Classic & ESPN3 live. Rafa v Roger"
http://twitter.com/#!/darren_cahill
yes looks like it's really close, crowd coming, and players soon to come out
Man, Cahill basically saying if Fed doesn't win cause of the damp conditions he's fudged for the rest of the year, come on now thats crazy
Of course, if Nadal met Djokovic. He didn't. Nadal has been improving vs Djokovic of late, so I am well within my rights to suggest Nadal will put Djokovic to the test. I only mentioned it being at Indian Wells because that is/was the next available opportunity. Either way, I don't think I hurt anyone's feelings. At least I'm not predicting scores. There is a thread on general board now where posters are predicting the score of the Isner-Federer final.
Of course, if Nadal met Djokovic. He didn't. Nadal has been improving vs Djokovic of late, so I am well within my rights to suggest Nadal will put Djokovic to the test. I only mentioned it being at Indian Wells because that is/was the next available opportunity. Either way, I don't think I hurt anyone's feelings. At least I'm not predicting scores. There is a thread on general board now where posters are predicting the score of the Isner-Federer final.
the only thing you dominate is HOW TO MAKE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A FOOL!
now you post lies, then you backpedal about your lies?
How is Nadal improving vs Djokovic? He lost in the AO final to a listless and tired Novak. Nole just has way more of a complete aggressive and defensive game than Nadal. Nadal cant come close to matching the aggressive but consistent game nole plays. And the dampness last night may have helped fed, but the wind should have been a big plus for Rafa as it would have slowed down Fed's serve and fh.
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=417183&page=18
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=417183&page=20
And there was also this, which was said on the air-
Son, let me make it clear to you, since you do not make any sense at all.
When you expect Nadal to put Djokovic to a test (your words) at the IW final you also expect him to beat Federer, in order to reach that final. Are you still with me? Good. Two days later you say, that you are not surprised to see Federer beating Nadal. (Something, that not only you, but also quite reasonable posters on this board and dedicated Federer or Nadal fans failed to foresee.). Those two opinions of yours are inconsequent. They contradict each other.
10feelsorryforyous
oh Honey... you can post how many links you wish. YOU QUOTED DARREN CAHILL to have tweeted something he did not. therefore you are LYING!
Darren Cahill
"Spitting rain again. *#@*"
Cahill said it might be cancelled, but it's not 100% certain yet.
Darren Tweet
"Light rain has cleared again. Crowd filtering in. Players walking out at 5.15pm PT. Let's go. ESPN Classic & ESPN3 live. Rafa v Roger"
http://twitter.com/#!/darren_cahill
yes looks like it's really close, crowd coming, and players soon to come out
Man, Cahill basically saying if Fed doesn't win cause of the damp conditions he's fudged for the rest of the year, come on now thats crazy
I remembered what Cahill said, as my previous post confirms. I just did not realize it was from his 'on the air work', rather that his twitter account. I never lied. But whatever helps you sleep at night.....
Once again,
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=417183&page=18
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=417183&page=20
And there was also this, which was said on the air-
Because Roger simply doesn't look comfortable on court at all. Granted, Bellucci and Raonic played well, but Federer's been missing some easy shots more often.
Yes, he's been playing well, but this is his third tournament in 4 weeks, I think. He was bound to feel the effects in either IW or Miami.
So what were you saying??? Seriously great match from Roger, well done. He proved that there is no match up and to say otherwise is just plain ignorant. Also, that he is not some old man, and still in his prime.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I feel sorry for you wasting time on semantics. The fact that something I said 2 days ago is consuming your mind this much, is not my problem.
OMG DELUSIONAL ****S LOLOL.
OMG DELUSIONAL ****S LOLOL.
So dense. stupid fed worshipers.... LLOOLOOl
[centered gigantic letters]
FED IS NOT AN OLD MAN BECASUE HE JUST WON A MATCH. PROVEN
ps: there... we just did a Jackson pile post template
Federer winning seems to make you guys upset. Strange, very strange. I'm a Nadal fan and I'm the only happy poster on this page...
Because all of their poorly formed arguments have complete deteriorated.
This proves that there is not match up issue and that Federer is not over the hill, the guy was a late bloomer.
Because all of their poorly formed arguments have complete deteriorated. This proves that there is not match up issue and that Federer is not over the hill, the guy was a late bloomer.
I feel sorry for you wasting time on semantics. The fact that something I said 2 days ago is consuming your mind this much, is not my problem.
Because all of their poorly formed arguments have complete deteriorated. This proves that there is not match up issue and that Federer is not over the hill, the guy was a late bloomer.
You lost it completely, son.
I guess it's because he just realized he got his nickname wrong. He must have been aiming for nadalwonsquat2012... :mrgreen: