VPhuc tennis fan
Professional
You ARE brave!No its fine the Devil doesnt have a church
Hope you're right. Watch your back though!
You ARE brave!No its fine the Devil doesnt have a church
Just read posts #32, 37, 38, and 48 in this very same thread.
To witness TDK greatness in eloquence! How he would flip-flop between the few posts.
Just give him enough rope to hang himself, would you?
Have mercy on his T DARK K soul!
You ARE brave!
Hope you're right. Watch your back though!
I assume you're talking about the 1980 Wimbledon final? It's a good match, but I actually prefer the previous year's final between Borg and Tanner. Tanner's performance is one of the best in a major final for an eventual loser.
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."
Now claiming the Borg-McEnroe game exciting. Didn't it happen before 03-06?
Hard to keep up straight with all your arguments when you spew things out from both sides of your mouth, isn't it?
BTW, in response to your comment in post #18, here what I wrote, "Your comment showed us the TREMENDOUS DEPTH of your knowledge about tennis."
I have NOT changed my opinion yet.
And Federer would be on 20+ if not for NadalNadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."
Now claiming the Borg-McEnroe game exciting. Didn't it happen before 03-06?
Hard to keep up straight with all your arguments when you spew things out from both sides of your mouth, isn't it?
BTW, in response to your comment in post #18, here what I wrote, "Your comment showed us the TREMENDOUS DEPTH of your knowledge about tennis."
I have NOT changed my opinion yet.
TDK said:Yes ....Borg and McEnroe did not play from 2003-2006.
I never said "Before" 2003.
You really make me look good
V Phuck
Actually I have another analogy .....
You make me look good for the same reason Fed looked so good From 2003-2006:
NO COMPETITION.
fed looked that good because he was blasting everyone off the court but your not even close to doing the same
Wow, I see that now you're past boasting about Rafa's stuff.Have you actually read Phucks posts? I think I have blasted him off the court.
Good point.No its fine the Devil doesnt have a church
No its fine the Devil doesnt have a church
You mean under the lights when he served so hard that he literally broke the net chord? Yeah thy was great....
But I'm talking about finals......there's no bigger stage than a Wimbledon final .
I'm talking about the 1979 Wimbledon final. Borg beat Tanner 6-7, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3, 6-4. Tanner played a fantastic match and really had Borg on the ropes. Even when Borg got the early break in the fifth set, Tanner was breathing down Borg's neck in threatening to break back, but Borg managed to hold on, just, and finally won the title.
The match under the lights where Tanner broke the net with his serve was a quarter final of the 1979 US Open, in which Tanner beat Borg 6-2, 4-6, 6-2, 7-6. Tanner was serving for the match at 5-3 in the fourth set at deuce, when the net came down. When they eventually repaired the net, Borg broke Tanner's serve and it ended up going to a tiebreak, which Tanner won.
se post #118. Better let the Devil sleep now that Rafa is gone.Yep and they have a website here
You're the STGOAT.
Now that Rafa is out of Wimby, what are you going to do?Hey Phuck
I miss you .
Your from the weak era . I'm gonna look like a goat.