2012 WTA CHAMPIONSHIPS - Istanbul

WTA Championships Champion?


  • Total voters
    44
  • Poll closed .

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
Was a good shot for sure. She can very rarely hit winners though since she lacks the power to do so.

I mean, sure. But at least acknowledge that she forces a lot of errors. It isn't all pure Woz-like pushing. She mixes it up to frustrate her opponent.
 

romeo8880

G.O.A.T.
I mean, sure. But at least acknowledge that she forces a lot of errors. It isn't all pure Woz-like pushing. She mixes it up to frustrate her opponent.



She does, I just don't like her style that's all. Seems like she just rarely goes for her shots.
 

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
Can't discuss tennis with you then if you can't see Radwanska scrambling all over the court for 90% of the match.

I see it. But the fact that she is on the defensive against heavier hitters most of the time doesn't mean that she doesn't go for winners when she has the opportunity. She comes to net more than most, hits angles etc. The fact that the point in question was won on a Radwanska winner at net is very relevant when you try to characterize the point as her "waiting for an error."
 

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
PS - Wouldn't it be silly to go for winners from the defensive positions that Aga is typically in against Sharapova/Serena? I mean, how can you "wait for errors" if you are scrambling around court like a madwoman? "Waiting" connotes being in a position to go for winners but casually choosing not to.
 
Last edited:

romeo8880

G.O.A.T.
It's almost comical to watch. It's like Sharapova is playing against a little child but she can't stop making errors and the child is winning.
 

romeo8880

G.O.A.T.
Another one for you. Absolutely kicking the crap out of Radwanska on that point and ends up losing bc of an error.
 

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
Another one for you. Absolutely kicking the crap out of Radwanska on that point and ends up losing bc of an error.

How about the 30-30 point at 4-4? Worked Maria all over the court. Finishes her off with a touch shot.

Or the point after that. Overhead winner.
 

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
I can't stand Maria. Her one-dimensional play, her painful shrieking and her stanky attitude. But you don't see me criticizing her every single post.
 

romeo8880

G.O.A.T.
I can't stand Maria. Her one-dimensional play, her painful shrieking and her stanky attitude. But you don't see me criticizing her every single post.




She is a dominant player. Kicking the absolute living crap out of Radwanska. 60+ unforced errors or the match would be over 6-2, 6-1 by now.
 

Brian11785

Hall of Fame
Oh I've learned. Radwanska has sooo many grand slam titles with her style of play. Breaking records she is.

She has more wins over top players than she'd ever have playing the type of game that you favor. As I said, she doesn't push. She goes after shots (either via net approach or angle) when she gets a sitter. She can't help that she wasn't built like linebacker Serena or Amazonian Maria.
 

romeo8880

G.O.A.T.
That's because all you focus on is negativity. You don't see the positive in anybody's posts. Roger Federer is the greatest player ever. Novak Djokovic is a steroid abusing one year wonder. Let's see which one you comment on.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
tough turnaround for Kerber & Azarenka, they played 3 hours today

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Stadium (from 17.00hrs)
1. Angelique Kerber vs. Li Na
2. Victoria Azarenka vs. Serena Williams
3. Samantha Stosur vs. Sara Errani
 

iri10

Rookie
With the way they have it set up, I think 2-1 gets ranked higher than 2-0. So Stosur would only advance if she won both matches, and the 3rd/4th place players won 1 or less.
 
Top