Overdrive
Legend
You mean like this?
"I taught you well, Azarenka."
Haha.
Where did you get that picture from? Never saw that before.
You mean like this?
"I taught you well, Azarenka."
if you're not breathing because of it, then yes. :shock:
The rules are not the problem. Azarenka's gamesmanship is.
At least ESPN is finally doing the coverage right, the commentators are tearing into Azarenka for icing the opponent.
Azarenka could have lied, she could have pretty much said anything she wanted after the match about the MTO. I liked that she was so candid about it instead. She clearly didn't realize how harshly she would be judged for "over-emotionality". And she did sound genuinely rattled. The good thing about this is that this sucky rule may get re-evaluated because of it. The rule is sucky. Nothing to do with Azarenka personally. I agree with Gilbert that a player should NEVER be allowed an MTO before the opponent's serve. I've seen it tons of times and it's just not right. You should be allowed ONLY before your own serve. That makes a lot of sense to me. I don't understand why it doesn't make sense to the tennis powers . But not Azarenka's fault if something is allowed that in the eyes of many people shouldn't be. And in this particular match, Stephens could almost never hold serve (what was it? Once in each set?), so it really didn't make any difference to what was already the typical pattern. No one on earth could convince me that Stephens would have held her serve if Azarenka had not had a panic attack because she wasn't either before the panic attack but of course, in some cases, it could make a difference. There is a valid point in challenging that rule but no need to scapegoat Vika about it.
And overall, Vika was clearly the dominant player in the match.
Then why doesn't it also irrate you when Nadal does the same thing?I'm fine with the rules. It's when losers like Azarenka abuse such rules that irritates me.
So you were watching that Nadal-Petzschner match at Wimbledon, too?The rule is sucky. Nothing to do with Azarenka personally. I agree with Gilbert that a player should NEVER be allowed an MTO before the opponent's serve. I've seen it tons of times and it's just not right. You should be allowed ONLY before your own serve. That makes a lot of sense to me. I don't understand why it doesn't make sense to the tennis powers.
you nailed it... world #1 setting such a wrong example
looks like she got the plot now -- change of story
Azarenka in press:
"I'm being really honest here. When I play and someone else takes a medical timeout, I don't doubt them."
Then why doesn't it also irrate you when Nadal does the same thing?
looks like she got the plot now -- change of story
Azarenka in press:
"I'm being really honest here. When I play and someone else takes a medical timeout, I don't doubt them."
"I shouldn't have put myself in that situation. ... I thought I was going to play through the pain. ... I should have [called a timeout] earlier."
"I was trying to make sure I could breathe. ... I'm experienced enough to know what was wrong. I just couldn't breathe. I think it was obvious that my shots were pretty different. It was stressing me out... I couldn't breathe."
"I understand the situation. I guess it was my bad. A few seconds after the match I couldn't discuss everything. I took it to the point where I couldn't breathe."
"I should of called the trainer earlier. The rib tightened up and it was impossible for me to breathe. I thought I could play through it"
Azarenka could have lied, she could have pretty much said anything she wanted after the match about the MTO. I liked that she was so candid about it instead. She clearly didn't realize how harshly she would be judged for "over-emotionality". And she did sound genuinely rattled. The good thing about this is that this sucky rule may get re-evaluated because of it. The rule is sucky. Nothing to do with Azarenka personally..
I agree with Gilbert that a player should NEVER be allowed an MTO before the opponent's serve. I've seen it tons of times and it's just not right. You should be allowed ONLY before your own serve. That makes a lot of sense to me..
I don't understand .....
Azarenka could have lied, she could have pretty much said anything she wanted after the match about the MTO. I liked that she was so candid about it instead. She clearly didn't realize how harshly she would be judged for "over-emotionality". And she did sound genuinely rattled. The good thing about this is that this sucky rule may get re-evaluated because of it. The rule is sucky. Nothing to do with Azarenka personally. I agree with Gilbert that a player should NEVER be allowed an MTO before the opponent's serve. I've seen it tons of times and it's just not right. You should be allowed ONLY before your own serve. That makes a lot of sense to me. I don't understand why it doesn't make sense to the tennis powers . But not Azarenka's fault if something is allowed that in the eyes of many people shouldn't be. And in this particular match, Stephens could almost never hold serve (what was it? Once in each set?), so it really didn't make any difference to what was already the typical pattern. No one on earth could convince me that Stephens would have held her serve if Azarenka had not had a panic attack because she wasn't either before the panic attack but of course, in some cases, it could make a difference. There is a valid point in challenging that rule but no need to scapegoat Vika about it.
And overall, Vika was clearly the dominant player in the match.
And it might affect her final if the crowd gets really against her.
Vika should have just done a Fed and taken a tactical bathroom break.
Stephens was poor in this match, very defensive and her timing was really bad, she lacked consistent timing and fluidity in her shots and she stands too far back. She has a bit of work to do. Azarenka was basically running her around as she pleased all match long. Hopefully it will be a good final.
Ah, so that's it? Er, ok.to be honest, they're probably taking this approach because stephens is an amaerican. I'm not condoning or condemning vika, just saying ESPN has a horse in this race.