AngieB
Banned
Wow. Yeah, Steffi was quite the competitor! None quicker afoot than she!steffi...
...the only person to have played and beaten all of those you just said...
AngieB
Wow. Yeah, Steffi was quite the competitor! None quicker afoot than she!steffi...
...the only person to have played and beaten all of those you just said...
Serena does take walkabouts sometimes during volatile matches that is for sure, but where is truly matters, at the GS events, she is 17-4 in grand slam singles finals.The champion I saw in Cincy was a quitter... hence her "not as mentally strong label." I never saw Martina or Chris Evert tank a game because their temper got the best of them. Serena rebounded against Li Na and won. She's good enough, or the opposition weak enough, that she can spot her opponents a game, or set, and still rebound to win. But, when speaking of GOAT, it's hurts your position when you don't live up to your potential.
Wow. Yeah, Steffi was quite the competitor! None quicker afoot than she!
AngieB
You know I dont even see the debate. The only one I see as being close to Serena is Martina. She competed across multiple eras and actually beat a young Graf in some big matches. Graf to me is the most over rated of any of them. The women played nobodies except for seles. Then seles got stabbed and she went back to playing nobodies. Serena is 17 and 4 in slam finals. Graf was 22-9. Graf actually lost to Sanchez in two grand slam finals I cant even wrap me head around that.
Just an FYI, there was a reason they named an entire United States Tennis Center after Billie Jean King. It wasn't because she was the greatest tennis player of all time. It was because she was the greatest contributor to the advancement of women's athletics and the cause of equal rights. Her contributions went far beyond the sport of tennis and much greater than winning the most tennis matches or grand slam events.Except that list was done years ago. No list would put Serena #7 today, or below someone like Billie Jean King and you know it. I would bet tons of money (and win tons of money just as I did betting on Nadal at ridiculously high odds to win the U.S Open) the lowest any list would put her is 3rd or 4th today. Some would put her 1st (deservedly or not).
she's behind graf, but #2 after that. she couldn't best an aging graf.
Just an FYI, there was a reason they named an entire United States Tennis Center after Billie Jean King. It wasn't because she was the greatest tennis player of all time. It was because she was the greatest contributor to the advancement of women's athletics and the cause of equal rights. Her contributions went far beyond the sport of tennis and much greater than winning the most tennis matches or grand slam events.
AngieB
Exactly. Greatest of all time incorporates the person as a whole, not just their tennis skills. Being a positive role model, being a goodwill ambassador to the game of tennis... giving back to tennis more than what you've taken. That's where Billie Jean scores a lot of points.
Just an FYI, there was a reason they named an entire United States Tennis Center after Billie Jean King. It wasn't because she was the greatest tennis player of all time. It was because she was the greatest contributor to the advancement of women's athletics and the cause of equal rights. Her contributions went far beyond the sport of tennis and much greater than winning the most tennis matches or grand slam events.
AngieB
None of her sociopolitical activities have any bearing her on her assessment as a player. Her player's accompishments are the only objective manner her ranking is considered.
The International Tennis Hall of Fame inducts players as well as officials or other people who were important for the game. BJK is in that grey area - only occupied by her, I think - between being a great player and a great politician (not just ambassador) for the game. Of course they're different types of accomplishment, but I think she would still be a hall of famer if she'd won 0 Slams. What I think is unique about her (and should make us think twice when judging her) is that her sociopolitical activities are indissociably linked to the very possibility of there being a WTA at all. No objective manner of ranking any player's accomplishments would be possible had she not played the game.
PBS featured her on American Masters last week. It was really interesting. She was from the wrong side of the tracks and, even as a girl, she thought that it was wrong that so many people were excluded from tennis at that time due to race and class. When she later turned pro, and women were totally getting muscled out of tennis, she started the Virginia Soims tour that formed the foundation for the WTA. She busted her butt so hard those years she barely slept and some argue that she could have won even more slams if she did nothing (like Court)(she also didnt want to play Riggs, but felt she had to because Court screwed up so bad). I know you can't dwell on the what ifs for slam counts, but I never really thought about that...anyway her less than priveledged upbringing also led her to do work to encourage kids to play tennis. The WS often mention meeting her and being encouraged by her as children. Anyway, I almost didn't watch the documentary, but I'm glad I did. If anyone wants to see it, it's still online at pbs.org. Look under American Masters.
Interesting. Thank you. Although I might not be able to see it where I live. :neutral:
PBS featured her on American Masters last week. It was really interesting. She was from the wrong side of the tracks and, even as a girl, she thought that it was wrong that so many people were excluded from tennis at that time due to race and class. When she later turned pro, and women were totally getting muscled out of tennis, she started the Virginia Soims tour that formed the foundation for the WTA. She busted her butt so hard those years she barely slept and some argue that she could have won even more slams if she did nothing (like Court)(she also didnt want to play Riggs, but felt she had to because Court screwed up so bad). I know you can't dwell on the what ifs for slam counts, but I never really thought about that...anyway her less than priveledged upbringing also led her to do work to encourage kids to play tennis. The WS often mention meeting her and being encouraged by her as children. Anyway, I almost didn't watch the documentary, but I'm glad I did. If anyone wants to see it, it's still online at pbs.org. Look under American Masters.
Oh...I hope it works. Where do you live?
None of her sociopolitical activities have any bearing her on her assessment as a player. Her player's accompishments are the only objective manner her ranking is considered.
For once, I agree with you.
Serena does take walkabouts sometimes during volatile matches that is for sure, but where is truly matters, at the GS events, she is 17-4 in grand slam singles finals.
Serena has an opportunity in the twilight of her career to closely reach her potential. I say this, because the extra years she has added to her career can make-up for the lean years in the mid 2000's. While she might not have reached her potential then, she is overachieving during a time in her career when she should be slowing down. Instead, she has played more matches than anyone else in the WTA this year.
The power of redemption. Its awesome!
AngieB
Serena does have an exceptional record in major finals, but you can also look at it the other way in that she is WAY behind Graf, Evert and Navratilova in final appearances. When Serena is playing well she is likely to win the tournament, but when she isn't she is far more likely to crash out earlier instead of gutting out those SF/F appearances.
Let's just agree she's not in the GOAT female tennis debate but she's head and shoulders above all the other players in terms of the sport's legacy. Simply because without her there would be no legacy to talk about.
For example: it's hard not to answer "Billie Jean King" when the question is "who was the most influential tennis player?"
Europe (but not U.K.).
"We're sorry, but this video is not available in your region due to right restrictions."
Damn.
Serena does have an exceptional record in major finals, but you can also look at it the other way in that she is WAY behind Graf, Evert and Navratilova in final appearances. When Serena is playing well she is likely to win the tournament, but when she isn't she is far more likely to crash out earlier instead of gutting out those SF/F appearances.
Serena does have an exceptional record in major finals, but you can also look at it the other way in that she is WAY behind Graf, Evert and Navratilova in final appearances. When Serena is playing well she is likely to win the tournament, but when she isn't she is far more likely to crash out earlier instead of gutting out those SF/F appearances.
PBS featured her on American Masters last week. It was really interesting. She was from the wrong side of the tracks and, even as a girl, she thought that it was wrong that so many people were excluded from tennis at that time due to race and class. When she later turned pro, and women were totally getting muscled out of tennis, she started the Virginia Soims tour that formed the foundation for the WTA. She busted her butt so hard those years she barely slept and some argue that she could have won even more slams if she did nothing (like Court)(she also didnt want to play Riggs, but felt she had to because Court screwed up so bad). I know you can't dwell on the what ifs for slam counts, but I never really thought about that...anyway her less than priveledged upbringing also led her to do work to encourage kids to play tennis. The WS often mention meeting her and being encouraged by her as children. Anyway, I almost didn't watch the documentary, but I'm glad I did. If anyone wants to see it, it's still online at pbs.org. Look under American Masters.
King led player efforts to support the first professional women's tennis tour in the 1970s called the Virginia Slims, founded by Gladys Heldman and funded by Joseph Cullman of Philip Morris.[97] Once the tour took flight, King worked tirelessly to promote it even though many of the other top players were not supportive. "For three years we had two tours and because of their governments [Martina] Navratilova and Olga Morozova had to play the other tour. Chris [Evert], Margaret [Court], Virginia [Wade], they let us do the pioneering work and they weren't very nice to us. If you go back and look at the old quotes; they played for the love of the game, we played for the money. When we got backing and money, we were all playing together – I wonder why? I tried not to get upset with them. Forgiveness is important. Our job was to have one voice and win them over.
Serena has played in 53 Grand Slams and missed 11 due to injury and family tragedy.
She has only lost in the First Round once, at the 2012 Roland Garros; and only once in 2 Round lost, at 1998 Australian Open.
She has 7 Third Round loses. So out of 53 Slams, only 9 times she didn’t make it to the 4th round. That’s 83% of the time she into the second week; not exactly “spotty”. And of the 16 years of competition, 6 of the years she didn’t win a Slam. To miss 11 chances to compete in a Slam but to have 17 Slams banked, I would call that "gutting" it out.
Could not have said it better. If it weren't for Billie Jean 40 years ago today, there is no telling what women's sports might look like today.The International Tennis Hall of Fame inducts players as well as officials or other people who were important for the game. BJK is in that grey area - only occupied by her, I think - between being a great player and a great politician (not just ambassador) for the game. Of course they're different types of accomplishment, but I think she would still be a hall of famer if she'd won 0 Slams. What I think is unique about her (and should make us think twice when judging her) is that her sociopolitical activities are indissociably linked to the very possibility of there being a WTA at all. No objective manner of ranking any player's accomplishments would be possible had she not played the game.
Well said; no matter how one tries to cut it, Serena is one of the greatest in almost every possible list.
What are you talking about? They only played twice. There is no conclusion to be drawn from two matches.
What are *you* talking about?
She couldn't get a wining h2h over an aging Graf with injury afflictions and better priorities than tennis at this point.
She's behind Graf. Deal with it.
From Wiki
Stop singling out Court.
What are *you* talking about?
She couldn't get a wining h2h over an aging Graf with injury afflictions and better priorities than tennis at this point.
She's behind Graf. Deal with it.
Is this the same Graf that won Roland Garros in 1999, the year she played Serena who was only on tour just less than 3 years when they played only twice?
Please find something else to hang your hat on.
She also was a Wimbledon finalist that year and was 29 years old not 35.
Just an FYI, there was a reason they named an entire United States Tennis Center after Billie Jean King. It wasn't because she was the greatest tennis player of all time. It was because she was the greatest contributor to the advancement of women's athletics and the cause of equal rights. Her contributions went far beyond the sport of tennis and much greater than winning the most tennis matches or grand slam events.
AngieB
I'm amazed at the assessment of Serena's mental toughness by "experts" on this thread. By Serena should been in good company; A certain Brooklyn Dodger from back in the day mental toughness was questioned too.
Where is Biz Markie when you need him?
You know as little about baseball as you do tennis. Jackie Robinson was a true pioneer with unquestionable courage and "mental toughness"... who also was happened to be one of the best of all time.
To even compare Serena to Jackie is idiotic and disrespectful to both players. You should be banned from further posting until you educate yourself.
Wow. Try learning a little history before lecturing others.
kiki,
of the four great players(graf, martina, serena, chris), which player do you believe she has the toughest field in their entire career?
....the way some think....
What's the matter Lob? You don't like it when your comments like “Serena being spotty” are so easily disproven just by using Google?
What don't you provide a definition of the word "spotty" because Serena getting to the second week of a Slam over 80% of the time is anything but "spotty".
Hefty, I could explain myself.... again, but what's the point. You and a few of your like closed minded friends only see what you want to see.
So instead of focusing on Mr. Lob, try to focus on the topic of discussion. :shock:
I don't agree with everything Mr. Lob has said, but I do agree that sometimes Serena's emotions get the better of her. Overall, she's extremely tough mentally, but there have been lapses. 2 jump to mind immediately: last year's FO where she was crying, and USO 09 where her anger which cost her match point (she probably would have lost anyway, but she denied herself the chance). I don't hold it against her...to me it just means she's human.
Could not have said it better. If it weren't for Billie Jean 40 years ago today, there is no telling what women's sports might look like today.
For everything the players enjoy today in the WTA, she could, but would never say, "I made you"
AngieB
kiki,
of the four great players(graf, martina, serena, chris), which player do you believe she has the toughest field in their entire career?