Well he didn't participate at AO so you can't hold that against him. Wimby was a shock exit but it wasn't as big a shock as it was in 2012.
And he did something not even his biggest fans would've imagined: The fall treble(even Fed and Novak haven't done it), that makes him a deserving YE#1 in my book. Plus 2 slams>1 slam, realise that this guy came from a 7 month break and pretty much annihilated the field on outdoor HC.
But you're right , no way Nadal goes 0-3 at the WTF in his group so the YE#1 is just a formality.
well i dont hold it against him, im just mentioning that for 2 g's he was none existant. take that as you will.
if he finishes ye#1 its full deserved, if he doesnt, well, no one gifted djokovic anything.
so its all semantics..
whatever happens, it goes down to the wire. i like it : )
edit: and just put that clown on ignore, i didnt have to read his bs comment but people had to requote it..
also nadal doesnt have to go 0-3, if he goes 1-3 and doesnt qualify for semi, i think he can lose it. as things stand now i think he has to win at least 2 rr matches. considering his group, i srsly cant see him not winning all 3 if need be.