C
chandu612
Guest
Talking about Djoker from 2011-2013
Discuss
Discuss
What kind of stupid thread is this?
Yeah I know. It's like people already forgot about little things like 18 finals out of 19 consecutive slams or the 237 consecutive days at number #1 or 23 consecutive slam semis or 36 slams consecutive slam quarters.
Yeah, it's like people have already forgotten.
Yeah I know. It's like people already forgot about little things like 18 finals out of 19 consecutive slams or the 237 consecutive days at number #1 or 23 consecutive slam semis or 36 slams consecutive slam quarters.
Talking about Djoker from 2011-2013
Discuss
Djokovic is far more consistent considering that he has to compete in a strong era against players like Nadal.
Yes, of course! How many Slam finals in a row now?
Djokovic is far more consistent considering that he has to compete in a strong era against players like Nadal.
Sarcasm obv but if not you can not be serious
You need to VERY CONSISTENT off BOTH WINGS to beat Nadal. Do you realize how difficult it is? Nadal is the litmus test for tennis performance. Either you can beat him with a good record spanning several meetings, or you can't. All other "records" are meaningless, like consistently being at the top of the class in a no-name college.
You need to VERY CONSISTENT off BOTH WINGS to beat Nadal. Do you realize how difficult it is? Nadal is the litmus test for tennis performance. Either you can beat him with a good record spanning several meetings, or you can't. All other "records" are meaningless, like consistently being at the top of the class in a no-name college.
Three consecutive seasons with winning % in the 90'es beg to differ.Talking about Djoker from 2011-2013
Discuss