And thank you for joining. Now for the more important question, which gummybears do you prefer?
You cannot be serious...
He has 5 Wimbledon finals and 2 titles...name me 10 players above him in the open era.
Nadal has more HC majors than lendl in a harder era.
Three USO 2 Wimbledons? One trick pony? That's hilarious.
.
I'm ill, so I've got nothing better to respond to than your troll thread and troll post.
1) We're talking US Open, now you're trying to change the conversation to HC majors, but sure - let's do that.
1a) In case you don't know/have forgotten, there was just one HC major for the vast majority of Lendl's pro career.
1b) Once the AO changed to HC in 1988, Lendl won it in 89 and 90 and made another final in 1991.
2) Lendl made the US Open final 8 years straight, winning 3 of them.
3) Lendl never won a HC slam without meeting a top-25 player.
4) Lendl beat guys like McEnroe, Edberg, Wilander, Becker, Connors, Noah and Mecir. And lost to guys like McEnroe, Connors, Becker and Wilander. Sure - not a tough era
4a) Lendl beat Noah, Connors and McEnroe in succession for his first US Open-title. Please remind me of a tougher HC slam win for Rafa?
4b) In 86, he beat Gilbert, Leconte, Edberg and Mecir. And in 87 it was McEnroe, Connors, Wilander. Again, please remind me of a tougher HC slam win for Rafa?
5) Lendl's got 5 HC slams and 6 HC RU's to Rafa's 4 HC slams and 4 HC RU's - and had the AO changed to HC sooner, there's little doubt those numbers would be even better for Lendl.
Case closed. Now go back to your cave and troll elsewhere.
P.s., you're lack of Lendl-knowledge reminds me of a fellow VB-member, see my signature (@clayqueen).
Yeah...putting you on my ignore list right away
Lendl had one of the toughest competitions of all players if not the toughest. It's ridiculous to even mention Nadal's US Open soft draws next to Lendl's hard court achievements.
You got to me mentally handicapped to even come with that logic.
Hahahahahha triggered by Fed's stats
The H2H is heavily clay skewed because Fed has always been a better and more consistent player on clay than Nadal is off clay. Now that is fact. Sorry to tell you that, mate.
I don't understand why they do it to themselves
It's not Federer's fault he has a bad matchup against Nadal. Life is unfair sometimes.
I was going to write a scathing reply about your Nadal gloating, but you got me with your last line.
Not indoors. That was the point of the thread really. I had hoped it might lead to an interesting technical discussion about the difference of playing indoors and outdoors as the disparity cant just be down to wind.
and no one was missing that poor soul. Damn.
That hardly makes sense. Could you edit it a bit please. Thank you.
I made out bits of it eventually. Federer missed three months this year..the whole clay swing. So you seem to be criticising him.
Didnt Nadal go 6-1 over Djokovic and 4-1 in Majors after that?
Remind me how being 4 behind is better than being 3 behind.? Again that logic doesnt really stack up. You seem to be saying Nadal and Djokovic are ahead of Federer. As i say its a three way debate so we will soon find out in around 5 years time.
People even had any doubts this is TennisATP? No other moron in the world would bring such stupid statistics and the quote on ignore list is pure gold. Come on, jackass, at least try harder when making a double account
Funny...he uses the same argument as @TennisATP
