parasailing
Legend
After the Gravity Pro failed to deliver better results than my trusted 2015 Blade 18x20, I am looking forward to giving the new Blades a shot at replacing my 2015 Blades. I am excited to get my new Blade probably in 3 weeks.
Specifically, the SW104 will have CV in it, but the regular Blade 104 won't.104 has cv in it only
Dying to hear your experience with the new blade. You kept me from buying the Gravity proAfter the Gravity Pro failed to deliver better results than my trusted 2015 Blade 18x20, I am looking forward to giving the new Blades a shot at replacing my 2015 Blades. I am excited to get my new Blade probably in 3 weeks.
Both racquets always had the same specs. Wilson QC at it again.334sw on 18x20 (If QC is on target)
328sw 16x19 62ra
18x20 would be 3-5gr heavier due to strings... 328sw vs 334 is not that bad...Both racquets always had the same specs. Wilson QC at it again.
The 2015 18 mains blade had an avg 327 sw and 328 for the 2015 16x19. These now have a higher SW according to their tested frames
Also, the Beam of the 18x20 is 1mm thinner than the 16x19... which I like. Not sure what the 2015 Blade beam was...22mm?
I like that the RA is also lower. Looking forward to the reviews and what you all have to say about it.
The 2015 18 mains blade had an avg 327 sw and 328 for the 2015 16x19. These now have a higher SW according to their tested frames
Yes, thank god. That's a perfect range for me since my black and golds were all 331-333 (I had 3 of them).. I am very interested now.
21.5 IIRC
Those Black/golds were beauties. You must be anxious now haha. If only the paint was a little better, more on the glossy side.. but hey if they play great !
After the Gravity Pro failed to deliver better results than my trusted 2015 Blade 18x20, I am looking forward to giving the new Blades a shot at replacing my 2015 Blades. I am excited to get my new Blade probably in 3 weeks.
The 2015 18 mains blade had an avg 327 sw and 328 for the 2015 16x19. These now have a higher SW according to their tested frames
Wish they would fix the Tapatalk plugin on the forums. Was gonna posts pics but can’t at the moment.
Also, the Beam of the 18x20 is 1mm thinner than the 16x19... which I like. Not sure what the 2015 Blade beam was...22mm?
I like that the RA is also lower. Looking forward to the reviews and what you all have to say about it.
Ok, so not that different. Specs still sound good. Wonder whether that means the Pro Staff racquets will also have a lower RA when they come out? Do you know when the Ultra Range is coming out and whether it will have the Tour version?
Did you ever try the G360 Speed MP or Pro and what did you think performance wise?
According to the Wilson technical rep, their goal was to drop the SW a bit compared to the CV version.
They seem much more HH than stated. When you pick it up it's really noticeable. Anyone else feel this with the current model?Blade is unique in that it generally feels more powerful than almost all of its competitors/similar spec'd frames.
they are released in TW video posted above..Are the Blade 98 RA and SW released?
They seem much more HH than stated. When you pick it up it's really noticeable. Anyone else feel this with the current model?
They seem much more HH than stated. When you pick it up it's really noticeable. Anyone else feel this with the current model?
Wilson, keeping TW's MRT program in business.That has to do with poor Wilson quality control. The variance can be huge.
Funny how different strokes for different folks works. I would rate 2015 blade as the worst blade of all generations while you like it more that’s why there is a demo program I guess . I felt like it was worst for my arm than any gen I tried before or after while you liked it. Maybe I had a lemonNeither G360 Speeds can compare to my 2015 Blade 98. I use to use a Graphene Speed Pro 18x20 prior to switching over to the 2015 Blade 18x20. The Graphene Speed Pro had more power but was stiffer and that caused me some weird hand pain. Once I switched over to the 2015 Blade 98 which is more dampen and forgiving, I didn't have any further pain.
In general, all the Head Graphene line is stiffer but the Gravity models changed that. It feels softer and more comfortable but the Blade offers more power and plow while offering similar comfort so I decided to pass on the Gravity Pro.
The MP series is probably the better one to try since you can customize it to your liking. If you prefer a stiffer racquet, go with the G360 MP. If you want comfort, go with the Gravity MP.
Funny how different strokes for different folks works. I would rate 2015 blade as the worst blade of all generations while you like it more that’s why there is a demo program I guess .
For the "n th" time,there is no 'freeflex' on the blades.Not sure if this has been posted yet, but the auto-translate works quite well and it gives lots of detail on what the "free-flex" technology is. It looks like it increases linear flexation in the parallel and vertical axis while decreasing tortional flexation. So it maintains it's planar string-bed better AKA "control" on off-center hits while still being flexy. I'm still curious about the power described by users of the Clash and hopefully to a degree will be exhibited by the Blade v7. I wonder if they try and tune the response of the flex so that it is able to flex considerably upon impact and then return a greater portion of that energy into momentum onto the ball when it returns to center. As in the energy won't get left over as oscillations in the racket while the racket is not longer in contact with the ball. I wonder if anyone with more knowledge on materials science has an opinion on this. You can imagine for example if frequency of the harmonic response is too low then the ball will leave the strings at a greater right angle and energy will be left in the bent "loaded" frame not conferred to the ball, and if the frequency is too high then the ball will leave at a greater left angle, but will have been "pushed" by at least by the oscillation of the racket. Once again, would love some real insight into this.
For the "n th" time,there is no 'freeflex' on the blades.
You mean the old Blades I assume...
Ahhh...I see he said Free Flex. Gotcha.
Neither G360 Speeds can compare to my 2015 Blade 98. I use to use a Graphene Speed Pro 18x20 prior to switching over to the 2015 Blade 18x20. The Graphene Speed Pro had more power but was stiffer and that caused me some weird hand pain. Once I switched over to the 2015 Blade 98 which is more dampen and forgiving, I didn't have any further pain.
In general, all the Head Graphene line is stiffer but the Gravity models changed that. It feels softer and more comfortable but the Blade offers more power and plow while offering similar comfort so I decided to pass on the Gravity Pro.
The MP series is probably the better one to try since you can customize it to your liking. If you prefer a stiffer racquet, go with the G360 MP. If you want comfort, go with the Gravity MP.
So many claims about blades having the clash technology. I mean... THEN WHERE IS THE " STABLE SMART" TECHNOLOGY ON BLADE THEN? EATEN BY RAONIC AND HALEP OVER DINNER?
I’ve said, the carbon mapping technology or lessons of the Clash are used in the Blade, but it is very different and a much more solid feel to me. The Feeflex is done really well in the frame.
I've just always been turned off by the recent blades because of their low static weight. And yes 11.4oz strung is too low for me. The sweet spot for me is around 11.7 strung. Wish they made a beefier blade in stock form. I'll be leaning towards the new vcore 18x20 or the gravity pro.
So easy to get the blade to 11.7oz. Change to a leather grip and add on overgrip and you are there. Or shove some putty under the butt cap and add an overgrip and you are there.I've just always been turned off by the recent blades because of their low static weight. And yes 11.4oz strung is too low for me. The sweet spot for me is around 11.7 strung. Wish they made a beefier blade in stock form. I'll be leaning towards the new vcore 18x20 or the gravity pro.
The reason I asked you is because I have the G360 Speed MP and love it. I consider the 2015 Blade 98 18x20 to be the best racket I've ever played with btw. But the G360 MP comes very very close performance wise for me. Maybe the feel is not great and it's a bit stiffer than the Blade but serving with that "thing" can be very fun. That's why I asked, I wanted to see what another 2015 Blade admirer had to say about the Speed MP.
I actually demo'd the Gravity MP and found the feel to be truly amazing. Will definitely need to try one out for a longer time period. Truly impressed by how soft yet crispy it felt, especially after trying the last G360 Radical which I didn't like at all.
Wilson Blade V7 Racquet Review - First Impressions | Tennisnerd.net
The Wilson Blade is one of the most popular racquet series on the market for control-oriented players. Now it is time for version 7 and our guest writer Henrik Wallensten got his hands on the new racquet for a brief play-test. These are his Wilson Blade V7 Racquet Review - First Impressions.tennisnerd.net
First impressions online on tennisnerds !
Now I am hesitating to try the 16x19 I only play with 18x20 but this 16x19 version of the blade seems to play like a 18x20
What will you do ? Do you think the 18x20 version is really that lowered powered than the 2015 or cv version ?
Whahou this is such a good news ! I would also love to love the 16x19 BladeI (who made this guest-article) never liked the 16/19 Blade in the past. I really WANTED to like them because in all other frames i always use 16/19 but never got the right groove with 16/19 and the 18/20 felt much better, in all previous Blades. But now, this frame just feels so good in 16/19. No control issues what so ever compared to previous versions. I have not tried the 18/20 though so can´t compare how the new V7 feels with the tighter string-pattern. On a side note: Also feel free to let me know what i can improve in these reviews. I always want to be better on the reviews and all feedback is of great value!