Slice ****s up even ATP pros. Slice can induce UE at every level, including the very top. Very hard to attack a slice even for ATP. (See video proof)
Yes, GOOD slice is very difficult to attack... the best you can do with good slice is a) make a good slice back or b) make an EXCEPTIONAL (even for a pro) shot to attack a slice for a winner - very low percentage... if you can't make a GOOD slice back on a well sliced ball, chances are you're going to put back a ball that the other pro can attack.
They explosively recover immediately after hitting the ball. It's like they are running back to center before the stroke is even finished.
And that's because they have to... because pros can attack and hit offensive shots at will, off of balls that you and I and even 5.0 players would only think to just get back, if we even could, let alone attack them... this is the legitimate difference between pro conditioning and rec player conditioning. Try playing this way, actively explosively recovering after every shot - even at your fitness, which I think is pretty solid, I suspect your legs and lungs will be burning in a hurry.
They swing slower when ball is out of strike zone. They can do a 50% swing that is not slice, but top. They are great at modulating. (form of pusher compared to 3.5 maniac at 100%
This is a good lesson and I will put this into my own game. I never realized it, but it makes sense.
ATP pros make tons and tons of errors. They constantly make errors. They hit tons of balls into the net. And tons wide. And tons long. Points rarely last over 4 shots. They immediately ask for towel after UE. Immediate reset. Usually.
They sure do make tons of errors, but then they're playing against other pros, and they need to push the limits of what they can attack and hit aggressively because if they give the opponent (another pro) a neutral ball, chances are it will be attacked... so.. these are unforced errors... but not always TRULY unforced... they would never a) have as hard a shot to handle from a rec player and b) have to hit such an aggressive shot against a rec player... so one could argue that the errors aren't truly "unforced" but rather forced by virtue of their opponent... in the end though... the term "unforced error" is relative to the competition.
Some 3.5's hit harder than ATP pros on certain shot. These guys don't hit nearly as hard as everyone pretends. Noah Rubin can crush the ball.
I'll give you that some 3.5s hit certain shots harder than ATP pros, but that it is almost never to good results. As for the pros not hitting as hard as everyone pretends - I can only say that from watching pros courtside, the ball is FKN MOVING! I can't say how hard everyone pretends that they hit, but I can tell you that I would be hard pressed to just cooperatively rally with even a 5.0 for more than a few strokes unless they backed down their pace a bit... I can only imagine a pro's "cooperative rally" ball pace.
I've told you the story about rallying with my 5.0 coach where I RIPPED a forehand - the best forehand I may have ever hit and he neatly stepped over to it, ripped it back from behind the baseline. I knew off his racquet exactly where the ball was going (about 6 or 8 feet to my forehand side - an easy 2 steps from me and I was standing behind the baseline too, over 80 feet away from the contact) and I also knew in that instant that there was no way in hell that I would have had the time to get prepped to return that ball if it had been hit right to me, let alone make the 2 steps to it... that's only 5.0 pace.
Everything is relative. If one of these pros were playing with you or me, they'd make fewer than 5% errors out of their total strokes the whole match - we do not have the pace to challenge them, nor do they need the pace or precision they need against other pros to beat us, so they'd be playing nice and easy, comfortable, casual shots, and would be blowing us off the court, all while making next to no errors themselves. Meanwhile, against another pro, the whole thing is different.
Paul Annacone once said on a broadcast (I'm paraphrasing slightly) "Playing the "one more ball" strategy is valid all the way up to the top 200 of the ATP". There are two messages to take away from that statement. One is for the rec player, and it is that keeping the ball in play is a valid strategy for all of our conceivable aspirations. The other message is for pros, and that message is that if you want to break into the top 200, you need to learn to successfully attack more balls than you ever thought about doing - because inside the top 200, everyone else is doing that, and if you're just playing "one more ball" they're going to blow you off the court.