Pathetic biased poll options. This final is incredible for tennis and the mens tour.
Another boring Djokovic final would have been hideous. That US Open final was a yawnfest.
I couldn’t be more excited for Sinner v Medvedev!! And know that so many agree. You’re in the minority.
@dking68 @Kralingen lets gooo!
In all fairness his game has probably become more attractive the last couple of years, upping the aggression, coming to net moreWasn't Djokovic's game considered unattractive, yet tennis still managed to survive with him dominating for so long.
We have already lost. Evil has already won.
Medvedev in a slam final. Medvedev giving a post match speech. The world should not have to be subjected to Medvedev’s disgusting game, antics, and behavior. I feel embarrassed discussing the sport with friends of mine whom I respect. I would never force them to watch such a scourge on tennis as the deplorable Medvedev.
Personally, even if Sinner wins in straights, it will not be enough. Medvedev simply showing up and being broadcast on the world’s biggest stage is a victory for evil and defeat for good.
hv u stop watching whenever djoker played?Who is more boring?
Is this final good for tennis ?
First Aus Open Final since 2005 without Federer/Nadal/Djokovic
I am confused on whom to support, both of them are unattractive gamewise
Links with drug lords, mafia, ? Supporting invasion?He is not that bad. Why do you feel he is evil ? He seems like a friendly person..
ChatGPT?Medvedev in a slam final. Medvedev giving a post match speech. The world should not have to be subjected to Medvedev’s disgusting game, antics, and behavior. I feel embarrassed discussing the sport with friends of mine whom I respect. I would never force them to watch such a scourge on tennis as the deplorable Medvedev.
This thread is boring.Who is more boring?
Is this final good for tennis ?
First Aus Open Final since 2005 without Federer/Nadal/Djokovic
I am confused on whom to support, both of them are unattractive gamewise
You excluded the option - Sinner has entertaining game but boring personality.
We have already lost. Evil has already won.
Medvedev in a slam final. Medvedev giving a post match speech. The world should not have to be subjected to Medvedev’s disgusting game, antics, and behavior. I feel embarrassed discussing the sport with friends of mine whom I respect. I would never force them to watch such a scourge on tennis as the deplorable Medvedev.
Personally, even if Sinner wins in straights, it will not be enough. Medvedev simply showing up and being broadcast on the world’s biggest stage is a victory for evil and defeat for good.
Thank youAdded 4th option for you
Nah, evil winning would be Zverev in the final, was bad enough him beating Alcaraz which turned out to be of no consequence. Trust Zverev to come in and randomly peak just to f**k things up.We have already lost. Evil has already won.
Medvedev in a slam final. Medvedev giving a post match speech. The world should not have to be subjected to Medvedev’s disgusting game, antics, and behavior. I feel embarrassed discussing the sport with friends of mine whom I respect. I would never force them to watch such a scourge on tennis as the deplorable Medvedev.
Personally, even if Sinner wins in straights, it will not be enough. Medvedev simply showing up and being broadcast on the world’s biggest stage is a victory for evil and defeat for good.
A bit rich coming from a Djokovic (the most boring style in history) fan - don't you think?Who is more boring?
Is this final good for tennis ?
First Aus Open Final since 2005 without Federer/Nadal/Djokovic
I am confused on whom to support, both of them are unattractive gamewise
A bit rich coming from a Djokovic (the most boring style in history) fan - don't you think?
A walking bottle of Nyquil lolA bit rich coming from a Djokovic (the most boring style in history) fan - don't you think?
most boring style in history is your opinion and your fellow cultists opinion. Lot of us even on this forum like Djokovic play and support him. Pls don’t generalize and speak for everyone.A bit rich coming from a Djokovic (the most boring style in history) fan - don't you think?.
Of course it is my opinion and I'm expressing it. It is generally accepted that Djokovic does not play entertaining tennis. He used to - in his early days before adopting his snooze play style.most boring style in history is your opinion and your fellow cultists opinion. Lot of us even on this forum like Djokovic play and support him. Pls don’t generalize and speak for everyone.
This is also a silly poll and qn: there are enough Sinner and Med supporters who will likely enjoy the game trow. Sinner’s game is pretty entertaining to me and Med has his own quirky wierd style to keep things interesting. Jeez some tennis fans on here…
Support SinnerWho is more boring?
Is this final good for tennis ?
First Aus Open Final since 2005 without Federer/Nadal/Djokovic
I am confused on whom to support, both of them are unattractive gamewise
OP said that ALPHA Novak Djokovic was going to blow away BETA Jannik Sinner. It didn't happen, I am very much confused !
I have nothing against your opinion, don’t care about it nor looking to change it. I don’t agree with the generalization from a self selected adverse sample in these forums. I know plenty who like Djokovic and his game. I get its not everyone’s cup of tea also. So let’s leave it at that.Of course it is my opinion and I'm expressing it. It is generally accepted that Djokovic does not play entertaining tennis. He used to - in his early days before adopting his snooze play style.
That has nothing to do with who you or I support.
Imo even some "one slam wonders" should be respected. Medvedev for example gained my respect. Does not matter he only has 1 slam, but he already reached multiple slam finals and he is consistent Top 1-3 HC player since 2019. It is not a fluke at all.If Sinner can win tomorrow and then not be a 1 slam wonder then we will have to respect him. Multiple slam winners have to be taken seriously..
I can guarantee you if he wins tomorrow, he'll be a multiple slam wonder.If Sinner can win tomorrow and then not be a 1 slam wonder then we will have to respect him. Multiple slam winners have to be taken seriously..
I can guarantee you if he wins tomorrow, he'll be a multiple slam wonder.
He just needs that validation to become a dominant player. He reminds me of Sampras (not play wise) in his demeanour - he lets his play and results speak for itself.
The Octopus is in the way. He will need to shorten the points.
I and just about every player on the ATP tour would LOVE to win 24 slams with a boring game.Wasn't Djokovic's game considered unattractive, yet tennis still managed to survive with him dominating for so long.
Alcaraz will win W and FOs. I don't think Sinner has the game to beat Alcaraz on clay. W could go either way.If Sinner is next double digit slam winner then this means Alcaraz will indeed end up as a Hewitt. Alcaraz already seems to have peaked and from here if he ends up as Sinner's pigeon then the road ahead won't be a pleasant one. Even if he wins 1-2 slams more that still would be a disappointment for him given how much he has achieved at 20..
You are right about demeanour....Sinner doesn't speak much or look over enigmatic... Like Rune or Alcaraz.... That's a plus point and it could make him dangerous
Wimbledon cancellation in 2020 was the reason Novak has 7 titles, not the young guns. You can bet all the maharaja treasures that Novak will not stop until he reaches at least 8 Wimbledon titles and 5 US Open titles.Sinner and Alcaraz could ensure that Djokovic never equals Federer's Wimbledon mark. They will protect Federer's last shred of dignity. 90s gen failed to stop Djokodal from reaching Federer's 20 but Sinner and Alcaraz could help Federer keep his last record of importance i.e the wimbledon record.