17 > 0.3 > 1
GS QFS?17 > 0.
Si Senor.GS QFS?
Mostly because of big4Right now Berdych obviously. But Zverev will be better because he has greater will. Pearduck never realised his full potential because of muggery.
i think that's happening right now...I think Zverev might develop that extra gear that Berdych never had.
Mostly because of big4
If you are insinuating that Zverev will end up another Berdych... Well, I guess I could see it, but I sure hope not.
Berdych had quite a bit of that sort of arrogance that people get on Sascha's case for in his younger days. He pissed Madrid off something fierce back in 2005. Of course Zverev has certainly eclipsed him on that front, he's also eclipsed him when it comes to accomplishments at this stage in their respective careers. What remains to be seen is if he'll do the same going forward. We can but hope.
One post:
“Berdych, obviously”
Another post:
“Zverev, clearly”
Rinse and repeat.
Love it.
Praise the goatMe defending Berdych, PCB, Dimitrov on this forum:
Me saying Goffin has done nothing compared to Zverev:
Breathing on TTW:
Praising Federer:
Berdych had to deal with Big 4 in Prime.
Zeverev has a cakewalk era to look forward too.
Agree. There's nothing mechanically wrong with Zverev's FH - he probably just either goes for too much or changes his mind at the last minute. A few more big wins and the confidence that comes with it and that will go away. Wawrinka and Gasquet each built decent FHs eventually.Zverev has the potential to be a lot better than Berdych mainly because of his movement and rock solid backhand. Many players improve their forehands but a weak backhand can follow you for an entire career.
No it doesn't.Is this OP’s tacit acknowledgment that Berdych’s game stacks up better than Roddick’s?
You left out mental strength. It is an important aspect of what makes a great player and shouldn't be overlooked.Serve: Zedrot > Bendych
Return: Tie?
Forehand: Bendych >> Zedrot
Backhand: Zedrot > Bendych
Movement: Zedrot > Bendych
Netgame: Bendych >> Zedrot
Charisma: LOL
You must be joking.Agree. There's nothing mechanically wrong with Zverev's FH - he probably just either goes for too much or changes his mind at the last minute. A few more big wins and the confidence that comes with it and that will go away. Wawrinka and Gasquet each built decent FHs eventually.
"Vulturer"? Please be objective, not a hater. I am not a Zverev fan but let's be realistic. I don't know about peak Berdych on grass, I didn't watch too many of his grass matches.Berdych's peak level was scary but unfortunately it came in 2010-2014. Zverev the joke draw vulturer can only dream of that level.
No it wasn't.Berdych's peak level was scary
That poster started watching tennis after Berdych's peak was past him. Or maybe caught the tail end of it.No it wasn't.
No it wasn't.
Each time a big four player lost to him at a slam it was due them being in poor form.
Ok.That poster started watching tennis after Berdych's peak was past him. Or maybe caught the tail end of it.
A Murray who was just to have back surgery a month later?
Yes Federer won Cincinnati just before this tournament not losing a set, not being broken giving Djokovic a bagel in the final and reached the QF of the US Open with ease (didn't lose more than 4 games in any set). Very poor form.Each time a big four player lost to him at a slam it was due them being in poor form.
I’d love to see how Zverev would do if he played against in the big 4 in their prime.
Lol.
In that match he was in poor form. It doesn't matter what he did in the previous rounds.Yes Federer won Cincinnati just before this tournament not losing a set, not being broken giving Djokovic a bagel in the final and reached the QF of the US Open with ease (didn't lose more than 4 games in any set). Very poor form.
And Novak in his two Wimbledon losses, RAFA in AO15 and Murray on clay in 2010.In that match he was in poor form. It doesn't matter what he did in the previous rounds.
Both of Berdych's slam victories over Fed have come against a Federer in poor form.
2010 Wimbledon totally but Federer had no reason to lose at the 2012 US Open other than Berdych GOATing. I remember that match like it was yesterday, Berdych was serving bombs, hitting huge groundstrokes and for once was actually mentally tough. That's what I meant with peak Berdych. I have never seen Zverev play with that much authority against anyone. His forehand is too frail.In that match he was in poor form. It doesn't matter what he did in the previous rounds.
Both of Berdych's slam victories over Fed have come against a Federer in poor form.
2010 Wimbledon totally but Federer had no reason to lose at the 2012 US Open other than Berdych GOATing. I remember that match like it was yesterday, Berdych was serving bombs, hitting huge groundstrokes and for once was actually mentally tough. That's what I meant with peak Berdych. I have never seen Zverev play with that much authority against anyone. His forehand is too frail.
Say what you want but Berdych actually had good records against both Federer (5-3 in 2010-2013) and Murray (6-4 until early 2015) at the time and could score the odd upset against Djokovic/Nadal while often giving them close matches. You can't use the same excuse of being in poor form when you lose several times to the same player. Not to mention that in 2010-2013 the big 4 were pretty much in their primes unlike now when Murray is not playing at all, Djokovic is only showing glimpses of old form, Federer is almost 37 while Nadal pretty much remains a force on clay only.
Zverev will be a multiple Slam winner. Berdych, not.