CYGS is not the Ultimate Achievement in Tennis, DOMINATING 3 Generations is .....

CYGS is not the Ultimate Achievement in Tennis, DOMINATING 3 Generations is ....

  • I agree, this is the biggest achievement ever, more than Laver's CYGS/Novak's NCYGS

  • I disagree, this is not the biggest achievement ever, Laver's CYGS/Novak's NCYGS are bigger


Results are only viewable after voting.

Sunny014

Legend
You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.

Oh ****, you're right Nishikori's bank account is on another level compared to many other ATGs so he should definitely be included in each GOAT list there is.

Bank Accounts will be checked for guys who held slams record in their careers at least for 1 day and also if possible the weeks at 1 record as well, that way we know they earned money for their tennis skills and not because of them being a one eyed king among blind men in their country.

The point is, this is not about bank account, it is about brand value which signified iconic status, so if the greatest player of all time doesn't have an iconic status big enough then it means his records did not have the impact that they should have had..... it is simple
 

The Blond Blur

G.O.A.T.
Yes, we badly need Bagdhatis, Melzer, Youzhny or Schuttler deep in the second week of Slams, for the Tour to become more vivid again. LOL
Melzer beat Joker from 2-0 down, so good self own there I guess. And that’s still better than Karatsev (playing in his first main draw of a major), and Shapo wetting the bed on every BP chance. ;)
 
Different achievements hard to compare, basically longevity vs concentrated dominance. In terms of difficulty though winning 13 titles at ANY slam (which basically per definition includes dominating three generations) is harder to achieve. We have seen CYGS and even if Novak does not win it this year it will happen again at some point. 13 titles at one slam is unique until now and I seriously doubt anyone of us will see another player in his lifetime who will repeat this feat.
 

6august

Hall of Fame
After being abandoned by Federer fans themselves, OP starts to look for new allies from Fred's nemesis fanbase.

:laughing::laughing:

How about this, I will convince Djoko fans to pay you 1 USD for each pro- Nole post by you and 1 $ for each anti Federer post. Do you accept the deal?
 

Sunny014

Legend
Different achievements hard to compare, basically longevity vs concentrated dominance. In terms of difficulty though winning 13 titles at ANY slam (which basically per definition includes dominating three generations) is harder to achieve. We have seen CYGS and even if Novak does not win it this year it will happen again at some point. 13 titles at one slam is unique until now and I seriously doubt anyone of us will see another player in his lifetime who will repeat this feat.

Right

Dominating 3 generations at a stretch, that is like close to 2 decades.

Never seen before on any surface and never shall be seen again, NCYGS/CYGS has happened in a few times in ATP and WTA, shall happen again.
 

Madinolf

Rookie
I thought you were talking of winning

3 slams in a row in 2011-12
4 slams in a row in 2015-16
3 slams in a row in 2018-19
3 slams in a row in 2021

Now THAT is dominating different generations across different surfaces.
 

Strale

Semi-Pro
I thought you were talking of winning

3 slams in a row in 2011-12
4 slams in a row in 2015-16
3 slams in a row in 2018-19
3 slams in a row in 2021

Now THAT is dominating different generations across different surfaces.
That is 13 slams and with high probability it might become 14...Also it is achieved in less time than 13 FO of Nadal.

So Djokovic is superior confirmed.
 

Sunny014

Legend
If it's just, then it is understandable why nobody after Laver did it.

Holding 4 slams together, anyone can do it....

Don Budge did it
Laver did it twice (must be very easy back then)
Mcenroe almost did it (he was stopped by zoning ATG Lendl and in his time AO was skipped)
Connors would also have done it but only 3 slams that year, that prevented him....
Steffi did it
Serena did it
Navratilova did it
Novak did it
Fed would have done it 2 times back to back but Nadal who was at his peak stopped him, if Fed had the luxury of playing geriatric nadal of 2021 or injured nadal of 2015 then Fed would have done it twice

Holding 4 slams anyone can do...... no big deal

13 SLAMS ON ONE SURFACE..... NO ONE CAN EXCEPT RAFAEL NADAL ....
 
O

OhYes

Guest
Holding 4 slams together, anyone can do it....

Don Budge did it
Laver did it twice (must be very easy back then)
Mcenroe almost did it (he was stopped by zoning ATG Lendl and in his time AO was skipped)
Connors would also have done it but only 3 slams that year, that prevented him....
Steffi did it
Serena did it
Navratilova did it
Novak did it
Fed would have done it 2 times back to back but Nadal who was at his peak stopped him, if Fed had the luxury of playing geriatric nadal of 2021 or injured nadal of 2015 then Fed would have done it twice

Holding 4 slams anyone can do...... no big deal

13 SLAMS ON ONE SURFACE..... NO ONE CAN EXCEPT RAFAEL NADAL ....
So except those from midle ages, WTA, and "almost did it but someone prevent it bohooo", nobody else did it. :-D
Good to know your filters ;)
 

RaulRamirez

Legend
Yes, what Rafa has done on clay, in general, and at RG in particular, has been remarkable...but why the need to denigrate Novak's (possible) CYGS and what he already achieved (the NCYGS) -- neither of which has been achieved (talking men only) since Laver.
Now, if you asked me, I would guess that the NCYGS and maybe even the CYGS (whether achieved by Novak or not this year) will be achieved before someone will win a single major 13 or more times. But, this is apples, and maybe zucchini -- how does one compare them.

One more point. People concede that Rafa is "King of Clay", but often, in the next breath, do so in a way that diminishes his other accomplishments or seeks to marginalize clay. Now, if you (generally) want to say that he can't be the mythical GOAT because of not enough weeks at #1 or no WTF titles, I disagree, but that's somewhat reasonable. If you say he can't be GOAT due to "clay skew", I very much disagree, and find that less reasonable.
 

ibbi

G.O.A.T.
Particularly in this day and age, winning the grand slam is not even a little bit comparable to winning 13 titles at a single major, but the two achievements are indicative of two completely different things, so pointless to even compare.
 

Sunny014

Legend
So except those from midle ages, WTA, and "almost did it but someone prevent it bohooo", nobody else did it. :-D
Good to know your filters ;)


If so many people can do it or come close to it and only be stopped by more formidable opposition than what Novak is facing then surely it must not be that big a deal.

I donno whats the hype

Martina Navratilova once won 6 out of 7 slams played at a stretch, can we imagine anyone do that??? Is CYGS bigger than that ??
 

Sunny014

Legend
Navratilova's form like this is beyond the dream of anyone

Singles

241181358_2643918689087945_1386810044809863085_n.jpg


Doubles in this same period

241178515_2643920372421110_8702571590778623095_n.jpg
 

gadge

Hall of Fame
Lol no one ever said rafas record on clay especially at RG is mediocre. Everyone pretty much agrees no body dominated a single surface like he did, you’re just doing this to denigrate Novak’s potential CYGS to feel better.
If it were so easy why fed and Rafa struggled to do it?? They haven’t even come close to this
 

Sunny014

Legend
Lol no one ever said rafas record on clay especially at RG is mediocre. Everyone pretty much agrees no body dominated a single surface like he did, you’re just doing this to denigrate Novak’s potential CYGS to feel better.
If it were so easy why fed and Rafa struggled to do it?? They haven’t even come close to this

If Fed had geriatric Rafa of 2021 or injured Rafa of 2016 skipping FO back in his time of 06-07 then Federer would have won 8 slams in a row, i.e 2 CYGS back to back, LOL

This CYGS is overrated by Nole fans

Nadal dominated slam head to head when the players were all in their 20s and not a million years old. Nadal also has the generic numbers in and around the same ballpark as his rivals. Djokovic needs to seperate himself from the slamcount for there to be no argument on GOAT.

100% True, Nole has to seperate himself from the pack with 24-25 slams to be considered that.
 

gadge

Hall of Fame
If Fed had geriatric Rafa of 2021 or injured Rafa of 2016 skipping FO back in his time of 06-07 then Federer would have won 8 slams in a row, i.e 2 CYGS back to back, LOL

This CYGS is overrated by Nole fans



100% True, Nole has to seperate himself from the pack with 24-25 slams to be considered that.
Coulda shoulda woulda

and Rafa got his ass kicked by a 37 year old fed when he was in his early 30s
 

Sunny014

Legend
Coulda shoulda woulda

and Rafa got his ass kicked by a 37 year old fed when he was in his early 30s

Talk of Clay.

How comes Rafa dominated 16 years on it ?

3 generation of athletes came and failed.

Federer was the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Federer's peak
Djokovic was the best clay courter from his gen (excluding Rafa of course) and Rafa stole 5 slams on clay in Novak's Peak
Thiem was/is the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Thiem's Peak
 

itrium84

Hall of Fame
Winning all masters, WTF (lack of it) etc etc are cumulative achievements or flaws, not a single largest feat that stretches across 100 years....

I am talking about sustaining dominance over multiple generations, that is true power, that is what defying nature means.

Nadal prevented guys older than him from winning clay, he prevented guys aged same as him, then even those younger to him have no chance, this is ABNORMAL.

This guy clearly stands out from anyone that ever held the racquet.
I prefer Novak domination over entire tennis field for 10+ years over Rafa's domination over clay tennis solely for 15 years. Novak is tennis GOAT, Rafa is clay GOAT - we all knew that before this thread.
 

gadge

Hall of Fame
Talk of Clay.

How comes Rafa dominated 16 years on it ?

3 generation of athletes came and failed.

Federer was the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Federer's peak
Djokovic was the best clay courter from his gen (excluding Rafa of course) and Rafa stole 5 slams on clay in Novak's Peak
Thiem was/is the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Thiem's Peak
For the love of god, no one not even a single person challenges rafas clay court dominance but it’s not an argument for GOAT status
 

Sunny014

Legend
I prefer Novak domination over entire tennis field for 10+ years over Rafa's domination over clay tennis solely for 15 years. Novak is tennis GOAT, Rafa is clay GOAT - we all knew that before this thread.

Novak's master who has beaten him at the AO, USO and on Clay

In his own peak Novak was Stan's bunny

wawrinka-hammer.jpg
 
O

OhYes

Guest
If so many people can do it or come close to it and only be stopped by more formidable opposition than what Novak is facing then surely it must not be that big a deal.

I donno whats the hype

Martina Navratilova once won 6 out of 7 slams played at a stretch, can we imagine anyone do that??? Is CYGS bigger than that ??
You really compare 1960's with 2020's ? You really ccompare WTA with ATP ?
You must be desperate then. And it's amusing to watch.
How about compare it with relevant thing - ATP from 1980's till now. And don't give me could've, should've examples cause it can go both ways
 

Lgoel

Rookie
Rafa is clay god. That is established for ever. There is no comparable case
in tennis for that

However , being so good at clay doesn't mean you are the best tennis player.CYGS requires you to master all surfaces and keep winning everything. It is a great challenge to do so.

Again 13 slams vs CYGS is not even a comparison. But 21 grand slams including CYGS trump 20 with 13 at clay
 

Sunny014

Legend
It is better to have a Season like Mcenroe's 84 or even Novak's 2011 than a weak 2015-2016 type period when he held all 4 slams or this 2021 cygs

You are not fans of tennis if you prefer someone win 4 slams vs mugs over good tennis..
 
D

Deleted member 748597

Guest
It is better to have a Season like Mcenroe's 84 or even Novak's 2011 than a weak 2015-2016 type period when he held all 4 slams or this 2021 cygs

You are not fans of tennis if you prefer someone win 4 slams vs mugs over good tennis..
Murray and 2015 Federer weren't mugs.
 

killerboss

Professional
However , being so good at clay doesn't mean you are the best tennis player.CYGS

Then how do you explain 4-3 2-1? In fact any current gen player winning 4 slams at same event would be hyped up as amazing and the next big thing by tennis experts and posters on here.
 

Sunny014

Legend
Murray and 2015 Federer weren't mugs.

Murray in the FO final is mug level compared to Nadal and Lendl who stopped Fed (twice) and Mcenroe from winning all slams in those years

Anyway, 2015-2016 was still a good run, the 2021 one is a shame and bogus.
 

Texas Tennis Fan

Professional
Nadal is a great clay court player but has not won Wimbledon for more than 10 years, the AO since 2009, and has never won the YE championships. He also has few people who can challenge him on clay because there are no strong players on clay other than Djokovic and a younger Federer.

Want impressive? How about Djokovic having won 8 of the last 12 slams with the 4 losses including one injury (2019 USO), one DQ (imagine if that ball had hit her leg instead of her throat; 2020 USO), one loss to Thiem in a SF hurricane (2019 FO), and one loss to a rested Nadal in 2021 FO when the season was compressed and Djokovic was very tired). Not saying those losses may not have remained losses, but that record is pretty amazing.

Also, Nadal is only 11 months younger than Djokovic, so the old Nadal argument is beyond silly.
 

itrium84

Hall of Fame
Novak's master who has beaten him at the AO, USO and on Clay

In his own peak Novak was Stan's bunny

wawrinka-hammer.jpg
And became GOAT despite those loses. Yeah, even GOATs lose matches. It's an uphill battle, filled with loss, downfalls and doubt. Ask ex-GOAT Federer, he will confirm.
 

itrium84

Hall of Fame
Murray in the FO final is mug level compared to Nadal and Lendl who stopped Fed (twice) and Mcenroe from winning all slams in those years

Anyway, 2015-2016 was still a good run, the 2021 one is a shame and bogus.
2015-16, the "good run", was BOAT period in whole tennis history. Previously unseen domination of one player. So yeah, it really was a pretty good run.
 

ChrisRF

Legend
The point is, this is not about bank account, it is about brand value which signified iconic status, so if the greatest player of all time doesn't have an iconic status big enough then it means his records did not have the impact that they should have had..... it is simple
Now that’s worth discussing for once. However, this doesn’t mean the records aren’t what really counts of course, and you said it yourself: They don't have the impact that they SHOULD have. So what do you want to say, you recognize statistics as well, as everyone should.
 

Sunny014

Legend
2015-16, the "good run", was BOAT period in whole tennis history. Previously unseen domination of one player. So yeah, it really was a pretty good run.

When your wins are vs 34-35 yr old Fed and vs Moorey then you are no BOAT/SHIP, you are just one of the normal guys having an amazing season, nothing more.

People have had better seasons.
 

Sunny014

Legend
Now that’s worth discussing for once. However, this doesn’t mean the records aren’t what really counts of course, and you said it yourself: They don't have the impact that they SHOULD have. So what do you want to say, you recognize statistics as well, as everyone should.

Eye test is most important
Then everything else
 

SinneGOAT

Hall of Fame
Nadal at the French Open has dominated 3 different Generation of Athletes "in their peak"

Generation 1 :
Roger Federer and his Generation were at their peak in 2004-2009, Nadal won 4 FOs in this era.
Generation 2 : Novak Djokovic and his Generation were at their peak in 2010-2015, Nadal won 5 FOs in this era.
Generation 3 : Dominic Thiem and his Generation were at their peak in 2017-2021, Nadal won 4 FOs in this era.

No athlete ever has dominated 3 successive generations in their peak with such impunity as Nadal has.

This is the ultimate achievement in Tennis, not CYGS IMO.




241535318_2643714499108364_2249486966005899069_n.jpg
Lmaooooo “At the French Open” forgot that the French isn’t the only tournament?
 
Top