Djokovic_is_the_best#1
Bionic Poster
Rafa can keep that bud open record!2-1 bud good morning!
Rafa can keep that bud open record!2-1 bud good morning!
You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.Don't troll here.
This is not a troll thread.
Oh ****, you're right Nishikori's bank account is on another level compared to many other ATGs so he should definitely be included in each GOAT list there is.You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.
You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.
Oh ****, you're right Nishikori's bank account is on another level compared to many other ATGs so he should definitely be included in each GOAT list there is.
Melzer beat Joker from 2-0 down, so good self own there I guess. And that’s still better than Karatsev (playing in his first main draw of a major), and Shapo wetting the bed on every BP chance.Yes, we badly need Bagdhatis, Melzer, Youzhny or Schuttler deep in the second week of Slams, for the Tour to become more vivid again. LOL
It’s like the next generation of trolling!Have to give credit to the OP for basically rotating which fanbase to troll next.
Different achievements hard to compare, basically longevity vs concentrated dominance. In terms of difficulty though winning 13 titles at ANY slam (which basically per definition includes dominating three generations) is harder to achieve. We have seen CYGS and even if Novak does not win it this year it will happen again at some point. 13 titles at one slam is unique until now and I seriously doubt anyone of us will see another player in his lifetime who will repeat this feat.
That is 13 slams and with high probability it might become 14...Also it is achieved in less time than 13 FO of Nadal.I thought you were talking of winning
3 slams in a row in 2011-12
4 slams in a row in 2015-16
3 slams in a row in 2018-19
3 slams in a row in 2021
Now THAT is dominating different generations across different surfaces.
If it's just, then it is understandable why nobody after Laver did it.CYGS is just 4 slams stretched over 8-12 months.
2000 reasons why Nishikori is ATG. Coming soon.You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.
High?That is 13 slams and with high probability it might become 14...Also it is achieved in less time than 13 FO of Nadal.
So Djokovic is superior confirmed.
I dont consider Laver's achievement in the same tier as Djokovic's...Nole had it tougher (if he wins it).If it's just, then it is understandable why nobody after Laver did it.
Me too. As if they played 2 different sports. Not in the same league.I dont consider Laver's achievement in the same tier as Djokovic's...Nole had it tougher (if he wins it).
Of course i never imagined he could even win 1 slam on his entire career...High?
I don't give him more than 30% of going through Berrettini, Zverev and Medvedev.
If it's just, then it is understandable why nobody after Laver did it.
So except those from midle ages, WTA, and "almost did it but someone prevent it bohooo", nobody else did it.Holding 4 slams together, anyone can do it....
Don Budge did it
Laver did it twice (must be very easy back then)
Mcenroe almost did it (he was stopped by zoning ATG Lendl and in his time AO was skipped)
Connors would also have done it but only 3 slams that year, that prevented him....
Steffi did it
Serena did it
Navratilova did it
Novak did it
Fed would have done it 2 times back to back but Nadal who was at his peak stopped him, if Fed had the luxury of playing geriatric nadal of 2021 or injured nadal of 2015 then Fed would have done it twice
Holding 4 slams anyone can do...... no big deal
13 SLAMS ON ONE SURFACE..... NO ONE CAN EXCEPT RAFAEL NADAL ....
Hey at least we moved on from Federer's bank account for a moment...
So except those from midle ages, WTA, and "almost did it but someone prevent it bohooo", nobody else did it.
Good to know your filters
Lol no one ever said rafas record on clay especially at RG is mediocre. Everyone pretty much agrees no body dominated a single surface like he did, you’re just doing this to denigrate Novak’s potential CYGS to feel better.
If it were so easy why fed and Rafa struggled to do it?? They haven’t even come close to this
Nadal dominated slam head to head when the players were all in their 20s and not a million years old. Nadal also has the generic numbers in and around the same ballpark as his rivals. Djokovic needs to seperate himself from the slamcount for there to be no argument on GOAT.
Coulda shoulda wouldaIf Fed had geriatric Rafa of 2021 or injured Rafa of 2016 skipping FO back in his time of 06-07 then Federer would have won 8 slams in a row, i.e 2 CYGS back to back, LOL
This CYGS is overrated by Nole fans
100% True, Nole has to seperate himself from the pack with 24-25 slams to be considered that.
Coulda shoulda woulda
and Rafa got his ass kicked by a 37 year old fed when he was in his early 30s
I prefer Novak domination over entire tennis field for 10+ years over Rafa's domination over clay tennis solely for 15 years. Novak is tennis GOAT, Rafa is clay GOAT - we all knew that before this thread.Winning all masters, WTF (lack of it) etc etc are cumulative achievements or flaws, not a single largest feat that stretches across 100 years....
I am talking about sustaining dominance over multiple generations, that is true power, that is what defying nature means.
Nadal prevented guys older than him from winning clay, he prevented guys aged same as him, then even those younger to him have no chance, this is ABNORMAL.
This guy clearly stands out from anyone that ever held the racquet.
For the love of god, no one not even a single person challenges rafas clay court dominance but it’s not an argument for GOAT statusTalk of Clay.
How comes Rafa dominated 16 years on it ?
3 generation of athletes came and failed.
Federer was the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Federer's peak
Djokovic was the best clay courter from his gen (excluding Rafa of course) and Rafa stole 5 slams on clay in Novak's Peak
Thiem was/is the best clay courter from his gen and Rafa stole 4 slams on clay in Thiem's Peak
I prefer Novak domination over entire tennis field for 10+ years over Rafa's domination over clay tennis solely for 15 years. Novak is tennis GOAT, Rafa is clay GOAT - we all knew that before this thread.
You really compare 1960's with 2020's ? You really ccompare WTA with ATP ?If so many people can do it or come close to it and only be stopped by more formidable opposition than what Novak is facing then surely it must not be that big a deal.
I donno whats the hype
Martina Navratilova once won 6 out of 7 slams played at a stretch, can we imagine anyone do that??? Is CYGS bigger than that ??
Yeah once gassed, once injured. Stan rules though ))Novak's master who has beaten him at the AO, USO and on Clay
In his own peak Novak was Stan's bunny
Murray and 2015 Federer weren't mugs.It is better to have a Season like Mcenroe's 84 or even Novak's 2011 than a weak 2015-2016 type period when he held all 4 slams or this 2021 cygs
You are not fans of tennis if you prefer someone win 4 slams vs mugs over good tennis..
However , being so good at clay doesn't mean you are the best tennis player.CYGS
Murray and 2015 Federer weren't mugs.
And became GOAT despite those loses. Yeah, even GOATs lose matches. It's an uphill battle, filled with loss, downfalls and doubt. Ask ex-GOAT Federer, he will confirm.Novak's master who has beaten him at the AO, USO and on Clay
In his own peak Novak was Stan's bunny
2015-16, the "good run", was BOAT period in whole tennis history. Previously unseen domination of one player. So yeah, it really was a pretty good run.Murray in the FO final is mug level compared to Nadal and Lendl who stopped Fed (twice) and Mcenroe from winning all slams in those years
Anyway, 2015-2016 was still a good run, the 2021 one is a shame and bogus.
Now that’s worth discussing for once. However, this doesn’t mean the records aren’t what really counts of course, and you said it yourself: They don't have the impact that they SHOULD have. So what do you want to say, you recognize statistics as well, as everyone should.The point is, this is not about bank account, it is about brand value which signified iconic status, so if the greatest player of all time doesn't have an iconic status big enough then it means his records did not have the impact that they should have had..... it is simple
2015-16, the "good run", was BOAT period in whole tennis history. Previously unseen domination of one player. So yeah, it really was a pretty good run.
Now that’s worth discussing for once. However, this doesn’t mean the records aren’t what really counts of course, and you said it yourself: They don't have the impact that they SHOULD have. So what do you want to say, you recognize statistics as well, as everyone should.
Lmaooooo “At the French Open” forgot that the French isn’t the only tournament?Nadal at the French Open has dominated 3 different Generation of Athletes "in their peak"
Generation 1 : Roger Federer and his Generation were at their peak in 2004-2009, Nadal won 4 FOs in this era.
Generation 2 : Novak Djokovic and his Generation were at their peak in 2010-2015, Nadal won 5 FOs in this era.
Generation 3 : Dominic Thiem and his Generation were at their peak in 2017-2021, Nadal won 4 FOs in this era.
No athlete ever has dominated 3 successive generations in their peak with such impunity as Nadal has.
This is the ultimate achievement in Tennis, not CYGS IMO.
You don't agree that Nishikori is an ATG? Obviously not the Tier 1 ATG, but still an ATG.