Nadal's record over Djokovic is an insult to Djokovic's consistency.Djokovic will likely surpass Nadal.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! LOL!
Just be happy for your man... Smh.
Nadal's record over Djokovic is an insult to Djokovic's consistency.
I want him to surpass butt-picking-clay-monkey, no doubt about that. I very much prefer Nolan's tennis and showmanship.
You are right surpassing someone who is only capable of winning 1 out of the 4 slams shouldn't be a problemShouldn't be a problem. I mean he's only 3 slams behind at 30, is facing 7 months of rehab and currently looks like the world #30.
You are right surpassing someone who is only capable of winning 1 out of the 4 slams shouldn't be a problem
Lol Nadal has one slam in 3 years. Math is irrelevant hereIt must still be 2015 in your mind, then. After the USO, Djoker will be 0 for the last 6. I'm not great at math, but even if Nadal only wins one of the next 4 over the next two years, Djoker will have to do much better than 0 for 6 to overcome a 5 slam difference.
Lol Nadal has one slam in 3 years. Math is irrelevant here
Federer was out for 7 months also and he is even olderDjoker might need surgery and could be out for 7 months.
Reality is apparently irrelevant here.
Federer was out for 7 months also and he is even older
Djoker is younger. He can do itJust because Fed did it doesn't mean Djoker will. Djoker's not Fed.
Don't be stupid.Djoker is younger. He can do it
I'm not gonna even bother...Don't be stupid.
Fed and Nadal aren't keeping Djokovic from winning any more. Nobodies like Istomim, Kyrgios, and Berdych are.
The guys winning all the slams could retire tomorrow, and Djokovic would still be irrelevant.
He's no longer an elite player.
Yeah yeah no tennis player in the world is relevant except Federer. Go be an irritating pr1ck somewhere else will you.Don't be stupid.
Fed and Nadal aren't keeping Djokovic from winning any more. Nobodies like Istomim, Kyrgios, and Berdych are.
The guys winning all the slams could retire tomorrow, and Djokovic would still be irrelevant.
He's no longer an elite player.
You are right surpassing someone who is only capable of winning 1 out of the 4 slams shouldn't be a problem
Why can't some Fed fans just enjoy Federer winning Wimbledon number 8 and 19th slam, without sticking it to fans of other players?
Your guy won, focus on him. This is sport, and things change very quickly.
Djokovic is better at 3 of the 4 slams than Nadal. But I can't really be bothered arguingHalf of Nole's slams are at the AO. Let's not get into this debate.
BuuuuurnDjokovic is better at 3 of the 4 slams than Nadal. But I can't really be bothered arguing
Djokovic is better at 3 of the 4 slams than Nadal. But I can't really be bothered arguing
Thanks for the new infoI'm not a Nole hater at all, but it's clear that he has his favorite slam just like Fed and Rafa. That's all I'm saying.
Djokovic is better at 3 of the 4 slams than Nadal. But I can't really be bothered arguing
Even if we say that they are equal at the USO. Djokovic is still better across all 4 slams. Nadals incredible 10 RG is what makes the difference.The great TTW made up statistic. Let's see, does Djoker have more slams than Nadal? No, he's 3 behind, which in reality is quite a large number. Connors is as close to Djoker as Djoker is to Nadal. Does he have more Masters? No. Does he have more titles? No. How did Djoker fare against Nadal in slams? He's 4-9. No problem. This is what we'll do. Djoker has one more Wimbledon than Nadal, so we'll massage the USO numbers, create this fake statistic of being better at 3 of 4 slams and everything will be right in the world.
Djokovic being better at 3 out of 4 Slams is a fact. It's not the full picture of course but if the ************* can bring up skewed head to head records for a decade now then they need to deal with the fact that Nadal is inferior to both of his rivals everywhere outside of RG.The great TTW made up statistic. Let's see, does Djoker have more slams than Nadal? No, he's 3 behind, which in reality is quite a large number. Connors is as close to Djoker as Djoker is to Nadal. Does he have more Masters? No. Does he have more titles? No. How did Djoker fare against Nadal in slams? He's 4-9. No problem. This is what we'll do. Djoker has one more Wimbledon than Nadal, so we'll massage the USO numbers, create this fake statistic of being better at 3 of 4 slams and everything will be right in the world.
Even if we say that they are equal at the USO. Djokovic is still better across all 4 slams. Nadals incredible 10 RG is what makes the difference.
Half of Nole's slams are at the AO. Let's not get into this debate.
At least he is still capable of winning WimledonWho cares if he has one more Wimbledon? He's 3 slams behind. He needs 3 more Wimbledons just to tie Nadal. He better get out of rehab and get to work.
At least he is still capable of winning Wimledon