Most people don't realize how the ATP Pension Plan works, so here is a little inside info.
A player must play in 10 ATP main tour events in a calendar year to get a qualifying year. The Grand Slams don't count because they are ITF. You have to have 5 qualifying years in order to secure your pension. Part of their pension is also that they receive medical benefits. Challenger and Futures events do not count
Yes, all those wildcards that he received into main tour events count as events played. The other thing that people don't realize is that you get ATP points and money for losing, even in the qualifier, for most ATP events.
He played 10 ATP events in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and so far he is on track to play to 10 this year. Most of those early ATP tournaments he received wildcards into. Basically the USTA has given him his ATP retirement.
I don't dislike the young man, I just think he should have EARNED his ATP pension rather than have it given to him. I doubt if anybody in the history of the game has been given as many wildcards as he has.
Now they are on to their next wildcard experiment, Jack Sock with 5 ATP wildcards this year. Five more to go this year and he will be 20% on his way to his pension.
In the meantime, Ryan Harrison, (who earned his way through the tour) is continuing to climb up the rankings.
Dudes, the party after he schooled (76 46 76) Baby Fed in Memphis was epic. Wish you all could have been there...
DY plays wild card Steve Johnson, the world #400, in the first round of the BB&T Atlanta Open.
Looks like the streak is surely about to end now.
Or is it?
DY plays wild card Steve Johnson, the world #400, in the first round of the BB&T Atlanta Open.
Looks like the streak is surely about to end now.
Or is it?
DY plays wild card Steve Johnson, the world #400, in the first round of the BB&T Atlanta Open.
Looks like the streak is surely about to end now.
Or is it?
Losing has become a habit for Young. He needs to break it, fast. He has to defend a Round of 16 at the US Open soon, and if his form carries on like this, his ranking is going to plummet.
This has to be one of his toughest loses, considering they are the same age and took totally different paths. This might finally be the wake-up call that he needed.
Being around Isner, Roddick and Harrison for a while at the Olympics might be just what he needs.
ATP site says it was his 13th straight loss. Way to go for a record.
DY lost to a guy his own age with a ranking of what?
I watched him beat Murray a couple of years ago and I thought I was looking a possible top 25 player - maybe higher.
What happened to that guy?
DY should have just given away his Olympic slot to Baker. That would have been the mature thing to do
Mardy Fish always had weapons; just didn't take the game seriously (see food diet). What weapon is Young going to use once he hits 23?He can still put together a solid next 5 years and have a Mardy Fish-like career.
Mardy Fish always had weapons; just didn't take the game seriously (see food diet). What weapon is Young going to use once he hits 23?
As far as the hype, I'm sure the pundits thought the Youngs would interview top tennis coaches and turn Donald over to the one they thought was the best fit. If you'd told JMac that Donald's morbidly obese mother would continue to coach him, he would have said, "have you seen that forehand on Sam Querrery!?"
I doubt there's anyone on tour(or perhaps the planet) that would have done that. Playing Olympics is a once in a lifetime opportunity. He earned his spot on the team according the rules. imagine a player qualifying for Wimbledon(6 weeks out I believe) then stinking it up every event until then. should he give his spot up to the guy that just missed the cutoff but has been playing much better than him in the last 6 weeks? Tennis is still just an individual sport, despite it being in the Olympics(esp with ranking points now offered), no player should ever give another player an opportunity to get ranking points at their expense, if they do they clearly shouldn't be playing professionally.
You can't compare Wimbledon to the Olympics, ever. Top players skip the Olympics all the time. Sampras did. Look at Fish. He's skipping the Olympics right now. So your comparison is invalid.
its pretty hard to keep a high enough ranking to play in 20 or 15 straight tournaments while losing 1st round at every one.
not sure if Young can reach 20 because if his ranking falls low enough he won't get direct entry or would have to qualify or start playing challengers. and wins/losses in qualies or challengers don't count in win or loss streaks.
the streak could continue in a bizarre way. say he loses 1st round of his next 4 events. then plays & wins a few challengers. then loses another 1st round. he would then have a 20 match loss streak, despite winning matches at those challengers in between losses.
I doubt there's anyone on tour(or perhaps the planet) that would have done that. Playing Olympics is a once in a lifetime opportunity. He earned his spot on the team according the rules. imagine a player qualifying for Wimbledon(6 weeks out I believe) then stinking it up every event until then. should he give his spot up to the guy that just missed the cutoff but has been playing much better than him in the last 6 weeks? Tennis is still just an individual sport, despite it being in the Olympics(esp with ranking points now offered), no player should ever give another player an opportunity to get ranking points at their expense, if they do they clearly shouldn't be playing professionally.
Did Donald Young lose again on the first round?
You can't compare Wimbledon to the Olympics, ever. Top players skip the Olympics all the time. Sampras did. Look at Fish. He's skipping the Olympics right now. So your comparison is invalid.
Mcenroe does say some stupid stuff, especially these days. However, you have to give the guy credit for some of his impressive predications. Mcenroe started the comparisons with Sampras right after Federer won his first slam. Looking back, it was pretty impressive.
Also, Mcenroe said earlier this year that the top 4 should not underestimate Isner. Within the next month, Isner beat Federer and Djokovic. I bet his ego swelled up after that.
Oh I remember, funny thing is at the time Courier said there will never be another Sampras but as years went by and Fed started dominating Jim become one of the former pros who praised Fed the most.
One of the other pros who praised Fed so much relatively early (although Fed was already a 2 time slam winner and #1 by then) was Goran, here's the interview if you're interested:
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=18233
Q. The single toughest player that you faced over your career and the toughest stroke that you've had to deal with?
GORAN IVANISEVIC: Maybe toughest player I ever play is Pete, you know, because is guy that gives you only one, two chances per match, and if you don't take those chances, you finish. Usually with all these guys, I play lot of matches, but usually you get more chances. With him, two, three if he's generous, you know. I think with him it was the toughest for me to play. You know, he beat me twice here in Wimbledon. But also Andre is a guy that was very tough to play. Becker, another guy. His serve was unbelievable. But I still think that Federer is the biggest talent from all the players I ever play in my career. I don't know if he's going to win so many Grand Slams like Pete, but definitely he's the most talented player I ever play.
Q. Does he have a greater range of talents than Pete? How would you explain?
GORAN IVANISEVIC: Some things he does better than Pete. I mean, on the court he's like magician. Pete was destroying. Pete was serving. Nobody talked ever about Pete's serve. They were only talking about my serve. But when you play Pete, you couldn't touch his serve, you know. Even when you returned, then he hits forehand winner and the point is finish. But Federer, the way he plays, he's back, he comes in. When you look him, you think tennis is very easy sport, but it's not.
True, another poster here (Fedex) made a similar prediction.
Donald Young has said he has gone back to his old prince and he will win Gold medal.
Goran is a *******. Therefore it doesnt count
Well Seppi just rolled him in the first round so it's lucky number 15 for DY.
He should've played the LA tournament instead. He surely would've broken the streak there. But I guess everybody wants to be able to say that they were an Olympian once.
Well Seppi just rolled him in the first round so it's lucky number 15 for DY.
He should've played the LA tournament instead. He surely would've broken the streak there. But I guess everybody wants to be able to say that they were an Olympian once.
So the Don gets his next shot at snapping the streak in Toronto. This time verses Jeremy Chardy. Hmmm, could be a tight one.
BTW; in defense of DY, he did actually win a match right before the Olympics: a 6-2, 7-6 (5) victory in doubles in the first round of the BB&T Atlanta Open at Atlantic Station.