D
Deleted member 788697
Guest
I'm in Australia already so won't have to waste $8Splurge for the $8 monthly charge and then cancel in 3 weeks
I'm in Australia already so won't have to waste $8Splurge for the $8 monthly charge and then cancel in 3 weeks
Hmm. I have the opposite problem. I already have ESPN+ from a Disney package but don’t have ESPN since I no longer have cable. So in the past I had to subscribe for a month to HULU Tv or equivalent to get ESPN. If they moved all the matches to ESPN+ it would make my life much easier.
Poor baby. It's still only round 1.This AO* is going to be a bust.
Their coverage is the worst. All talking . Never show matches. Have to listen to McEnroe and Evert. It stinks
World feed commentators are far betterTheir coverage is the worst. All talking . Never show matches. Have to listen to McEnroe and Evert. It stinks
$9.99 for a single month. Sign up and immediately cancel. I do this twice a year.World feed commentators are far better
Heh, heh - for those of us in the U.S. who follow many other sports (like college football, ice hockey, etc.), ESPN+ has become a way for ESPN to regularly bilk you twice for something you used to pay for once. If you have ESPN/ESPN2, you have to buy ESPN+ separately. If you have ESPN+, you have to subscribe to cable to get ESPN/ESPN2 separately. It pisses me off to no end.
Quick summary of what service you need to see matches:
*All Ashe Stadium matches, most Armstrong Stadium matches, some Grandstand matches: ESPN/ESPN2 (also ESPN3) - cable subscription required
*Some Grandstand matches (and possibly a small number of Armstrong matches), all matches on Court 17 and other courts: ESPN+ - separate streaming subscription required
Even though there are many events on ESPN+ I have interest in watching, as a point of principle I refuse to subscribe to it. It is my personal protest against having to pay twice for something in most of the 2010s I received by paying once.
The NFL playoffs are NOT televised on ESPN+, at least in the U.S. (Actually, ESPN as a network, whether it be ESPN/ESPN2 or ESPN+, only televises one playoff game per season.)NFL Playoffs and AO on ESPN+ makes me a happy camper for a couple weeks!
Will they show the final on espn3?Heh, heh - for those of us in the U.S. who follow many other sports (like college football, ice hockey, etc.), ESPN+ has become a way for ESPN to regularly bilk you twice for something you used to pay for once. If you have ESPN/ESPN2, you have to buy ESPN+ separately. If you have ESPN+, you have to subscribe to cable to get ESPN/ESPN2 separately. It pisses me off to no end.
Quick summary of what service you need to see matches:
*All Ashe Stadium matches, most Armstrong Stadium matches, some Grandstand matches: ESPN/ESPN2 (also ESPN3) - cable subscription required
*Some Grandstand matches (and possibly a small number of Armstrong matches), all matches on Court 17 and other outer courts: ESPN+ - separate streaming subscription required
Even though there are many events on ESPN+ I have interest in watching and I can easily afford it, as a point of principle I refuse to subscribe to it. It is my personal protest against having to pay twice for something in most of the 2010s I received by paying once.
I thought they are available only on espn3 which you can get on espn+ using your ISP in my case XfinityAshe stadium matches are available in ESPN+. Just saw some today. But, I believe at the SF or Final, it’s on ESPN only.
I didn’t re-check, but I think you’re right. I do have ESPN3 via my ISP.I thought they are available only on espn3 which you can get on espn+ using your ISP in my case Xfinity
They should, yes. I believe anything that is televised on ESPN/ESPN2 is also available on ESPN3.Will they show the final on espn3?
This ESPN Press article seems to indicate that the two Finals will be on ESPN and not on ESPN3. But there's a line item on the schedule that shows ESPN3 on Sunday (the day of the men's Final), though with different start time (4 hours earlier).Will they show the final on espn3?
While I agree w/ you on principle, the Disney+ bundle (Disney +, Hulu, ESPN+) is worth it because I'm going to watch the Marvel & Star Wars shows, and some Hulu shows, and my daughters and wife will watch some Hulu shows, and paying for Disney and Hulu separately is the same as getting the bundle, which gets me ESPN+.Even though there are many events on ESPN+ I have interest in watching and I can easily afford it, as a point of principle I refuse to subscribe to it. It is my personal protest against having to pay twice for something in most of the 2010s I received by paying once.