titoelcolombiano
Legend
For a moment forget who's fault it is the point remains 7 meetings at RG and 2 at AO or meeting after meeting in clay masters, RG but just the odd meeting in shanghai, WTF, cinci etc (which of course nadal normally loses he only has 1 win over fed indoors ever and that was in 2013 with fed injured which further proves the point - with the exception of 2017 for djokovic fedovic can almost always go deep in slams and masters in their beta mug form while nadal only goes deep when in red hot form. I'll excuse them now as they are all post prime bar djokovic e.g. I won't hold it against nadal if he goes out 2nd round Wimbledon this year as he is post prime and 32 but he has been doing this in slams and masters when world. No2 in his peak and prime
If he did what he did in 2011 more often and get to. Finals. Of everything he would be getting beaten far more (as he did in 2011 7-0)
On the 'going deep in slams' comment; review the stats I provided on who has exited slams earlier and I think you'll find it is not as one sided as one would assume. With regards to M1000 level, Rafa is the current record holder so that's enough said on that really.
On the 'getting beaten more often' comment, the slam H2H would suggest otherwise. Djokerer are probably lucky they didn't catch him more often:
Rafa 8-3 Federer
Rafa 9-6 Djokovic
Even if we look at it outside of RG in Djokerer's playground:
Rafa 4-3 Federer
Djoker 5-3 Rafa
So no, the stats would suggest that Rafa is still winning 57% of matches against Fed and 37% against Djoker - not a bad winning rate against two ATG's on their preferred surfaces. It certainly beats the miserable win rate stas that Djoker and Federer put up at RG against Rafa; Djoker 14% and Fed 0%